Not by itself (not anything terribly relevant to be precise), however, FD did say "high priority".
- Status
Not by itself (not anything terribly relevant to be precise), however, FD did say "high priority".
I wasn't talking about bugd in general, I said I hadn't experienced them apart from that one. I am sure there are plenty, but again that was not part of the original conversation I was having and that you butted into (which is allowed). I was not interested in dicussing the numerous bugs. All I was doing was being polite. Something that seemed to go straight over your head. I said that in the next post very clearly.
My next post was:
Again case closed. Stop with your silly games.
They didn't say prioritised though, they said reprioritised. Considering it had a priority before but got reprioritised the logical conclusion is that it no longer is a priority. How someone could come to the conclusion it will certainly be part of the next update is beyond me (no pun intended).
Additionally the CM team also said they don't know when or how fleet carriers will be implemented.
The issue is that I did not claim the bolded parts, you are shooting strawmans. The fact that you were not discussing bugs before my post is irrelevant.
No they didn't. They never said that the Fleet Carriers and Ice planets were going to be high priority after beyond.
Where and in which context?
But that's not a logical conclusion and it directly contradicts what they have stated.
Since I am the only one who directly quoted them in this discussion I'd invite you to do the same. In other words, stop making random claims up when I already presented the facts.
"After Beyond, Fleet Carriers and Ice Planets will be the new high priority features"
From https://forums.frontier.co.uk/goto/post?id=7880818
Lol, that's post was not made by Frontier.
Of course it's relevant, you started talking about bug, I said it had nothing to do with the original converstaion I was having. I shouldn't have been so poilte to you. Next time I will tell you to shove it. I had no wish to talk about bugs with you or anyone else and i continually expressed that opinion to you. You didnt want to take no for an answer.
Its not me with the straw man. You are deluded.
Now shove it.
No, but it is a quote from them allegedly. If you really dont think it's legitimate then why didn't you say so and avoid the hassle of this last page?
A ha ha ha ha. That wasn't a frontier post. That was SenseiMatty assumption of what the post meant.
The thing is, I made no claims about your conversation before I arrived, that's why you are shooting a strawman, if that's false then quote me.
We have been. That is what we have been saying all along. You are really making me laugh a lot today.
How do you know?
You replied to a reply I gave to someone else. If you are not going to take that into account, then you should have said so from the very begining or not even replied to me as it was completely irrelevant to the conversation I was having. I did point that out to you on numerous occasions.
No, it's the wrong interpretation of a quote from them. It actually was me who provided the original quote...
I'm waiting for that quote...
Because I have read the posts regarding ice planets and fleet carriers and high priority was never mentioned. Read SenseiMatty post again and it is obvious that he is talking about what he thought not what FDev said.
- Status