...but I'm not arguing semantics...
You are arguing semantics. What does it matter if you call it griefing, ganking, bullying, mugging or flower arranging? The issue is about the intention and the effect, not what it's called.
...but I'm not arguing semantics...
the ineffectual security system is well known this isnt what the arguements about its about what the OP described as griefing and others as ganking which it never is or was in this game
- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -
well said sir shame that some ME ME ME ME players cant grasp the concept
You're right, you said that only you can have fun because only you paid money, right? And if you're not having fun, everyone else must be punished in order for you to have fun, right?
look get this concept in your head if you allow for people to be heros you have to allow for people to be villans you cant have a realistic enviroment without good or bad the players in this instance did absolutley nothing that broke the games rules if you cant grasp that concept then stick to solo because open is not for you .I can say to FD is lock solo if you go there and want to come back to open you have to clear your save i have only ever played in open ive lost a few ships to pirates and plain muderers im wiser stronger because of it im not easy to pin down any more im more aware of whats around me and how to escape but i wouldnt have had it anyother way and negative or possitive incidents are all part of the game for me to enjoyWrong. Again, sorry.
I'm perfectly aware of the sort of "PvP" players that spoil the game for others (not those who add to it) and so I play Solo. Some players, particularly younger players, will just give up the game.
- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -
Really? You put NPC's in the same category of threat level????
- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -
look get this concept in your head if you allow for people to be heros you have to allow for people to be villans you cant have a realistic enviroment without good or bad the players in this instance di absolutley nothing that broke the games rules if you cant grasp that concept then stick to solo because open is not for you i i can say to FD is lock solo if you go there and want to come back to open you have to clear your save
You are arguing semantics. What does it matter if you call it griefing, ganking, bullying, mugging or flower arranging? The issue is about the intention and the effect, not what it's called.
I am sticking to Solo, you seem to think I'm against this behaviour to protect myself. Also I'm not saying any rule was broken. I'm talking about good sportsmanship. I'm am certain that most of the players who pick on less experienced players don't do it to play the role of "villain" - that's just an convenient excuse to hide behind. They do it to cause grief to other players.
People keep trying to equate this to some kind of realistic situation but it really isn't. If, for example, some crazy psychopath was zooming around a space station ramming into unsuspecting ships then the station authorities would be quick to act. They shoot you down for loitering do you really think they would allow ramming?
enjoy your solo play all i can say to you is that ive never been griefed or bullied in this game and yes they probably will sort out the station ramming but i do hope they lock solo the arguemnt is about in my opinion people attributing legitimate game play to cheating hacking ganking and griefing and in this case it was none of the stated just gameplay and like i said you do not need any reason to kill another player in game thats the freedom this game is about you choose what you do yes security needs improving but if you remove the freedom of action from the game that will be the death of itI am sticking to Solo, you seem to think I'm against this behaviour to protect myself. Also I'm not saying any rule was broken. I'm talking about good sportsmanship. I'm am certain that most of the players who pick on less experienced players don't do it to play the role of "villain" - that's just an convenient excuse to hide behind. They do it to cause grief to other players.
People keep trying to equate this to some kind of realistic situation but it really isn't. If, for example, some crazy psychopath was zooming around a space station - and I accept that it could happen, if not with this frequency - ramming into unsuspecting ships then the station authorities would be quick to act. They shoot you down for loitering do you really think they would allow ramming?
Why lock solo? Wasn't it promised to backers?enjoy your solo play all i can say to you is that ive never been griefed or bullied in this game and yes they probably will sort out the station raming but i do hope they lock solo
So let's see if we can square the circle on this argument.
It wasn't griefing.
It may have been ganking, or is that only a sub type of griefing?
It is certainly possible and therefore 'part of the game'.
Can all agree it wasn't very nice?
Or am I on an fool's errand to find agreement in a forum thread?
what you are getting is player using solo as a saftey net to get well ahead with no human threat then coming back onto open play as if they did it the hard way its not cricket is it and yes im a backerWhy lock solo? Wasn't it promised to backers?
what you are getting is player using solo as a saftey net to get well ahead with no human threat then coming back onto open play as if they did it the hard way its not cricket is it and yes im a backer
Do you have any proof of that? (And why does it even matter? Are there prizes?)
This has been discussed a ton of times.
Every player, new or old, can do the same thing - even a brand new player. I can't see the issue here at all if everyone can do the same stunt. If it's too tough in Open, go Group or Solo until you're ready.what you are getting is player using solo as a saftey net to get well ahead with no human threat then coming back onto open play as if they did it the hard way its not cricket is it and yes im a backer
just like trying to explain to these guys that killing without reason isn't griefing.