I just made it into the station with 4 seconds left o.o
So I've been doing the CG in 78 Ursae Majoris, and I had a really good RES instance spawning tons of good bounties. I stayed there for a long time no problem... then I found an Anaconda named Jebidiah Kerman.
Needless to say he outmaneuvered me and my canopy in now breached![]()
How much time did you spend writing that first post?I just made it into the station with 4 seconds left o.o
How much time did you spend writing that first post?![]()
I think the UA has been sold at Leonard Nimoy station. Couldn't make sense of the statement after your question beyond "maybe we'll" also why did you use "ban" as a key?iaf bnlpnr bcgvaymy fplq b un bt yfoabrq oizpy lft? nalce jf'ym gru a tblaft hqdnue bocr uhrz hnwe.
1, 26, 13
haha I wrote it on my way to the station in 78 Ursae (13,000ls)
Would have been a lot faster to jump to a different system with a close station. ;-)
There's something deeply disturbing about the idea of Witchspace without a canopy!
The answer is probably "we don't know" but I'll ask anyway.
If I'm in a system which is regularly giving me Hafnium-containing convoys, is it only a matter of time before a UA shows up, or do those ones appear everywhere regardless of whether the UA can be acquired there?
The answer is probably "we don't know" but I'll ask anyway.
If I'm in a system which is regularly giving me Hafnium-containing convoys, is it only a matter of time before a UA shows up, or do those ones appear everywhere regardless of whether the UA can be acquired there?
Since we got that name Lyran Betar again in the GalNet news...
Witchspace is indeed trippy especially without a canopy... I'm more puzzled about survivability without a canopy in a stellar corona... well that and the inevitable micrometeorite strikes...
Not a good prospect either way.
Since we got that name Lyran Betar again in the GalNet news...
I've been toggle-searching for all Systems starting with Beta...
All of them are contained roughly within 1000LY of SOL.
All except one oddball :
Beta Phoenicis
http://www.falconfly.de/temp/ELITE-BetaPhoenicis.jpg
Nevermind that it's positioned 10985LY below the Galactic plane...
Bug ?
Alternative labels for it (acc. to Astronomy Databases) are : HIP 5165 and HD 6595 - which after toggle-searching point to that exact same location
Interesting find. What is toggle-searching?