I would like to reiterate, one last time. Coming from someone who actually has a degree in physics. From someone with a keen interest in interstellar drives. The Alcubierre Drive is. Made. Up.
Facts!! We don't need no stinkin' facts!
Seriously though, the thing generating the compression field is moving, yes?
Is it, then, moving though compressed space?
Y - then it too (ie. the ship) will be compressed, and moves no faster than normal.
N - then it is "normal" space, and moves no faster than normal.
The compression bubble is collapsing!!!
gilded with mathematical wankery.
But the wind from the ship travelling at near light speed would impact the planet, maybe melting it if not destroying it.
C'mon, Janaconda, you can do this! Keep up with me, c'mon! =P
Space is a fabric. That means it's like a towel, held on all ends by someone. If you grab the middle of the towel and pull it together, you're gonna have a small crumple of towel on your hands, yes? The moment you let go of that crumple, the force exerted by the people holding the towel will make it flat again, so it won't have a crumple. That is more or less precisely the way the universe fabric works in normal interactions, from movement to gravity.
Since that fabric stabilizes so ridiculously fast, there is no such thing as "moving into the space the drive compressed" -- that in itself is a break of causality, and therefore, in real space, impossible.
Your ship isn't moving, it creates a bubble that compresses/decompresses space. Which gives the impression of moving faster than the speed of light which as we know is impossible.
View attachment 8223
I would like to reiterate, one last time. Coming from someone who actually has a degree in physics. From someone with a keen interest in interstellar drives. The Alcubierre Drive is. Made. Up.
It has no basis in reality. It is idle speculation, gilded with mathematical wankery. It assumes the existence of forms of matter we have no reason to believe exist. It is literally equivalent to bigfoot and homeopathy. And the problem of simultaneity is just one of an infinite number of ways a faster-than-light drive would violate causality.
Discuss it all you want, but don't be fooled for even a moment that it is a "theory." Or even remotely respectable as an hypothesis.
If you want to look at the actual future of space propulsion, look up nuclear pulse drives, particularly ICF drives.
So I was hurling through space at an unimaginable speed, many times the speed of light. Strait into a water world I was scanning during my exploration. Emergency stop kicked in. Now my ship was orbiting a beautiful planet in high orbit with only 2% hull damage and not even whiplash. This got me thinking…
Time to get geeky… with maths!!
So let’s pick the lightest ship in the ED arsenal: Sidewinder.
Hull Mass: 25 tonnes (25000kg)
Get some real world numbers:
1 light second (unit of distance) = 299792.458 kilometres, so speed of light in vacuum (1C) = 299792458 m/s (conveniently converts to velocity really easily)… and let’s not get into any relativity or quantum voodoo (but if you want to get into relativity or quantum calculation please do below!).
So, one basic equation:
Kinetic energy = 1/2 mv^2
And now a simple calculation (punching an oversized Ti-84), let’s assume I was still traveling at around 5C because I forgot to slow down.
So my Kinetic Energy would be ½ * 25000 * (5*299792458)^2.
That is: 2.83E+22 Joules of energy or 2.83E+10 Terajoules (TJ).
Now I found this fun number on Wikipedia:
Total energy released from all nuclear testing on Earth (that we know of) since 1996 is: 2.135E+6 TJ
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_weapon_yield)
Just for comparison Hiroshima released somewhere between 54-75 TJ of energy.
So my little Sidewinder has to bleed off equivalent to 13260.32 times the amount of total energy released from all nuclear testing on Earth since 1996. In an instant.
That is enough energy to probably vaporise all water on the planet if my Ship didn’t stop in time (or destroy the planet just like the Death Star from StarWars). This is just a guess now. Someone please run the numbers. How much energy do you need to vaporise all water on earth? (I’m lazy).
Thinking about it some more, releasing that much energy in planets near orbit would probably not end well for the planet as well (especially earth). I wouldn't want that exploding over my head. And that is just a sidewinder moving slowly.
Also thinking about war in space…. No Station or massive flagship could withstand an impact from a sidewinder travelling on FSD engines. Imagine humble FSD missiles.
Anyhow. That is my geekout for the day. Enjoy!
We're not really compressing space here. The negative energy used destroys the space. But unlike fabric space can't have gaps, so all the space around the ex-space are pushed together making it appear like compression. But it's not.
The space will quickly be filled thanks to nearby energy but if we supply the energy readily we can choose were the fill goes. Notably we want it behind us.
We don't move into the space, we pick it up and put it behind us using energy manipulation.
That would be one hell of a sonic boom!But the wind from the ship travelling at near light speed would impact the planet, maybe melting it if not destroying it.