I really should go back and grab the screenies and system info, but this system name reminded me of a couple of systems I ran across not too far from yours that each had binary pairs...
Nyeajaae EI-R d5-3
Nyeajoa WF-D d13-0
It's probably just statistical clustering, but there are two other systems in the Errors database in the Nyeaj Region with multiple ELWS: I was looking for some interesting waypoints to aim for on my next leg, so I've just stopped off at them to scan them; the List only has screenshots of one in each system. So here they are; I haven't used the table format, since all the data is correct for the system except for the missing screenshots:
NYEAJEE SY-Z d36 - This system has a very rare trinary co-orbital set of ELWs. It might even be worth flagging as a tourist beacon for that reason, but the view from here isn't all that spectacular - the planets are too far apart (see the screenshot below). The system map looks quite spectacular, though. This was one of Glyn-ie's original contributions, but there was only a screenshot of one of the planets. So planet 5 is already on the List, but planets 3 and 4 are on the Errors list as "missing screenshot". Well, here they all are:
NYEAJEE SY-Z d36 3:
http://i.imgur.com/P31vx10.png
NYEAJEE SY-Z d36 4:
http://i.imgur.com/oh5WzBu.png
NYEAJEE SY-Z d36 5:
http://i.imgur.com/edkEcwE.png (already on List)
Tourist notes: Besides the oddness of having three ELWs co-orbiting each other, each world has uniqueness of their own. Planet 3 has identical mass and temperature to Earth but a tidally-locked day 153 days long, while planet 4 has one of the highest parallel-Earth scores I've observed, with identical surface gravity, average temperature and volcanism. Planet 5 is, by contrast, a hot jungle planet.
NYEAJEAU IL-W d2-17 - This system is unlikely to attract colonists and visitors, despite the multiple ELWs, because they're all around the third star, 115,000 Ls away. Only two of the planets are ELWs, the third outermost planet is a terraformable WW, it might pay the same but doesn't make it onto the List. Again, Planet C 7 is already on the List, Planet C 6 is on the Errors with "Missing Screenshot".
NYEAJEAU IL-W d2-17 C 6:
http://i.imgur.com/OReQV2l.png
NYEAJEAU IL-W d2-17 C 7:
http://i.imgur.com/193TkDa.png (already on List)
NYEAJEAU IL-W d2-17 C 7 a:
http://i.imgur.com/JfYD2ON.png (stats for the landable moon)
Tourist notes: Having two ELWs orbiting an M-class star is rather rare, I'd imagine, and would be very rare indeed for non-co-orbiting worlds around a solitary M-class star. In this system, the G-class primary star is too remote to contribute, but star B is also G class and only 5100 Ls away, which presumably helps make the outer reaches of the M star warm enough for life. These two worlds are definitely a contrast: C6 is hot, not too humid for the temperature, with rather large landmasses, so I'd hazard a guess it would qualify more as "desert planet" than "jungle planet"; C7 is much colder, but the matching atmospheric pressure should make Earthlings feel at home, as would the moon being the same size in the sky as the sun (though both moon and sun are a bit closer than on Earth); I didn't get a real good picture, as the moon was new at the time I flew past:
@ Sapyx: I think this popped up elsewhere recently too, but in cases where the ELW-s have a binary pair (any kind of planet), then the game will list the orbital period, SMA and tidal lock towards the common barycenter they both orbit, and not towards the star. As such, since the length of days depends on the rotation relative to the star, being tidally locked to something else won't necessarily mean that days will last for weeks. Also, in multiple-star systems things are often more varied, as depending on the system's configuration, day-night cycles can become quite complex. I'd recommend checking the Orrery view on
Elite Galaxy Online to get a better idea as to how this would work. (Frontier have said that they don't plan on implementing multiple star light sources yet, as it would be too computationally demanding.)
Yes, I know; my point was, most of the co-orbiting tidally-locked ELWs
I've seen have had such remote orbits that (a) the co-orbiting planet isn't very scenic, and (b) the day length is correspondingly long. I was pleasantly surprised by this one.