Well they say the truth does hurt...
Alternately, why waste your time listening to idiots?
I’m OK with that.
Aw, man, its a shame you were never a player of the game i deved for then. We could have had some right royal sparrings
Well they say the truth does hurt...
I’m OK with that.
ED's a game movies are a different type of thing.
But take the new star wars films as another example, I expect pop-corn entertainment and so I enjoy them. People going to see them expecting the kids movie to be made for adults or not have girls in it come out furious. Realistic expectations win every time.
Alternately, why waste your time listening to idiots?
Yes, I see they are different when it ruins your argument. Are you just going to keep on trying to argue against reality? I've already presented the facts to show that you're incorrect. Then after pointing out your flawed argument, you backpeddal and say "but it doesn't count for that"
Of course it does. Your argument was if it makes more money, it's better game design. How is movie design so different? You offer no rebuttal either - just more silly argumentation. When pointing out the entire industry doesn't agree with you, you turn around and say "but they don't follow MY requirements"
That's fine but then don't keep trying to argue it's good game design - nobody believes you. You aren't convincing anyone that because you think it's great, we all should too.
I knew I would not like the new movies, so, I saved my money.
JJ Abrams is no match for Lawrence Kasdan, or Ridley Scott.
I've filtered out certain people who tend to "hog the spotlight", which cuts the size of threads like this in half, and even then this thread huge![]()
Why don't you censure the commanders dragging it off topic, it's pretty obvious who they are.
I like that idea.
That seems a fair point, too.
Can the Community Team recommend a way of getting in contact with FDev PR, RE the topic, please?
I don't get why people get so hung up on what they imagine games might be, far easier to try the demo/judge gameplay vids then make an informed choice. But then I also dodged NMS and Star Citizen.
Can the Community Team recommend a way of getting in contact with FDev PR, RE the topic, please?
Me too. What's that got to do with anything?
Still nothing heh? So much for the great communication. This seems to be the worst case of them ignoring their community.
Option 1.
Option 2.
Haven't you missed the point of what a quest is? Certainly in Elite which is a game with no end game - and that's what's good about it (I don't think I'm the only one who thinks that). Cutting the quest in half, then you'll be complaining there's nothing to do (where's the content) and secondly, the human tech broker uses the regular economy. Having the guardian tech broker be exactly the same, is distinguished from human tech how?
Option 3. Double down. The more guardian tech puzzles you solve the more (and more and more deadly) the Thargoids that interdict you for them are. Having all the guardian tech unlocked should be at least as much of a challenge as reaching elite status imo.
This is a game community that chews through content fast so "nerf the content", I think I've probably heard it all now. Seriously don't do it if you don't want to do the puzzles but with luck you'd do a couple, do something else for bit .. come back and do a couple more, and still have an interest in Guardian tech 6 months from now. By which time the devs will have had chance to develop another mini game for you.
The only thing that will get any level of response or action is bad publicity, the kind that negatively affects shareholder stock. FD being a publicly traded Company, are in the business of making money. Consider the Kickstarter a capital investment, not in Elite Dangerous, but in FD. As it stands, Elite's potential is being utterly wasted on threadbare content stretched across an entire year. As a LEP holder, it's disappointing to see the direction being taken, the Three Monkeys mentality is indicative of the fact that direction is very much intentional. The design decisions are based on stretching an investment as far as possible, not engaging with the people who invested.