Are the map updates still happening? It's been a while since the last one (on the 11th June?)
So? If there are imprecisions or missing pictures, etc. one can always submit an update to fix that. Why would that not be the case?
Not sure what you think I'm talking about, but I mean that usually Corbin Moran - the person updating the maps with new entries - makes a post about what's been added to the database/map or rejected, and it's been a while since they did that. I'm guessing they're busy or something.
Yeah, they let new POI and update submissions accumulate for a bit and then they catch up with them. That's normal. If they were to stop accepting submissions I assume they would announce that fact.
Serebrov Crossing: shouldn't "Zero Meridian" be "Southern meridian"?
The Black Widow Pulsar: " the pulsar was estimated to move across the galactic plane at a speed of appr. one million miles per hour, which would be more than 20 times the speed of Sol " - I'm fairly certain mph isn't used anywhere in astronomy. I don't know what speeds are used for measuring star movements in the galaxy, but perhaps it would be best to change it to "at a speed of approximately twenty times that of Sol"?
Righto. I just asked because the four coordinate beacon POIs (Notus and all) refer to Northern / Southern / Western / Eastern Meridians. Makes more sense this way though.No. To my understanding 'zero meridian' or prime meridian is a longitude of zero defined by the location of Sol. There is no north or south in longitudes.
Yeah, but mph is an even more foreign measurement to most of the world than m/s (or km/s) would be. Which is why I suggested "at a speed of approximately twenty times that of Sol" instead, to offer an intuitive comparison (well, as much as the speeds of stars can be intuitive) and sidestep any issue of measurements.Measuring the movements of stars in miles per hour or kilometers per hour, when you want to put them into perspective, is not uncommon. You will also find "per second" quite often. As for the Black Widow, I got the speed from an educational podcast, which of course was aimed at the regular you-and-me viewer. Not everything has to be academized to death.![]()
I see you've updated the typos (thanks!), but left the screenshot credits out. Was this an accident, or intentional? I'm asking because if it's the latter, then I won't look more up later.
Don't forget that recently, the POI "Labirinto" at Traikaae CH-Y c10 had the screenshot author added, soon after post #2968 was posted.
I read my previous two posts again just to be sure, and I didn't suggest that anywhere. Even if you assumed I did, I didn't mean to - sorry, English isn't my first language. I know of course it would be a lot of work, and in the majority of cases, people submit screenshots of their own finds anyway. But since I was already looking at the Deep space outposts anyway, where all the screenshots were posted in response to the GMP requesting pictures and entries of the bases, I thought I'd save you the work and look up their authors as well.That was mostly intentional, because I'd like to have things standardised as much as possible and thus discuss it with the others. Maybe I have a language barrier here but do you really suggest we look up all submitted screenshots and fill in the author? Because we may have like 1,500 entries so far.