Not the same thing. They ALREADY had made a sea lion and a seal for the first game.
Hey. I love them. Is probably the animal i built for the most in pz1, but i don't consider them essential. An otter in general is essential for a zoo game, but not specifically the giant otter.
Well said!!
And yes, those 10 animals would make the roster a LOT better. You have my support. Where do I need to sign? 
The Mountain Lion carving angers me. What is the point of it? Where do I put it? Why would I need to use it if I can't place cougars in my zoo? Or the Macaque statues... Yes, you can make an area dedicated to Japan ig, with sakuras and whatnot (are they in the game?) but what for, when there are no animals that can be found in Japan? Not only the Macaques are absent, there is no Tanuki, no Red-Crowned Crane, not even the Red Fox and nothing new like the Sika Deer or the Japanese Serow either. Again, what is the point of macaque statues being in the game?
California Sea Lion was my absolutely top #1 most wanted animal and I genuinely expected it to return in the base game, what with the inclusion of aquariums and whatnot. This is what I get for getting my hopes up for once in my life lol.
they where proably where going to add it but just barely missed out, like I bet it will be one of the first returning dlc animals
Correctly it should be called "Old World wildlife park" then
Easy on the "A" word there
just sayign real flame and a strike in league of legends was enough to force riot give us our loot boxes back but i dont think this community has the back bone or passion for it
I dissagree. If some animals are that iconic that need to get scenery pieces then they should be included in the game along those pieces. Otherwise what is the point? Why would i care placing a cougar carving in a wall if said animal is no where to be seen. And i thought the same about the camels back then... They were so. Iconic that they make a saharan scenery set pack and have to includem in decorative items yet they don't bother to add them to said pack playing tease with the player base?
No, thats the thing, they are NOT done.
I don't believe that for a second. I highly doubt they have made everything from scratch as they claim. Some animals looking virtually the same is proof of that. And i doubt they would waste resources they arleady invested and make everything from zero again. That wouldn't be smart for maneging resources and reducing expenses either.
) Sure I can still make habitats for what I hope to return and knew that was probably going to be the case for an obscure animal like the Somali wild ass, but having to do that for the cheetah, grizzly, and American bison?? To be fair, the Japanese macaque statues are from the first game's East Asia theme, it would be weirder if they removed them.
From what I can see the Komodo Dragon is exactly the same too, down to the individual scales. And the Komodo Dragon was base game deluxe, no?
I was finally following a clear vision for my oldest project but I feel that I've lost the desire to play, sort of as a protest and due to feeling cheated. Then again, my goodwill isn't really affected because I still hadn't preordered and was waiting until the last week to make a decision, which now means they're not seeing another refund by me adding up to the grand total.
Ideally we should get both per theme, but since Frontier will always omit a popular choice or two, getting rid of both the actual animal and decorations seems like double the damage, while on the other hand I feel like decorations at least mitigate it a bit.
