I have the impression Frontier developers are tired of working at this game

[Guest 161958]

I can understand why as they really are always under fire, but things like these show how they do not have passion anymore when working on ED:

Change font size because community asked, does not even check if fix works. Css website level issue.

 

[Northpin]

it was probably assigned to some poor intern

 

[ebbrell]

They have passion for game, its QA which have let it down.
Can you imagine working there, they must wake up every morning so happy they are there.

Then this forum comments come in, I'm surprised they haven't turned the forum off..

 

[babelfisch]

The fix actually does work, unless it's the last jump on your route. So to be fair, they probably did check if it works, they just didn't check all possible variants.

 

[Deaf Space]

this level of disregard for the player base is UNFORGIVABLE!!!! its almost as bad as misspellings, we should riot

 

[Vandaahl]

Paper bag, anyone...?

 

[gooddoc]

They have passion for game, its QA which have let it down.
Can you imagine working there, they must wake up every morning so happy they are there.

Then this forum comments come in, I'm surprised they haven't turned the forum off..

maybe they have a decent QA team, that find all the issues. But when they report them, the answer is......."yeah thanks, it'll be looked at AFTER the update/patch/fix? goes out"

 

[Deaf Space]

Hello mr. hyperbole, go smoke your cigar outside please

i wish that was my name, lol

 

[babelfisch]

Hello mr. hyperbole, go smoke your cigar outside please

May I remind you that you attested the whole dev team a lack of passion because one word is misaligned under certain circumstances? Mr. Hyperbole...

 

[Robbie84]

Try this... (don't)

If you have a ship that is "overpowered", and by that I mean over 100% power. Usually you would disable the modules to get below or do module management.

Now, what happened to me is the following:

Ship with 104% power and when cargo rack is off (5%) it goes to 99% and all is fine. So I went to collect some G5 mats on the surface and dispatched the ship. After I was done, I recall and get the message "Power capacity exceeded, etc". AI turned the Cargo Rack on and ship went to 104% power and when it "spawned" from the recall it took a nosedive to the surface and exploded. Lost a ton of exploration data and had to self destruct in SRV.

I was shocked and helpless since I just couldn't do anything. Quite the rage quit after that.

Anyway, be aware of this if you are running OP ship.

 

[Crank Larson]

I minor UI issue is completely unrelated to the level of passion shown by anyone. You could at least complain about one of the proper bugs.

 

[thistle]

I can understand why as they really are always under fire, but things like these show how they do not have passion anymore when working on ED:
View attachment 130238

Change font size because community asked, does not even check if fix works. Css website level issue.

The change worked, every single step in your waypoint journey worked absolutely fine. The last single jump, the "Next" element is misaligned.

OH NOES!!! SACK THEM ALL!!!

Give me a ing break.

 

[Valorin]

I can understand why as they really are always under fire, but things like these show how they do not have passion anymore when working on ED:
View attachment 130238

Change font size because community asked, does not even check if fix works. Css website level issue.

It seems to work fine for many people though. Me, for example. So perhaps it just didn't happen when testing?

 

[thistle]

It seems to work fine for many people though. Me, for example. So perhaps it just didn't happen when testing?

And it does work fine. It's just the irrelevant "next" single word for a single jump. So a 10 jump journey, the only problem is one minor misalignment that doesnt tell us anything anyway, for the final jump.

We have such hysterical nonsense on this forum (not you)

 

[Crank Larson]

As I explained earlier, I am not complaining. I am simply saying the attention to detail is gone.

And you'd still be wrong. You demonstrate a single detail that was missed. I could (though I can't be bothered) give you many examples where the attention to detail is exemplary. As I say, minor issues do not imply what you are suggesting.

 

[Stigbob]

Maybe they miss the well articluted feedback under the comedy salt avalanche that happens anyway no matter what they do say or don't do or say.

 

[Valorin]

Oh really? Then my impression is probably wrong and it is just an hard to repeat bug.

See my original post. I edited it with a picture.

 

[babelfisch]

Highly subjective matter so no reason to discuss it.

So why did you start a thread if it's so sujective that you see no reason to discuss it?

 

[Crank Larson]

Highly subjective matter so no reason to discuss it.

Weird. You'd think that someone starting a thread does so because they do want to discuss the matter they post the thread about. I guess you only want to discuss things with people that will agree with you?

 

[Stealthie]

The fix actually does work, unless it's the last jump on your route. So to be fair, they probably did check if it works, they just didn't check all possible variants.

Is that what's causing it?

First time I looked at the Nav HUD, after the update, I got this but I haven't seen it since.
I wasn't sure if it was one of those bugs which only appears once and then fixes itself, or is specific to one ship, or something.

If it does just screw-up on the last jump, it's not really a big deal (although it'd be nice to get it fixed) 'cos you can see your destination on your canopy HUD.