Please tell me:
DID I MISSUSED PHRASE PvP ? Should I have used GvV? Really?
DID I MISSUSED PHRASE PvP ? Should I have used GvV? Really?
Are you sure? Pirates are gankers and are not legitimate PvP player? The victim who refuses to give cargo and was killed is good, the killer pirate bad?
Bounty hunters who scan their "victims" before killing are gankers too?
Actually this thread is only about those and not at all about your definition of PvP. If to PvP player consent to fight each other and one of them CLs is a problem too, but generally this CL PvP style is indeed easily solved by tags/karma and similar ideas.
Please tell me:
DID I MISSUSED PHRASE PvP ? Should I have used GvV? Really?
You misused PvP when you said two people fighting each other would be stripped down PvP while one strong guy killing someone helpless would be the real PvP.
I think the sad truth is, for anything to work like this... PvP / Piracy / Open play antics.. then OPEN really can only be a persistent server controlled single instance environment.
Fixing combat logging, along with a multitude of other 'problems' are beneficiaries of such a system change.
Thread can be closed, its evolving into questions about definition of PvP, and yes, its my fault too that this happend.