Griefers make open impossible, and how easy the solution is.

That might be because I'm not a native speaker, and a very similar thing may be used slightly differently in my mothertongue, but please enlighten me, I'd really like to learn so that I won't use it incorrectly again.
Pigeon chess implies that the other person is responding with nonsense. The response given was directly related and addressing your post, whether you liked it or not.
 
I fail to see any purpose to the timer than making it more streamlined to combat log with big shields.

The timer is a delay on a menu log, thus cannot be there to streamline it. The only purpose for the timer is to discourage logging out to avoid in-game consequences.

Also, shields were already down in the example I showed. Even disabled, sheildless, vessels can easily last more than fifteen seconds against a concerted attack.
 
I think you can reassort quotes in any fashion you want and still be dishonest and a liar and win the internet. You would anyway still fail at understanding the nuance.
You're mad that in showing you where you said exactly what I claimed you said, that your quotes were not in your preferred order? And these quotes, of your words, which are taken directly from this thread, they're somehow making me a "liar" by referencing them.

So that's a yes to denial of reality?

Here, let's do a fun exercise: Explain this vaunted nuance to me.
 
You're mad that in showing you where you said exactly what I claimed you said, that your quotes were not in your preferred order? And these quotes, of your words, which are taken directly from this thread, they're somehow making me a "liar" by referencing them.

So that's a yes to denial of reality?

Here, let's do a fun exercise: Explain this vaunted nuance to me.

I'm not mad bro. I already told you it was not my intent to troll the guy. Rounding down hull to 0 is something I got maybe twice in a few years. You look silly arguing over nothing really.
 
The timer is a delay on a menu log, thus cannot be there to streamline it. The only purpose for the timer is to discourage logging out to avoid in-game consequences.

Also, shields were already down in the example I showed. Even disabled, sheildless, vessels can easily last more than fifteen seconds against a concerted attack.

It's a legit move so it has officially streamlined combat logging.
 
streamlined
giphy.gif
 
Well you kept claiming that some nuance was being missed, but you cannot seem to identify it yourself. Seems like it doesn't exist.

Simple. It's a matter of subject and verbs. When I said I had a laugh menu logging, I used "I", which means me.

When I also said it takes more input for a combat log than some asymetric gank, I used "it". It's not the same subject.

That your brain reads that as me bragging out, which I wasnt, because it seems obvious for anyone with some common sense that it's hard to reproduce a bug where your hull is at 0... All that is just proving you cant read a post without confering intent to the poster. And it's really all in your head.
 
Irrespective of what you think is legit or not, I'm not sure how you think a delay streamlines anything.

Irrespective of what you think, an unengineered shieldless T7 time to kill is below 15 secs against a meta fdl, and menu logging has been decreted legit by ex dev.
 
Simple. It's a matter of subject and verbs. When I said I had a laugh menu logging, I used "I", which means me.

When I also said it takes more input for a combat log than some asymetric gank, I used "it". It's not the same subject.

That your brain reads that as me bragging out, which I wasnt, because it seems obvious for anyone with some common sense that it's hard to reproduce a bug where your hull is at 0... All that is just proving you cant read a post without confering intent to the poster. And it's really all in your head.
Well, first problem is you didn't use the word "it" where you just claimed:
A good combat log to troll nerds take skills, and can involve more input from a player than some asymetric ganks with flat 70% damage buffs from synthesis or the trainer that basically reduced "ganking" gameplay ot a point and click one shot game.
Nevermind that "it" would have referred to the act of combat logging, which is a verb because it's an action. And nevermind that referring to two subjects is not what nuance means.

This is pretty hilarious in the face of you accusing me of engineering quotes, lying, and needing to read.
 
Irrespective of what you think, an unengineered shieldless T7 time to kill is below 15 secs against a meta fdl, and menu logging has been decreted legit by ex dev.

I made no statements to the contrary and I'm not sure what this has to do with anything about your use of the word "streamlined".

