No.I just scanned an ammonia world, then did a full 100% surface scan, then went to Betancourt and handed in my UC, got 400k for all data.
Relogged. 0 reports handed in. Progress 0.
Do these need to be previously unmapped planets?
No.I just scanned an ammonia world, then did a full 100% surface scan, then went to Betancourt and handed in my UC, got 400k for all data.
Relogged. 0 reports handed in. Progress 0.
Do these need to be previously unmapped planets?
I tried FSSing random unexplored systems earlier and got zilch. Also nothing for DSSing an entire system (that one had been explored). Seems it really is just AW this time, though leaves me puzzled where I got all my initial points from - as I hadn't been doing anything with AWIIRC, the last exploration CG we had counted as 1 report any system turned in under the form of UC data.
A jump and honk in a previously not-visited (not-explored) system would yield 1 report and fully fss-ing and mapping an entire system would yield the same 1 report.
An approach that favored economy route plotting for a quick jump and honk trip.
in that case there's a bug
I tried FSSing random unexplored systems earlier and got zilch. Also nothing for DSSing an entire system (that one had been explored). Seems it really is just AW this time, though leaves me puzzled where I got all my initial points from - as I hadn't been doing anything with AW![]()
I just scanned an ammonia world, then did a full 100% surface scan, then went to Betancourt and handed in my UC, got 400k for all data.
Relogged. 0 reports handed in. Progress 0.
Do these need to be previously unmapped planets?
Did it actually hand-in? I've been caught out by the 'only systems 20Ly away' limitation before. And 400k sounds low for an AW...I just scanned an ammonia world, then did a full 100% surface scan, then went to Betancourt and handed in my UC, got 400k for all data.
Relogged. 0 reports handed in. Progress 0.
Do these need to be previously unmapped planets?
Hmmmm Good point batman!!! I will double check in a bit...could be that I'm just being a towel!Did it actually hand-in? I've been caught out by the 'only systems 20Ly away' limitation before. And 400k sounds low for an AW...
Nah, I'm just late to the party (as usual)This isn't off to a great start it seems. 300 contributors, I got into top 10% with 49 reports, and the progress bar hasn't moved a single bit. Goalposts set a little high maybe ?
Have to ask, have signed up for the CG before handing over the data?in that case there's a bugas after logging I still show 0 reports.
So, the goal for Tier 5 is changed to 20 million.
That's still around 960k mapped ammonia worlds needed each day, with 10,000 participants each submitting 96 a day.
Still doesn't make much sense to me.
When you accept cookies on this site make sure you accept ALL cookies from the site for media and marketing...It's only my browser? - I cant seem to be seeing the YT clips any more, but i do see the link if i quote the post
Edit for example im seeing it in the qoted post, but the original post is blank
It's down to 2 million, not 20 million.
Are AWs distributed evenly or is there a pattern? The numbers of AWs varies wildly depending on the reference system in EDDB. Maybe indicates CMDR bias and thus indicates potential areas for undiscovered systems?What I did was to use https://eddb.io/body - set the filter for ammonia worlds, and DSS the already-discovered ammonia worlds in the Bubble. Did 30 or so today, will do some more tomorrow.
Thanks for the explanation. I'll continue declining unneccesary cookies. I don't think I'm missing out on anything important by not seeing YouTube links.When you accept cookies on this site make sure you accept ALL cookies from the site for media and marketing...
View attachment 198220
You may need to log out and back in to get the choice box..