I don’t think we should replace any species because that gets ride of species that have: A been here with us since JWE1 and are therefore probably shouldn’t be removed since they are the classic1st Question: Because there will always be limits to the number of species they can add, and by removing some they make room for others... also because many species added are redundant or inferior to alternatives, and anything the removed species could add could be done better by better species.
2nd Question: Refer to previous answer...
I think a better question would be why do you think all species from JWE2 could be replaced? I mean... how do you even come to such a conclusion?
this is a fandom take what it says with a grain of salt as anyone can edit it and it doesn’t have guidelines to what you can add or fact checking so anyone could add literally anythingAccording to what I've read, yes there was...
In the film Jurassic World, she was going to be the latest attraction added to the park for higher profits. The hybrid was created by modifying the genome of a Tyrannosaurus rex with the DNA of various other theropods. Some of the known species that were included were Velociraptor,[5] Carnotaurus, Giganotosaurus, Majungasaurus, Rugops,[1] Pycnonemosaurus, Quilmesaurus, Viavenator,[11] Deinosuchus,[4] and Therizinosaurus.[2] There were also the DNA of modern animals such as cuttlefish, tree frog,[5] and a pit viper snake.[2] - Jurassic Park Wiki
Regarding the DLC species of JWE2 being included in the base game I fully support.We already have enough hunting dromaeosaurs (Deinonychus should require prey not meat), there is room for the fishing Austroraptor. The probability that Pelecanimimus being added is higher than Ornithomimus.
Adding Protoceratops and Plateosaurus can serve as means to catch up to Prehistoric Kingdom.
It is best that species of Jurassic World: Evolution 2 (DLC species included) be available in the base game of Jurassic World: Evolution 3.
I fully agree. All species from JWE2 (both base game and DLCs) should return as base species.Regarding the DLC species of JWE2 being included in.the base game I fully support.
Are you sure? I could've sworn Jack Horner or somebody said that's where it's long claws came from.There was no therizinosaurus DNA in the indominus rex
I only chose Ornithomimus because it's the type genus of it's family. It's really weird to me that it hasn't gotten any attention from the franchise and I'd love to have a traditional Ornithomimusaurid with feathers.Ornithomimus would be a super redundant addition with Struthiomimus in the game, but a feathered variant of Struthiomimus is literally the exact same thing you're asking for... making Ornithomimus 100% redundant...
The hologram of the Indominus shows various animals added to its DNA, including various abelisaurs and even Deinosuchus, although I can't make out certain parts... Therizinosaurus might be in there, but I can't say for sure.Are you sure? I could've sworn Jack Horner or somebody said that's where it's long claws came from.
Being the type genus of its family doesn't change the fact that, from a gameplay perspective, the most important aspect of a game, a Struthiomimus with a feathered variant is 100% exactly what you're asking for... which still makes Ornithomimus 100% redundant...I only chose Ornithomimus because it's the type genus of it's family. It's really weird to me that it hasn't gotten any attention from the franchise and I'd love to have a traditional Ornithomimusaurid with feathers.
I only chose Ornithomimus because it's the type genus of it's family. It's really weird to me that it hasn't gotten any attention from the franchise and I'd love to have a traditional Ornithomimusaurid with feathers.
Point takenOrnithomimus might have received attention in the 14th Land Before Time film.
As of now, we have enough ornithomimid species. The only species that is viable to be added is Pelecanimimus.
Yeah, really don't get this stuff... you do all remember this is a park builder? And not a first-person action adventure?Imagine if multiplayer mode exists for JWE3 (and if proper first-person mode, such as carnivore kill animations towards POV players, exists for the game), maybe playable animals would be a thing (even though this is unlikely), like the mod that Bestinslot reviewed for JWE2:Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbXOfYe_AtY
personally i want a rework for ACROCANTHOSAURUS and CARCHARODONTOSAURUS, maybe like JPOG.
![]()
![]()
JWE3 SPECIES LIST (personal list)
-ICHTHYOVENATOR
-PROTOCERATOPS
-PLATEOSAURUS
-BECKLESPINAX
-MIRAGAIA
-RUGOPS
-TORVOSAURUS
-SHANTUNGOSAURUS
-YANGCHUANOSAURUS
-DIABLOCERATOPS
AVIARY:
-NYCTOSAURUS
-PTERODAUSTRO
-MICRORAPTOR
-ARCHAEOPTERYX
But the spines of Acrocanthosaurus don't stick out... they're covered in musculature, making them more like a meaty fin.@Detective_D1no I would like to see the spines sticking out in Acrocanthosaurus and the head has to be more carcharodontosaurid than tyrannosaur.
Sigh... we really, REALLY don't need the Concavenator 2.0... even if it wasn't a totally unrecognized genus...Besides the Becklespinax, there is no telling what other species will be included in a Chaos Theory DLC.
Unless I missed something, I'm thinking (hoping?) by small aviaries and fences, he means smaller versions of normal containment stuff for smaller animals... and not dumbing down small animals for some silly exhibit animal system.Even if Archaeopteryx and Microraptor are to be added, which category would those two be in. Aviary or a viewing gallery attraction like the Compy?