General / Off-Topic Recycle or Die! (the elite environmental thread)

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Do not forget that there is always bigger than you, my poor Jason.

View attachment 151672
That seems like a rather pedestrian way of analyzing auto safety, but even if we go with such a simplistic measuring stick the formula would go something like: if you're in a Suburban, a semi truck like the one pictured is going to be bigger than you and potentially more deadly in a contact situation, whilst if you're in a small compact everything is bigger and potentially more deadly. Still comes down to playing the odds and making yourself as safe as possible, while understanding that there are no guarantees.
 
The problem is we can't really afford to ignore them, as they are the ones that keep on voting in people like Trump or the Torries (and their messy involvement with fracking in the uk) in out political systems, and that causes the problems to just get worse for all of us.

So while it is frustrating, and often seemingly pointless, i think we need to help clarify the science in AGW, and how it is no different to the science that makes a plane fly or car drive etc. Science (when peer reviewed off course!) is what helps us tell facts from fallacies, and in the case of AGW, the vested interests of the Big Oil companies have been pulling the wool over peoples eyes for decades and we are just running out of time to stop a nasty future for our grand-children.

---------------

'Air pollution kills five people in Bristol each week, study shows':


Five people die each week in Bristol as a result of high levels of air pollution, a study has revealed.

Researchers at King’s College London examined the combined impact of PM2.5, which is mainly from domestic wood and coal burning and industrial combustion and nitrogen dioxide, which mainly comes from older polluting vehicles.

The fine particulates and nitrogen dioxide that pollute Bristol’s air cause about 260 people to die each year, the scientists calculated. These pollutants could cause up to 36,000 deaths across the UK each year, and also contribute to several health conditions including asthma, lung cancer, heart disease, stroke and diabetes.

Just another reason we should switch from ICE to EV personal vehicles, to clean up the dangerous air.
 
The problem is we can't really afford to ignore them, as they are the ones that keep on voting in people like Trump or the Torries (and their messy involvement with fracking in the uk) in out political systems, and that causes the problems to just get worse for all of us.
Weren't you complaining this thread kept getting locked for discussing politics?
 
Nice try ;)

------------------

Still ultimately this is what it is all about:

'Saudi Aramco valuation falls below $2tn target':


The value of Saudi Arabia’s state-owned oil giant has fallen below the $2tn target set by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman after a tepid response from international investors to its stock market flotation.

Saudi Aramco will sell up to 1.5% of the world’s most profitable company at between 30 riyal and 32 riyal a share (around 600-610p per share) through its market debut, it announced on Sunday. This would value the company at between $1.6tn and $1.7tn.

The listing on Riyadh’s Tadawul exchange is expected early next month and aims to raise between $24bn-$25.6bn (£30.1bn-£33bn) from investors in the Middle East to help reform the Saudi economy.

Aramco will reveal the final price of its shares, and its valuation, by early next month although has yet to announce a date when its shares will begin to trade.

The IPO was initially expected to be the largest market debut of any company, offering up to 5% of the company on both the Tadawul and an exchange in one of the world’s largest financial centres.

But after a series of delays to the listing, Aramco’s IPO will offer a far smaller stake, mainly to investors in the Middle East, and may fall short of the $25bn raised by Chinese online retailer Alibaba’s record debut in 2014.

Aramco has scrapped plans to market the float to US investors in favour of a careful focus on Middle Eastern institutional investors and ultra-high net worth individuals in the region where the company is confident of support.

Around 0.5% has been earmarked for Saudi retail investors, who have been promised tax cuts and a $75bn-a-year minimum dividend. Aramco is also courting investors in China and Russia to drum up investor support.

But in meetings held with other international banks and hedge funds Aramco has reportedly faced a cooler reception, amid scepticism over its $2tn valuation. A Bloomberg poll of international money managers found the majority put Aramco’s valuation at between $1.2tn and $1.5tn.

Where the vast wealth and power of Big Oil has been driving our economies and markets for decades and boosting the CO2 output alongside that. It is good to see the markets start to understand the danger they have put the whole foundations of human civilization in, and slowly start to adjust. Still it is a shame that options like this float are still possible, near total divestment from fossil fuel is the only way to ensure longterm human civilzation on this planet, as we have found out (and are finding out increasingly).
 
