Your smug condescension is well noted, CMDR. Also, your partisan reconstituting of the facts. Yes, putting a timer on it isn't meant to imply doom at all lolol. Finally: I don't give a flying eff whether you don't take me seriously or not. I certainly don't take you seriously on much of anything, so fair is fair I suppose.That's exactly the sort of misrepresentation I was referring to.
The drafters of the New Green Deal do not think we are 'doomed' in the sense you imply. They think, with good reason, that we have maybe a dozen years to to act to limit global average temperature rise to 1.5C above pre-industrial levels and thus avoid some of the more negative impacts of climate change.
It's hard to take your arguments seriously if you cannot even attack an actual position. Stop watching media circuses, read the Green New Deal proposal, then argue against that.
Here's the text: https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/text
If you're attacking the first half, you're not going to get much traction, because you'd be wrong. Whole lot of holes in “Green New Deal mobilization” though...
@Gregg Rulz ok of course.