Still doesn't change the fact that MWO is a PvP game where you can have a Flea fighting against a Dire Wolf, so it still flies in the face of the OP's original question.
PVP in ED? Enough already, this isn't a PVP game. Forums plugged up, too much.
- Thread starter Crumly
- Start date
I didn't say the OP's assertion wasn't nonsense, just acknowledging that I haven't been paying much attention to Mechwarrior 5.
I know. I didn't phrase that right. I not good a making wordy sentences sometimes
![[PS4] Filthymick420](https://forums-cdn.zaonce.net/data/avatars/m/201/201444.jpg?1555738739){kind=avatar}
what do you mean, "technically"? you were wrong and that's it, don't try to act otherwise. technically. lol. as a side note, last mech game i played i loved so much, mech assault. nostalgia. first xbox live game that had multiplayer pvp IIRC, or unreal championship.
are there magically cargo mech's in MW? I haven't played since 2002, I don't remember non combat mechs in the games though? Or any mechs that' aren't meant for PVP? Or titanfall? The little titans have no balance vs the big ones? Elite has nothing. It allows pvp combat, doesn't make it any kind of meaningful pvp game (aside from CQC)
The unabridged version was much more interestingWell this thread certainly merited the.
The unabridged version was much more interesting
I'm sorry I missed that. Damn you, sleep!
Way to act like a total clown
Calling Morbad a liar, telling everyone their opinion is just wrong. The arrogance on display here is breath taking.
Last edited:
Unfortunately its a common theme, just because some rando doesnt personally indulge in pvp they think its fine to invalidate the players that do.
The fact is there are thousands that pvp for their slice of fun, regardless of claims to the contrary.
These players dont look to invalidate trading, exploring, goids etc, they would just like to see some meaninfull additions to pvp gameplay, hence all the threads.
To blithely dismiss these players, call them wrong and undermine their choice of playstyle based on your own preferences is the height of arrogance.
The fact is there are thousands that pvp for their slice of fun, regardless of claims to the contrary.
These players dont look to invalidate trading, exploring, goids etc, they would just like to see some meaninfull additions to pvp gameplay, hence all the threads.
To blithely dismiss these players, call them wrong and undermine their choice of playstyle based on your own preferences is the height of arrogance.
And there you go, assuming the majority of those in open play need or want PvP. But deflect to the solo players if it makes you feel better, I guess. This isn't EvE, most people here, regardless of mode, aren't looking for a gankfest simulator.
OP, you made me fling a "like" to Robert "Maynardbot" Maynard for his response to your rant.
Do you have any idea what that takes?
Do you have any idea what that takes?
As in strictly speaking, but not in essence.
Nine out of ten games proves my point just as well as ten out of ten would have.
What makes CQC more meaningful than either organized or organic PvP in the main game? I've played a fair bit of it all, and I sure wouldn't use 'meaningful' to describe CQC.
Actually, balanced doesn't really come to mind either:
Ooooh I'm loving this thread so much. Dude your arrogance is so strong theres almost a purity to it and its hilarious.
So how did it happen? Were you flying a cargo ship and got jumped or were you actively trying to gank people youself and got the Raxxla beat out of you? I'm betting on the second scenario.
And I'm not here for gangfest. And I don't like gangfest. If the game was based on Pvp destroying each other I would not play it. Maybe you don't know, but EVE isn't based on gangfest. In a General sense, the term PvP can be used to describe any game or individual game aspect in which players compete against each other. Why do many people consider Pvp only the destruction of each other? Players can only compete and resist by destroying each other? I want a healthy atmosphere of open multiplayer, balanced, gambling and honest, but not based only on "destroying the player by the player".
In fact, I support the author of the topic. ED is not a Pvp game, but Pvp in the General sense is necessary for open play. Fdev does not see this problem for players who are concerned about the issue of Pvp and therefore these people have constantly raised and will raise this topic. I will clarify "They do not call solo players in an open game", they want that their open game mode, which differs from other modes just by the possibility of confrontation between players, was not forgotten.
Last edited:
I see a section in this forum...
mhmmm lets see how it is called....ah! "Playstyles; PVP, Powerplay, CQC " (Sorry, I couldn't resist <3)
Last edited:
Then, try suggesting something.
Something short of OO. I've been in this debate since the game's release. The only suggestion the Pro-PvP crowd ever makes insists, somehow, on forced participation in PvP. First it was 'drop Solo/PG', that went on forever, then after Sandro's 'handgrenade' (his description) the cry has become 'open only'. No other suggestions gets any traction from the PvP side. This is self defeating.
When the PvP crowd can conger up an idea that doesn't include forced participation, I'm sure the forums will see many get behind the idea. If for no reason other than to see the crying end.
I stopped reading there, because I'm 'inside the head' of anyone who would write such drivel, and already know what the rest of the post is going to say, because I read it when I was 37, some 20 years ago...