I so wish FDEV didn't leave us hanging reagarding the stats of the Panther for another month. This thread and the totally bonkers wishful thinking and speculation need to end and be replaced by facts, yesterday.
Even if the facts were available the bonkers wishful thinking and speculation would still continue, they might be slightly toned down if we were lucky.I so wish FDEV didn't leave us hanging reagarding the stats of the Panther for another month. This thread and the totally bonkers wishful thinking and speculation need to end and be replaced by facts, yesterday.
Why is it so utterly urgent?I so wish FDEV didn't leave us hanging reagarding the stats of the Panther for another month. This thread and the totally bonkers wishful thinking and speculation need to end and be replaced by facts, yesterday.
Facetious...
ETA: But my wallet still won't open if the capacity isn't actually worthwhile. (and 1500-2K is not, in my opinion)
Because I've watched this growing over 10 years and now FDEV are further stalling.Why is it so utterly urgent?
Not really stalling. They tease a poc ship that the community has been asking for. Teasers never come with 100% of the final specs/info.Because I've watched this growing over 10 years and now FDEV are further stalling.
After 10 years, I think we can wait for one measly month more.Because I've watched this growing over 10 years and now FDEV are further stalling.
You’re advocating patience? On the internet? Are you new?!After 10 years, I think we can wait for one measly month more.
And all the other ships followed the formula: Tease in month 1, reveal stats in month 2, put up for ARX in month 3. I just hope it's because they haven't fully finalized what it'll be yet.Not really stalling. They tease a poc ship that the community has been asking for. Teasers never come with 100% of the final specs/info.
They've done the same with p mk2, t8, c mk 5, mandalay and corsair.
Teasing, yes. Stalling, no.
Possibly they need to see all the dreams of us forumites so they can decide which features to tweak to mine the most salt.And all the other ships followed the formula: Tease in month 1, reveal stats in month 2, put up for ARX in month 3. I just hope it's because they haven't fully finalized what it'll be yet.
Possibly they need to see all the dreams of us forumites so they can decide which features to tweak to mine the most salt.
Make it 2K+ but also so it only has four optional slots that can fit a new 512 tonne capacity cargo rack.Oh, it's easy: make it 2K+ so all the people who want it are happy, and people who want less can simply load less.
There, I helped FDevs.
EDIT:
damn, you wanted the most salt - then all this in reverse![]()
If they are taking notice of this thread, we will end up with 5t more than the Cutter / T-9 max, combined with the worst handling from both (so both sluggish & drifty) and a maximum jump off 11 LY with G5 engineering on its C6 FSD...Possibly they need to see all the dreams of us forumites so they can decide which features to tweak to mine the most salt.
...and again I'd like a pic of the Financial Office people's facesIf they are taking notice of this thread, we will end up with 5t more than the Cutter / T-9 max, combined with the worst handling from both (so both sluggish & drifty) and a maximum jump off 11 LY with G5 engineering on its C6 FSD...
sorry i coudnt resistBecause... I want it now!!!
![]()
Looks like you are pro binary and anti decimal. It's to late for this CMDR, he has already been indoctrinated by the Reapers.2048 MINIMUM
Or maybe it's because cargo racks always have a capacity that's a power of 2?Looks like you are pro binary and anti decimal. It's to late for this CMDR, he has already been indoctrinated by the Reapers.
That's no excuse, you can still mix and match different size cargo racks.Or maybe it's because cargo racks always have a capacity that's a power of 2?