How does the existence of a timer streamline logging off? What could possibly be more streamlined about having to wait fifteen seconds than not having to wait fifteen seconds?
 
Well, first problem is you didn't use the word "it" where you just claimed:

Nevermind that "it" would have referred to the act of combat logging, which is a verb because it's an action. And nevermind that referring to two subjects is not what nuance means.

This is pretty hilarious in the face of you accusing me of engineering quotes, lying, and needing to read.

Combat log could be a verb. Combat logging, that's the subject, dude. For exemple, we dont say "I combat logging".

Kids these days.
 
I'm all for annoying BGS bois in Solo but if I'm looking for a real fight... Then no blocking. If I don't want to see someone I cut everyone out, or nobody at all.
I play in open for the positive social interactions only (so about 95% of interactions), and Mobius is too empty to provide it (plus nobody in there talks anyway).

FDev gave me a tool to “play my way”, so I’ll use it on anyone that shoots at me so I don’t have to deal with the hassle of evasion, and hang out with the civilized folks. There aren’t many PvPers out there anyway, so I don’t have to use it often. I have about 4 people on my block list atm.
 

Deleted member 38366

D
I guess the current state of the Game could be described like this (since it's all officially working as intended) :


PS.
Was busy today hauling Supplies to repair a Damaged Station, playing in Open.
An ELITE ranked CMDR parked his Cutter a few km from the Station and was observing me, being a careful CMDR (and flying a Cargo Type-9) I'm of course monitoring the Contact on the Scanner myself.

Turns out I'm sourcing supplies from a Station within the Control Space of his Player Faction/PMF. All he asked to know was who I was and what I was doing.
1576702997392.png


So... a Session in Open Play - and no shots fired, just some friendly chat.
o7 to the Corsarios De Heimdal :)
 
Combat log could be a verb. Combat logging, that's the subject, dude. For exemple, we dont say "I combat logging".

Kids these days.
So you didn't say "it", but your whole response pretty much exclusively relied on you using that exact word. I proved very clearly that you did not.

Let's make this simple for you. "Combat logging" is a present participle. It's an action. A verb. Not a noun. Not a subject. Behold:
Capture.PNG


And lest we forget, your response was entirely predicated on you using the word "it", which means you didn't even read your own post enough to know you didn't. And you don't know the difference between a verb and noun but you're here saying "kids these days". And you made all these claims to "nuance" but you think nuance is "talking about two things".
 
How does the existence of a timer streamline logging off? What could possibly be more streamlined about having to wait fifteen seconds than not having to wait fifteen seconds?

Well at the moment you can menu log in combat by waiting 15 secs. Just open a thread about reducing the wait if you want to streamline logging in combat even more in the legit intended design of the game. Or combat log. I personnaly dont care. If someone log on me I consider that as an inconsequential win, and vice versa.
 
I guess the current state of the Game could be described like this (since it's all officially working as intended) :


PS.
Was busy today hauling Supplies to repair a Damaged Station, playing in Open.
An ELITE ranked CMDR parked his Cutter a few km from the Station and was observing me, being a careful CMDR (and flying a Cargo Type-9) I'm of course monitoring the Contact on the Scanner myself.

Turns out I'm sourcing supplies from a Station within the Control Space of his Player Faction/PMF. All he asked to know was who I was and what I was doing.
View attachment 156052

So... a Session in Open Play - and no shots fired, just some friendly chat.
o7 to the Corsarios De Heimdal :)
Yeah, I've had similar banter. Whenever I'm active in a system I like to ping any players I happen to see just to find out if it's they've got any interest in the system or if they're just passing through for missions or whatever. I'll even call out on system chat occasionally if I'm active in a war and I'm going to be hanging out in-system for a while, just to see if there's anyone about in other modes. So far I've not been successful in getting a reply back, but I'd feel remiss if I didn't at least try.
 
Back
Top Bottom