For archival purpose:
An analysis revealed that the size of giants, super giants and dwarfs (that is normal star dwarfs, NOT white dwarfs) is NOT as it is in the real universe. E.g., are most M (Red giants) smaller than Sol or M (Red dwarfs) exist with radii much larger than Sol's.
A proper classification is not possible (see the discussion under the given link). Hence I just made up limits which shall not be passed as when a (super) giant or dwarf shall be considered as such.
I've updated the first post with this information.
Edit: However, the red "giant" in the above post which made me do this analysis shall NOT be removed. Thus it is now unique in a second way: it's the only "giant" star with a radius smaller than Sol's that is considered as a record holding body.
An analysis revealed that the size of giants, super giants and dwarfs (that is normal star dwarfs, NOT white dwarfs) is NOT as it is in the real universe. E.g., are most M (Red giants) smaller than Sol or M (Red dwarfs) exist with radii much larger than Sol's.
A proper classification is not possible (see the discussion under the given link). Hence I just made up limits which shall not be passed as when a (super) giant or dwarf shall be considered as such.
- The radius of giants needs to be larger than 23 solar radii (because of a classic book).
- The radius of super giants needs to be larger than 420 solar radii (because of another classic book)
- And finally, (regular star) dwarfs must be smaller than 1 solar radius.
I've updated the first post with this information.
Edit: However, the red "giant" in the above post which made me do this analysis shall NOT be removed. Thus it is now unique in a second way: it's the only "giant" star with a radius smaller than Sol's that is considered as a record holding body.
Last edited: