List of Earth-like worlds, v3

I've added trojans into the rarity calculation, and that boosted Wabash's ELW to the highest rarity score. However, if all 12 candidates (see here) turned out to be trojans and they were all on the list, then the record would go back to ReggieNoble's previous one.
So, anyone fancy a trip? :D
 
Well, I would say they really are trojan systems, because to get into that list three parameters need to be (almost) equal and a fourth needs to have a difference of 60 degrees. The chance that this happens by chance AND it is an ELW is … well … really really … really really … really really … really really really low. ;)
So i would say nobody needs to go there to confirm it … trust the data.
 
I'd say "trust and verify", but the main thing is not all twelve candidates found on EDSM are here on the list, only four of them are.
 
System namePlanet IDDist. from Sol (ly)First discovered byContributed bySystem star(s) typeRinged EL?MoonsScreenshot URLNotesXYZ
Dumbaa XW-Q c19-3402123309.24141SOYLENT HESTONK1 VABFALSE0 Source: https://imgur.com/gOygAOj-4707.8125392.1562522825.5
Zunoae IR-C c13-6192224028.0886SOYLENT HESTONK3 VABFALSE1 Source: https://imgur.com/1iGKdeMELW has a landable moon-3182.125256.7523815.0625
Myriesly FR-L c21-3435125468.63812SOYLENT HESTONG9 VABFALSE0 Source: https://imgur.com/lRqcFt6-566.437536.312525462.3125

I'm back after a two-year vacation in Colonia. I discovered three ELW's on the way to Sag A. Let me know if I did this right.
 
Last edited:
I'd say "trust and verify" […].

This is a slight variation of a russion proverb ("trust, but verify") which is accredited to W.I. Lenin … But then, considering your pseudonym, you may have heard him say that … just kidding ;)

[…] the main thing is not all twelve candidates found on EDSM are here on the list, only four of them are.
I may not understand this.
So we have Orvidius list with the ELW's in trojan systems but just four of them are in your list of ELW's. Is that it?
If yes, I have the same problem. Orvidius seems to have an additional datasource and mostly always very up to date data (I think), while I use just the EDSM bodies.json file which is updated just every second week.
But then, as I said, I may misunderstand the actual problem.
 
Marx is talking about his calculations for the comparative rarity of different types of ELW planets. With only three or four members in the subset, "Trojan ELWs" are now one of the rarest categories, and the new "rarest ELW" is the Pipe (stem) Trojan with a score of 99.16, because of the combination of Trojan-ness and other rare things like the number of moons. But if more Trojans were added to the list, then their (comparative) rarity goes down.

Marx's database is a fairly small subset of the total known ELWs, as it is compiled only from contributors here on the forum and who have posted the required information in this thread (or its predecessor). It's currently at 16,200 planets - much smaller than the data-dump lists. When I did the comparison to see if any of Orvidius' twelve hits were in the ELW list, I expected maybe one or two, if any. Finding four was unexpected.

The list in this thread is older, but it grows slower than the EDSM list due to the smaller number of participants. There is a lot of overlap between EDSM and this list, but there are still some planets in this list (mainly the older ones which predate the invention of EDSM) which haven't made it into EDSM yet.
 
@ SoylentHeston: Welcome! Sure, it looks almost all good. The one missing thing is the star class, since you left out the full classification. What we use here is the exact same as appears on the galaxy map, so for example, "K3 VAB". I can look that up though, since it's just three systems now.


This is a slight variation of a russion proverb ("trust, but verify") which is accredited to W.I. Lenin … But then, considering your pseudonym, you may have heard him say that … just kidding ;)
Nah, I actually haven't heard of it. Haven't heard Lenin say anything either :D (Would have been a big surprise.) And it seems like people always forget about Groucho.
Well anyway, back on topic:

If yes, I have the same problem. Orvidius seems to have an additional datasource and mostly always very up to date data (I think), while I use just the EDSM bodies.json file which is updated just every second week.
There isn't just bodies.json, but also bodies7days.json. You can grab more up-to-date data from there, without always having to download the entire dump.

Also, to add a bit about what Sapyx has said, consider this: on a rough average, around 250 ELWs get added here every month. On EDSM, more than 5000, so twenty times as many. The list was made before EDSM, and with the latest additions on the April update, the game logs almost everything that's on here now, so there isn't much of a reason to keep it around anymore. But there are only a few people submitting, so it's not a lot of work.
 
With only three or four members in the subset, "Trojan ELWs" are now one of the rarest categories, and the new "rarest ELW" is the Pipe (stem) Trojan with a score of 99.16, because of the combination of Trojan-ness and other rare things like the number of moons.

Suddenly regretting my cherry-picking ways!

adds Trojan ELW to The List
 
If yes, I have the same problem. Orvidius seems to have an additional datasource and mostly always very up to date data (I think), while I use just the EDSM bodies.json file which is updated just every second week.

There isn't just bodies.json, but also bodies7days.json. You can grab more up-to-date data from there, without always having to download the entire dump.

That's basically how I'm getting my data. I built the database using the large bodies.json, and then keep it up to date by importing the bodies7days.json every two days. Occasionally I've had to re-sync from the large bodies.json again when I discover that I missed something, like rings on stars, or surface pressure (that last two cases that required such a large sync).
 
Fixed!

@ SoylentHeston: Welcome! Sure, it looks almost all good. The one missing thing is the star class, since you left out the full classification. What we use here is the exact same as appears on the galaxy map, so for example, "K3 VAB". I can look that up though, since it's just three systems now.
 
Another small batch.

System namePlanet IDDist. from Sol (ly)First discovered byContributed bySystem star(s) typeRinged EL?MoonsScreenshot URLComment
Hypou Aoscs CP-R d4-2217622573.07foobaron76foobaron76A7 VIno0http://yurusanai.de/pub/elw/elw288.jpg
Eol Prou EA-F c12-94ABC 122064.26foobaron76foobaron76K1 VAB, L0 V, T5 V, M6 VA, M9 VIno0http://yurusanai.de/pub/elw/elw289.jpg
Eol Prou NR-V d2-1118C 521820.73foobaron76foobaron76F8 VAB, M0 VA, G1 VABno0http://yurusanai.de/pub/elw/elw290.jpg
Eord Flyuae IL-O c22-212119236.95foobaron76foobaron76G5 VABno0http://yurusanai.de/pub/elw/elw291.jpgplanet 4 is AW
Byaa Ain WP-W d2-696516630.17foobaron76foobaron76F0 VBno1http://yurusanai.de/pub/elw/elw292.jpg
 
Have been on shore leave for a while. Finally getting ready to head back out so getting ship shape.

System namePlanet IDDist. from Sol (ly)First discovered byContributed bySystem star(s) typeRinged EL?MoonsScreenshot URLNotes
Blaa Eork AH-T d4-852435.08GipperArtemus BranchF2 VBNoNohttps://photos.app.goo.gl/9pP6judrXu8A7UEY9
Drojia BU-E c363576.76HazarethArtemus BranchG5 VABNoNohttps://photos.app.goo.gl/Jogc1CjRFE5gM2418
Gru Eork ZL-T d4-15A54274.14XXSNAKEEYEZ39XXArtemus BranchF9 VB, M3 VANoNohttps://photos.app.goo.gl/Gdg9azdyyMT9xGEu7
Blaa Dryou KY-Y d1-10A45786.76Artemus BranchA9 VB, G2 VABNoNohttps://photos.app.goo.gl/HXJ4Mb1Rn6dV4dXZ8
Blaa Dryou KY-Y d1-10A55786.76Artemus BranchA9 VB, G2 VABNo1https://photos.app.goo.gl/2UQJ93MycAFM3WK59
Pyroifeia CW-C d101AB19709.71Artemus BranchG2 VAB, M2 VANoNohttps://photos.app.goo.gl/MteTi1RMtbXXkzes6
Traileia QX-L d7-140B611963.51Artemus BranchA4 VI, K8 VA, F3 VBNoNohttps://photos.app.goo.gl/j3kHdvRiHXEygCMC6
Blaa Dryou WE-X d2-90AB46339.30Artemus BranchF2 VB, K5 VAB, K4 VANoNohttps://photos.app.goo.gl/1wjrFL8qzxcVDech8
Byooe Euq HT-Z c13-16BC716482.01Artemus BranchG5 VAB, K6 VA, M4 VANoNohttps://photos.app.goo.gl/aWdZ5GFaXM9d3HxN9
Byooe Euq CQ-G d10-54A417288.41Artemus BranchF3 VI, M2 VA, L2 VNoNohttps://photos.app.goo.gl/hBuTigyj7uoyYkAZ9
Pria Aihm PY-I d9-4A425008.49Artemus BranchG4 VAB, M0 VANoNohttps://photos.app.goo.gl/s1ES4yxGLN3LGYZR6
Bleou Aewsy RQ-S c18-0AB224299.96Artemus BranchG8 VAB, M0 VA, M5 VANoNohttps://photos.app.goo.gl/Wc244BA9Fpfbvw7HA
Pueliae WY-L c22-0BC422746.50FlectorArtemus BranchG7 VAB, K5 VA, M0 VANoNohttps://photos.app.goo.gl/TCeJKzVGozpzFaUN6
Eorm Aod TP-M d8-7520143.23Artemus BranchF7 VBNoNohttps://photos.app.goo.gl/fiJT4w7CDacWoJKF7
Phoi Aod MI-B d5534A623649.23Artemus BranchA6 VAB, M0 VAYesNohttps://photos.app.goo.gl/2s3caXoB8zZ3xKpT8
Myrielk NP-E c25-6072A525654.26Artemus BranchG3 VAB, G5 VABNoNohttps://photos.app.goo.gl/9Yn9TVDRYYZ135TS9
\
 
Exact type of star(s) in the system: for example, K2 VAB. In case you aren't sure how to find this, check this post.
Your in-game name: CMDR if submitting multiple planets, no need to put it next to every entry


Where do you obtain the extended type of star information? The listed post link from the first page is broken.
 

Attachments

  • Dryooe Prou QX-V a15-10()_00001.jpg
    Dryooe Prou QX-V a15-10()_00001.jpg
    675.1 KB · Views: 250
Last edited:
Where do you obtain the extended type of star information? The listed post link from the first page is broken.
Ah, thanks for letting me know! I'll dig that post up again. (The search function isn't very helpful with that though.) In the meantime, it's on the galaxy map, as Klepto has already posted.
 
Top Bottom