Again, nice try ;)

And you posted good stuff on the SUV/big car safety aspect Jason. This does really matter to many family people, and in the USA you have traditionally been into bigger cars in general vs what we do over here in 'europe'. I suspect much of that is due to the 'olde worlde' way many of our towns and villages have been laid out (before cars were a thing) and the in general more cramped geography (UK especially!). But yeah big safe cars are easy to sell to families concerned about collisions etc. That habit is hard to break, as we can see from SUV sales year over year, and globally not just in the USA.

--------------

Some 'upside' to the more extreme weather AGW is bringing us:

'Renewable energy: Rise in global wind speed to boost green power':


A new study suggests that global wind speeds have increased substantially since 2010 after decades of decline.

Scientists say they believe that changes in the patterns of ocean and atmospheric circulation are behind the rise.

The researchers say the discovery is very good news for the wind energy industry.

They believe that speedier winds will see the energy produced by a single turbine grow by about 37%.

Not so shabby boost that :)
 
Again, nice try ;)

And you posted good stuff on the SUV/big car safety aspect Jason. This does really matter to many family people, and in the USA you have traditionally been into bigger cars in general vs what we do over here in 'europe'. I suspect much of that is due to the 'olde worlde' way many of our towns and villages have been laid out (before cars were a thing) and the in general more cramped geography (UK especially!). But yeah big safe cars are easy to sell to families concerned about collisions etc. That habit is hard to break, as we can see from SUV sales year over year, and globally not just in the USA.

--------------

Some 'upside' to the more extreme weather AGW is bringing us:

'Renewable energy: Rise in global wind speed to boost green power':




Not so shabby boost that :)
Sure, you can sneer "nice try" because you're apparently sanctioned to flagrantly break not only your own thread rules, but the forum rules as well. Bottom line, Zak, is that this is just another example of the flaming hypocrisy that I've repeatedly pointed out from your side of the aisle.
 
That habit is hard to break, as we can see from SUV sales year over year, and globally not just in the USA.
It is necessary to tax even more heavily the owners of big cars and particularly the SUVs.

Hit them hard on the wallet.

With the purchase of the new and used vehicle, but also a differentiated tariff at the petrol pump and also an annual tax of big polluter.

Vehicle maintenance and repairs must be taxed more than for normal cars.

Same thing for insurance.

Owners of big cars and especially SUVs must be financially asphyxiated, to take away them the desire to rot the lives of others.

🧐
 
Last edited:
'Fossil fuel production on track for double the safe climate limit':


The world’s nations are on track to produce more than twice as much coal, oil and gas as can be burned in 2030 while restricting rise in the global temperature to 1.5C, analysis shows.

The report is the first to compare countries’ stated plans for fossil fuel extraction with the goals of the Paris climate agreement, which is to keep global heating well below 2C above pre-industrial levels, and to aim for 1.5C. It exposes a huge gap, with fossil fuel production in 2030 heading for 50% more than is consistent with 2C, and 120% more than that for 1.5C.

Scientists have warned that even the difference between 1.5C and 2C of heating will expose hundreds of millions of people to significantly higher risks of extreme heatwaves, drought, floods and poverty.

The report was produced by the UN Environment Programme and a coalition of research organisations. It complements an earlier UN analysis showing the current Paris agreement pledges to cut emissions would still lead to a catastrophic 3-4C rise.

This is dangerous stuff.
 
Sure, you guys "don't see the connection at all." Well, of course you don't, not when everyone who isn't ideologically aligned with you is an "aberration" as stated by Patrick a few quotes above, or how people who drive a different kind of vehicle that isn't woke skold approved "Owners of big cars and especially SUVs must be financially asphyxiated, to take away them the desire to rot the lives of others" again, a comment by Patrick (I lump most of you in the same category ideologically speaking, for the record, so his words and sentiment are shared by you as well). People who disagree should be financially "asphyxiated" because they're "rotting the lives of others." That's a powerful and hate filled sentiment right there, ladies and gentlemen.

See, that's the thing: when you get to the point where you look at people who disagree with you as sub human (common tactic of Messr Spiritwood) who are "rotting" the lives of others and you think they should be choked out, well, that's on a family friendly forum where you can say only so much and stay within the rules, it doesn't take a scientist to extrapolate from that point the road to fascism, totalitarian control and the ultimate liquidation of those who you feel are "aberrations" that you guys actually REALLY think but don't quite have the testicular fortitude to spell out in the public. Hence Demascus's comment in post #3006 that seems to be mystifying you so much.
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom