To be fair, there's a bunch of bugs (which affect me) in EDH that weren't there before the EDO debacle, so one could argue that ED is 'worse' than it was a year ago.Actually, to go back to this image, that's the one for Odyssey, while here is the one for ED
View attachment 306861
But hold on, why has ED been getting hammered? ED hasn't changed by itself, its still the same game sans Odyssey. Games don't suddenly get worse when nothing is changing, only opinion.
So, i think both of these images tell a story.
There are those who don't like Odyssey, who blew their reviews on Odyssey in the early days, and now write negative reviews for ED, to keep sticking it to the man.
Meanwhile, those who can play Odyssey (which not everyone can, due to performance) seem to be in part enjoying it.
I've talked about this before. When i couldn't run Odyssey well, it wasn't fun. If i was the sort of person who writes reviews, i would have given it a negative review because of the performance. When i could actually play it, i actually enjoyed it, and would have given it a positive review, even if it does have a few warts.
I suspect, given another year or so, when the salty ones have run out of reviews, and as long as FD don't drop the ball again, both Odyssey and base game will revert to positive recent reviews, and maybe, eventually, in overall reviews as well for Odyssey.
Anyone who bought ED in the Easter sale is going to have that experience and they're theoretically the people most likely to be leaving reviews recently. Additionally, anyone who bought ED+EDO as a new player is most likely going to review the package as a whole under ED.
So, maybe?