Right, so you admit you polarised heavily to one side of the argument and refuse to consider alternatives.
I think most of that comes from those that might be called AGW Deniers though? In fact that is 100% my experience as shown in this very thread (and the other) and any others one cares to look into.
The science (rational proven method) has been telling us for decades that AGW is real and we need to do something about it.
Those that deny AGW is real have very little evidence to back that opinion, but focus LOTS (all?) of their attention on 'conspiracy of world scientists' or straw-man using some science that ultimately is either taken out of context or is only partially true or does not stand up to the level of scientific scrutiny that the science telling us AGW is real has gone through.
Who behaves 'cultish' like? Those that follow a rational scientific deductive process that we built the modern world using, or those that have to resort to ludicrous conspiracies (i love a 'good' 'real' conspiracy myself, but the one AGW deniers employ are very thin and kind of embarrassing!) and insults ('woke', 'snowflake', etc) to fail to get others to agree with them?
I'd take a good hard look in the mirror and decide which describes your conduct the most here?
We have real actual proof that the big oil companies have been creating cover stories and fake news after their own (real) scientific research into AGW proved it was going to happen from using the product they relied on for their power and influence. It's one of the main reasons Exxon-Mobile are in court at this moment. This is 'real', (like the science behind AGW being real is real!) and the widely accepted version. Rationality is showing us that AGW is a real concern and we are creating these problems, and the sensible people are understanding this (in the face of the misinformation and fake-science) and slowly moving in the right direction despite the large concerted efforts of those in the Oil industry to slow all that process down.
This thread (and the other) are like 90% full of actual scientific information and about 10% full of the 'waste of time fantasy' stuff you like to 'contribute'. That is a good real world reflection on the AGW 'debate'. The debate has actually long been over (for the rational minds that don't want to create a terrible world for those that follow them), and now it is about carrying on the pressure (against the fake news and false conspiracies) to ensure those in governance actually do something before it is too late.
If the actual facts could say AGW was not real, that is where i'd be putting my hat. That is not the case so i can not support a 'theory' that can't even prove itself properly.
----------------------------------
Now some 'environmental' stuff as this thread covers the recycle stuff too:
'Sperm whale dies with 100kg 'litter ball' in its stomach':
Fishing nets and rope were among the debris found inside the whale which stranded on the Isle of Harris.
www.bbc.com
'Toxic chemical cocktail' passed to baby porpoises:
Potent chemicals are unwittingly passed down from mother to calf, according to a UK study.
www.bbc.com
So we have to keep fighting against all the non AGW mess we tend to make in our ultimately self-destructive modern life styles, plastics are a huge problem across the food chain and we will see the negative effects in our lives (if we are not already?). And the same for the toxic chemicals we drain into the sea's, we are mammals too and every child born today (from anywhere in the world) carries toxic contamination they would not have 100 years ago. Important things to think on.