To me it is just another proof that "Engineers" was a piece of jobbie.
Quite possibly - but we are where we are..
Module Storage
- Thread starter Audaxxx
- Start date
-
- Tags
- modules outfitting storage
Quite possibly - but we are where we are..
Ah, the joys of Min-Max'ing to within 0.001% !!! Just imagine...if another Player had a module which performed 0.1% better than yours...ouch ! The Trauma...
stormyuk
Volunteer Moderator
Gameplay reasons just makes no sense to me, 60 is just too low. No matter how much is available, people will always want more sure but, adding more and more ships to the game, it makes sense to also increase module storage levels.
Just imagine if they released another ship and a tech broker where you can get many more modules, this on top of the ship they released a couple of months ago and ax modules.
100s of ships?
If true, that strikes me as a bit odd and definitely an outlier. I can not see any logical reason why anyone playing this game would need to own that many ships. Storage or otherwise, you've got issues.
I can tell you why #engineering. Because sometimes you dont know if the RNG is good or bad or an effect worth saving, and also modules for roles for ships. Maybe a light weight build etc for piracy, specific modules - they also have different core component sizes.. weapons with myriads of effects.
I would welcome more module storage so I dont have to keep buying dropships/cobras to put things in.
Would also greatly welcome some sort of folder arrangement system for them, ones you could name would be even better so you dont have to scroll through 59/60 items to find that one thing.
Its a wish though would be lovely but not going to be holding feet to fire over it.
EDIT: I forgot to mention ax-weaponry compounded this matter for me :<
I'm a PVEer...
There's no common sense involved when you're storing lots of stuff that you don't need.
So they are introducing all these "tech broker" goodies and we are already at max storage plus x amount of Anacondas lying around as storage. Yeah, that's not going to end well. When you manage a fleet of ships 60 is nowhere near enough.
Can we please at least get a storage limit of 120 modules, just double what we have?
..and no there won't be another post in 6 months asking for double the storage again, unless the galaxy gets twice the number of galactic powers in powerplay.
How many people who are saying the current limit is fine either don't engineer anything or don't use powerplay modules, or both?
Can we please at least get a storage limit of 120 modules, just double what we have?
..and no there won't be another post in 6 months asking for double the storage again, unless the galaxy gets twice the number of galactic powers in powerplay.
How many people who are saying the current limit is fine either don't engineer anything or don't use powerplay modules, or both?
Last edited:
No harm in increasing module storage, they can always add a price for it, say 1 to 5 million per module and cap it to 100ish.
many of us with 11 digit in cr get another sink.
many of us with 11 digit in cr get another sink.
You must visit the supermarket on a daily basis.
You don't know you need something......until you need it
But I know when I don't need things.
OMG, does he not realise there's players out there that have literally 100s of ships just for storage?!
I'm currently on about 50/60, I'm gonna have to buy a t10 soon, just for storage purposes.
Yup - I could open a used Anaconda sales lot.
IMO a limit to module storage only pigeonholes people into limiting the amount of ships they own or fly.
Not everyone believes in the "one ship, one style" game play option. Some like to fly many different ships in many different locations... which should also be allowed.
There's really no "good" reason to limit module storage, as it's not carried with you wherever you go- the modules are still located at the places you purchase them, and to transfer them it requires paying for transfer as well as a timer.
Not everyone believes in the "one ship, one style" game play option. Some like to fly many different ships in many different locations... which should also be allowed.
There's really no "good" reason to limit module storage, as it's not carried with you wherever you go- the modules are still located at the places you purchase them, and to transfer them it requires paying for transfer as well as a timer.
There is no logic to your statement. I need to eat.
And I need to outfit ships. Logic is in avoiding unnecessary engineer (supermarket) trips.
For example i have some modules with very good engineering rolls but they are not in use .
When i go Thargoid hunting in new ship i buy much more equipment just in case my build is not working and i have make changes . Running around few hundreds LY back and forth is painfull , and my taxi can't take all modules on board , so add time to fly there, buy , fly back , transfer modules and we have hours of gameplay lost .
60 is simply not enough . Just add option to buy more storage space for CR , as people ssaid , they spend milions just to have storage ships , so give more storage space that cost idk , 1 mil per slot could be enough , after lets say 20 slots make it 2 mil per slot etc
I've been guilty of a little pack-ratting myself from time to time, then I sit and I look at what I have stored away and I ask myself the same question:
"If this module is so good that I want to keep it, why isn't on a ship?"
If I can't answer that, I sell it. It's good for the budget, it's good for the storage space, and it's good for me.
"If this module is so good that I want to keep it, why isn't on a ship?"
If I can't answer that, I sell it. It's good for the budget, it's good for the storage space, and it's good for me.