Modes Mode Feature Exclusivity...AKA..."Render unto Caesar..."

Locking it into Open, along with all the other changes Sandro suggested, would be welcome. Open Only PP isn’t an idea in a vacuum, remember.

It's only Welcome by those looking for more targets to shoot at.
Which would be the same people who drove those soft targets out of open in the first place.

That's why some people are just using PP as a way to bypass C&P, it opens up more "emergent gameplay"
 
It's true that there has been four years of screaming on the forum, from the PvP crowd. Probably because they haven't received a single feature where their preferred activity has any function at all.

Personally I don't care that much for PvP in ED. It's poorly implemented in my opinion and there are no indications of change. I still think that making PP a PvP platform could improve Open in general.

I think the current mode system is close to perfect. I use all three modes actively. Making PP Open only would not change that at all.

That's to be expected, ED has no focus on PvP to begin with.
 
Its pathetic to look at from the outside; there's no wonder the reddit community mocks the forums as a whole.
That's harsh towards the reddit forum. I would think twice before attributing characteristics to a forum as a whole. And be adviced that you're a part of this forum as a whole.

I'm sure you can find the kind of comments you described here, but if through selective observations you use those comment to typify a very diverse community as this forum holds, again I remind you you're a part of it as well, you are being dishonest in your characterisation of this forum.
forum consensus
There's no such thing.
 
Last edited:
Commendable sentiments, I'm sure.

However, how fair is it that I,or any PvP consumer, are 'sullied' (or tarred with the same brush) because of other PvP individuals and enthusiasts? It smacks of stereotyping and bias.

It's not fair, but life isn't fair regardless of whether it's real or in a videogame. Also, I was more attempting to correct a potential misunderstanding in that most of the folks participating on the forums when referring to griefers etc. are talking about the 2nd and 3rd groupages rather than the first. I only speak for myself here when I say I have the utmost respect and empathy for the 1st groupage - no one sensible objects to direct PvP if it's within context of the game, rather than just treating the game like it's CQC: Galaxy Arena.


You posted a limited broad brush list of PvP motivating factors, with the last 2 being contentious for PvEers (I do PvE stuff as well - I'm 100% sure all PvPers do PvE).

As a broad brush it serves the purposes of this conversation, otherwise you'd be asking me to write some thesis on the matter and I ain't got time for that ;)

I can only say that under the proposal the 'blasters' will now be able to be part of a deeper context in what should be a target rich environment of PP. This could take pressure off CGs, engineer systems, Founders world, ruins and any other 'hot spot'. The boys and girls who live for the fight for fighting's sake are likely to be tempted to join a power to get their fix. The powers will benefit by having combat focused pilots fighting for them. Seems sensible to introduce OoPP with this in mind.

That is indeed one of the Pro's for the proposal and that's well understood.


Going after a weak target? I'm afraid there is nothing wrong with that in a PP context. Other Powers are enemies, allies or neutrals.

Indeed.


(I'm ambivalent about non PP contexts because: a) Choose your mode. b) Dress appropriately.) If an attacking CMDR bit off more than they could chew with what they thought was a weak target, no real shame in crumbling (waking out) and probably a good youtube video to boot. Certainly some exciting gameplay to be had.
Combat logging is cheating in any circumstance. There is no justification for it. PvP, PvE, open, solo or PG - it's cheating. Clogging is worse in PvP though as you are directly affecting another player. I hope the Karma system is also on the cooker.

Also in 100% complete agreement with you on this :)

One last point, if I may. Most players don't PvP, from a devs post nearly 2 years ago - the question should be asked, why don't they PvP? Maybe they would if an in-game context was available to do so. The huge game map makes encounters slim, unless at a hotspot. This might be what FDev are currently gunning for with the proposal - a potential for meaningful PvP via PP.

That is one possibility.

However, I know why I don't PvP. I don't PvP because it's just not an activity I find fun. I personally backed ED in 2014 becuase I wanted to play an Elite game, having grown up with the original Elite games. I wanted to fly spaceships and play Elite in much the same way that I did back then - i.e. as a single-player open world game with NPC's and things to explore and do.

Playing with other people is not what I want to do much, though let it be noted that I have indeed played ED with other players a number of times, and mostly enjoyed the times that I did, but, what I don't particularly find enjoyable is direct pew-pew PvP. It's simply not a fun, enjoyable nor interesting thing for me to do. So I don't.

Well, technically I have PvP'ed before - once when I was blown up for no in-game context in Open in Shinrarta Dezhra a couple of years ago. Another time was when I made a bunch of grifers at a Barnacle site enraged because I was taunting them at first from my hidden SRV and then from my extremely fast engineered iEagle. I was recently also blown up in Open when in my Anaconda which was outfitted for AX weapons and the scoundrel (they know who they are! ;) ) who did it had been pretending to fight a Thargoid which had been kited to nearby a starport, who then basically just backstabbed me. Lessons learned there were many, including players in Open can be right old Richards ;)

But on the whole, I take no pleasure in direct-pew-pew-PvP. It's boring as hell - speaking for myself.
 
Its all well and good breaking down the groups into three nice categories, however it doesn't stop what happens here, for example:

Player pirates (proper ones... remember them?) were put into that third box, despite obvious issues.

Those definitely go into the first group for me. And I'll just say that there have been players or groups of players who pretended to be roleplaying pirates but turns out they were flying meta-ships with no cargo holds. Basically, it was those types there who gave the RP Pirates a bad name. In fact, Frontier are to blame for this for killing off Piracy at birth becuase they didn't write any code whatsoever to make Piracy an official career (e.g. no Declaration of Piracy mechanic has ever been added).

PvP Groups that RP/Played the BGS (for example, 13th legion who opposed, blockaded and shut down many a pro federal CG).... again its "you're roleplaying wrong... its just an excuse to grief."

Again, right from the start, Powerplay has always given a purpose for PvP, but it was never touted as the only reason for playing Powerplay. And there has always been a choice to Powerplay in Open, PG, or Solo, and frankly if anyone chooses to Powerplay in Open, they are consenting to the Powerplay direct-pewpew PvP, as far as I'm concerned. However, Sandro is proposing to remove the choice of playing Powerplay in Solo or PG, and that's a problem.


That has been the overall tone since day one of full release, remember when pirates who wanted your cargo were psychoanalysed, accused of being RL terrorists/rapists who lived in their parents basements, and all the stuff the forum consensus persists in throwing at anyone who doesnt play in a non 100% e-bushido dueling manner.

Not something I ever said - I always held the belief that playing in Open meant you could be waylayed by player Pirates, so, I can't speak for those few forumites who thought the way you describe above. Also, as stated by me earlier in this reponse, there were and still are players who pretend to be pirates but are just out to blast away - much in the same manner as those pretending to be ships in distress with no fuel, calling out the Fuel Rats, and ambushing the Fuel Rat concerned. In other words, the Richards of the game are spoiling it for everyone else.

And here's the rub... when you put your cards on the table (like the PPers have done these past weeks) all of a sudden its 'ulterior motives' and shadowplay: 'youre a false account created by an SDC member' type nonsense, or my perennial favourite in threads where Ive tried to offer advice to a player who wants to continue in open but is suffering difficulties 'dont listen to him, hes just a griefer who wants to keep easy prey in open' (which couldnt be further from the truth).

Again, not something I personally have ever said on the forums, or even about your good self :)
 
It's only Welcome by those looking for more targets to shoot at.
Which would be the same people who drove those soft targets out of open in the first place.

That's why some people are just using PP as a way to bypass C&P, it opens up more "emergent gameplay"

Not quite true. There are some who profess to want to be shot at as well.
 
Not quite true. There are some who profess to want to be shot at as well.

As far as I'm aware, they are already in Open mode getting shot at.
So there is no need to change the game, as they can get what they want now.

And if they are not feeling enough pain in open, I believe 50 shades is available on Netflix for them to stream while they do it. :p
 
Dont kinkshame. What Jason and I get up to in open is none of your damn business.

What I really want to know is how Jockey knew about it in the first place. Please, do tell. :p

All joking aside, I find a lot of the back and forth here a bit OT.
 
And it seems we're "off to the races" with a second PP proposal that does not include MFE.

Apparently Sandro IS indeed listening. :)

Still want to know how Jockey seems to know about Goose and Jason's proclivities toward kink in Open, however. :D
 
It's only Welcome by those looking for more targets to shoot at.

Go look at the latest FF thread and the outpouring of support for Open Only PP. Surely they're not all just 'looking for more targets to shoot.' Heck, I'm one of those people.

Stop lying, Jockey. Your ‘legal background’ is showing.
 
Last edited:
Go look at the latest FF thread and the outpouring of support for Open Only PP

Stop lying, Jockey. Your ‘legal background’ is showing.

Funny how you miss the outpouring of comments against it in both the threads.
Weird that. How you only see one thing yet accuse others of that.

Sorry, only liar here is you. Anyone can see page after page of mixed replies.

Also funny how Frontier are looking back at the open bonuses option, the one that was dismissed - is back on the table in place of locked content.
Oh, but without the special little toys attached.

This is golden, it really is.
 
Funny how you miss the outpouring of comments against it in both the threads.
Weird that. How you only see one thing yet accuse others of that.

Anyone can see page after page of mixed replies.


Can't argue with that. The vast majority of the responses occupy a spectrum of "Yeah", "h yeah", and "f yeah!".

Wondrous variety!
 
Can't argue with that. The vast majority of the responses occupy a spectrum of "Yeah", "h yeah", and "f yeah!".

Wondrous variety!

Right? :D

The other side isn't so much an outpouring as that Dutch kid with a thumb hanging out down by the dikes wondering if it's worth it at this stage.
 
Last edited:
Can't argue with that. The vast majority of the responses occupy a spectrum of "Yeah", "h yeah", and "f yeah!".

Wondrous variety!

Quite a few "no", "h no" and "f no".
A few "meh" posts as well.

But what I love is how Sandro is trying to find middle ground and getting told, open only or don't bother.....
really shows the lack of willingness to compromise from those PvP/PP supporters - you know, the ones who claim they will compromise, but clearly won't.
 
Back
Top Bottom