Viajero
Volunteer Moderator
Camural weighs in: "No boom but still no physics", better than nothing I guess:
Game Discussions Star Citizen Discussion Thread v12
- Thread starter Yaffle
- Start date
-
- Tags
- star citizen
00:13 the control panel moved as the platform begins to move. So, for some reason they modeled that control panel as a separate object? I wonder if it always move like that, but the camera always quickly look away for the rest of the video. It's one animation though, at least they could have divided into fold animation and raise/lower animation, almost as if they hadn't thought it through.
I still don't understand why they still don't have space forklift. A Forklift could have loaded cargo pallet directly into the cargo hold.
Too many things wrong about that ship, the rule of cool I guess.
Exiting the hangar is not for the faint hearted(the PTU seems excessively b0rked today)
Two animations for one door would need a rewrite of Star Doors tech, I guess?
I was wondering if any ship or part of has more than one animation? Even with IF statements it should be possible to choose between animations, unless its an engine limitation. Somthing like in Operation Flashpoint where objects couldn't travel faster than a certain speed or too many sounds playing at once.
The physics works though.
Ship elevators can stop at various decks or leave the ship. Doors and ramps only open or close. Maybe they could stop the animation in the middle?
I don't know enough about game development.
Death of a space fan?
Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/1jbaxai/death_tax_lets_get_this_fixed_first_im_going_to/
Top comments are some fun introspection, led by this...
Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/1jbaxai/death_tax_lets_get_this_fixed_first_im_going_to/
Top comments are some fun introspection, led by this...
Viajero
Volunteer Moderator
That is amazing in terms of what and how bad the thing is broken. He mentions something about an exploded ship under the surface, and because of that he can apparently go through the geometry. It is just...I don't think any translation is needed to say... this patch is a bit borked...
There seems to be landing gear everywhere. (And jank not far behind)
That is amazing in terms of what and how bad the thing is broken. He mentions something about an exploded ship under the surface, and because of that he can apparently go through the geometry. It is just...
Yeah I think what's going on is there's a large dead ship bisecting the surface, which has become invisible, aside from its landing gear. (So he can no-clip through that zone harmlessly).
I keep seeing floating landing gear in footage around the new sites. Something's iffy it seems...
EDIT:
Here's an example of how bad the performance seems to be.
His error there, but that's a helluva lotta lag...
Last edited:
Random aside:
I just learned that the universe may be inside a black hole...
www.space.com
(Or that the JWST may need calibrating)
I just learned that the universe may be inside a black hole...
Is our universe trapped inside a black hole? This James Webb Space Telescope discovery might blow your mind
"I think that the simplest explanation of the rotating universe is the universe was born in a rotating black hole."
(Or that the JWST may need calibrating
)
Quite surprised he's taking recent changes so badly. I think it might be the tooth extraction - though that is similar to playing SC
3 months into a year allegedly focused on stability, debug and QoL but actually see nothing more than shoehorned "content" that brings more bugs and inconvenience than anything else. It sure must not help.
But I'm not worried: CIG just have to bring some shinies and "potential" and faith will be restored, again.
Can't wait for 4.1.1.
But I'm not worried: CIG just have to bring some shinies and "potential" and faith will be restored, again.
Can't wait for 4.1.1.