Must be that not all AWs were mapped.
ie. 3 mapped + 1 not mapped = 10
It would have to be two, and I'm 90% sure I haven't missed two ammonias.
Must be that not all AWs were mapped.
ie. 3 mapped + 1 not mapped = 10
Sometimes I wonder if Frontier can actually do math.
The most participated CG of last week had 7,400 participants (rounded up from: https://inara.cz/galaxy-communitygoals/)
Let's do some math. The goal is 27,000,000 points. An Ammonia world is worth 1, mapped it's worth 3, so 9,000,000 mapped Ammonia worlds in total.
I'm gonna go with best case scenario here, and say that every player does an equal amount, and maps every single Ammonia world. I'm also going to be generous and say that there are going to be a total of 10,000 participants. That means every participant needs to map 900 Ammonia worlds. While definitely doable, especially with a tool such as https://spansh.co.uk/ammonia, I think it's absurd to think that all 10,000 players will do that much, when they only need top 75% for the rewarded module, and even more absurd to expect the top 10% - 25% to carry the excess.
So either Frontier cannot do math, or they do not want this goal completed. You decide I guess.
That link is only for already discovered aws I assume?
That is correct. Spansh can't report data it does not have.
I ran something up to help people find worlds to scan: https://spansh.co.uk/ammonia
We look forward to the results of your investigationHowever. The awarded points that previously have been posted here I guess is calculated from already discovered and mapped aw:s. Do we have any data if undiscovered ones yield more? Logically I think they should. After all, the faction in this cg wants information. It would be rather weird if they just would settle with thousands of commanders bringing in the exact information from worlds that there already is data on. New information should be worth more.
About how much time did you spend?
We look forward to the results of your investigation
I know at least 1 of the AW i handed in last night was saying it hadn't been mapped before, didn't notice any great increase in payout. I'm probably not paging through all my new AW just to hand them in to the CG - too much data![]()
But how do I turn this in - as Universal Cartography data? Does it need to be first mapped, or does remapping work as well?Road triiiip
(while dss-ing AW - not sure if FSS-in unexplored bodies helps - will test it if/when i will deliver my first batch of 50 dssed AWs)
UC, existing AW worlds work, Any world anyone has already been to works…But how do I turn this in - as Universal Cartography data? Does it need to be first mapped, or does remapping work as well?
As a native English speaker I can tell you: I don't know.ok im not native english so mabe you can help me cg means
a full engineered Detail Surface Scanner with twice the normal probe coverage
best g5 engenierd is plus 50%
does it mean you get a plus 100% for me it sounds like that?
But how do I turn this in - as Universal Cartography data? Does it need to be first mapped, or does remapping work as well?
Well... after a bit of consideration, don't think I'll be doing this one. I'm away for more than half of it... and cherry-picking ammonia worlds just feels like it'll make my eyeballs bleed, and I'll probably be out on the street if I don't help pack the car and buy supplies for the trip XD.
Though maybe next time, this sort of CG can be for something more common like Icy Worlds (Make Icy Worlds Great!)
Can you at least pls signup for the CG, so upper 75% have better chance of getting the module?Well... after a bit of consideration, don't think I'll be doing this one.