Bob Lighthouse
Banned
Ok fine, so your position is your distinction is meaningless...
As a coach I knew used to say, "You got read like a dirty magazine."
Ok fine, so your position is your distinction is meaningless...
I bet that your next replies will have a variation of LOL, LMAO or hahaha somewhere.
Ermm, you made the distinction.
Y, U MAD?
It's hilarious watching you spin your wheels.
As I am allowed to.
If you want to equivocate that's not my problem.
I don't need to make a counter argument.
What is "Rulz" anyhow?
It sounds like it might be from, say, Eastern Europe?
If you don't want to, I made my case and proved that I'm indeed writing.
Meh, I'm not gonna fall for your bait, if you actually want to know, follow the rabbit and look it for yourself
And I suppose, "ok" is a title of some sort?
These are important matters.
What do you think of Africa's food production potential, Mr Rulz ok?
Parliament declares 'Climate Emergency' though what exactly that means is anyone's guess. Some are calling to go carbon neutral by 2030, though I doubt they've actually worked out what that will mean.
Climate Emergency declared
There you go LOL'ing again Bob. You'll have to do betterAnd you're way too predictable.
LOL
That's better, even though you still signed of with the lol. This time not in capital letters. I'll give you that.It doesn't surprise me that you cannot discern the component parts of an argument, given your fallacious diversions in this thread.
600 million hectares of "uncultivated, arable" land in Africa alone is quite a lot!
You are almost as bad as Greg, lol!
"...science is more than a body of knowledge. It's a way of thinking. A way of skeptically interrogating the universe with a fine understanding of human fallibility."
Carl Sagan
I'm not a farmer and honestly, a year ago I didn't care too much about agriculture, except that it causes a lot of disturbance to the biosphere. Then it became clear to me, that I eat food produced at a farm everyday, and so does everybody else. We need the farmers to survive, and they should be as popular as the fire brigade, even though they experience a lot of bashing.'Human influence on drought started a century ago':
Human influence on drought started a century ago
Aerosol pollution from the '50s to the '70s may have complicated the picture.arstechnica.com
In truth this is a little innacurate, as 'traditional' slash and burn has been used by various peoples around the world going back atleast a few thousand years (most likely much longer in some places) and while, for example, it has become a vital 'natural' cycle in some places (like Australia) where the local flora needs those fires to prompt plant growth, in many other places it has had a bad effect on the quality of the land. On the mainland in PNG, in particular around the capital Port Morsby, it has pretty much created a 'dead' natural environment, or a very poor one for a tropical zone.
So while the data in the article is interesting and relevant, we perhaps need to look deeper and wider into all our pasts to discover just how long we have been affecting local environments.
The big issue is that the harsh reality is that this is an politically agnostic problem, where as our political structures have a past that is excluding them from providing the united front we need on AGW. That division is nicely shown by the hard push for fracking under the Conservatives (and the many ex/current conservative affiliated people involved directly in seeking the profits from fracking), and i'm super glad one party leader has decided to speak out directly on the issues that are going to determine if our civilizations are going to be working as intended over the next century. ALL people are involved in AGW, there are no places to hide for the coming storm we are all creating. Our political systems (and the financial systems that run them) are slowly awaking to that fact, Hopefully it won't be before it is in reality 'too late'.