I fed my toad this afternoon. Five crickets went in, he pew-pewed four in no time (they were unshielded) but the fifth immediately burrowed under the water bowl, and Mr Toad doesn't even know he exists. Clever cricket 
They will find there are some who even after 200000 posts will still be willing to stand against them
I fed my toad this afternoon. Five crickets went in, he pew-pewed four in no time (they were unshielded) but the fifth immediately burrowed under the water bowl, and Mr Toad doesn't even know he exists. Clever cricket![]()
I could mention the free-switching of open/groups/solo mode, too - but that is basically the topic of this whole thread, so I won't.
Now, FD has a boring game on their hands,
Of course, the underlying aspect here (semantics withstanding) is "power and control". For those who think they're "running things"... my response would be- "You're not running anything but your mouth." I believe in balance in all things- which we currently have with different modes of play- even if "open" is more stacked to PvP, the fact that solo mode is completely exclusive tends to make up for this. Sure I'd prefer an open mode that completely excludes PvP aspects- but it's obvious that won't change anytime soon- nor will solo be removed for the sake of those who whine because they urinated in the punch bowl and everyone left the party. (or their "friends" did, in which they should be holding them accountable instead of blaming everyone else who left)
Live and let live, quit trying to "control" everything, and you'll soon realize that it all works out for everyone- of course for those who are power hungry it's never going to be enough. You could give them the entire game and they'll still want more.
Is it me or has the volume on this thread slowed down?
Seems like we hit 3000 faster in the other two threads....<shrug>
Perhaps the detractors are busy making more alt accounts to use, only been 101 one off posts so far.
So not quite enough to claim in this thread the entire player base wants forced PvP yet.
There was quite a few one of posts that restarted the debate in the prior 2 threads - the red links in my Sig will take you to the screen with the numbers.
...forced PvP...
Will never happen. And yes, you may sig-quote me on that. Not arrogance- that's how confident I am it will never happen, regardless of all the whine posts.
In fact, the whole argument reminds me of the spoiled rich kid's attitude in the movie "The Toy" when Richard Pryor finally walks out on the kid after he treats him like pond scum. What did he expect would happen?
I hope that they go to start replying, read, than realize that the argument they want to use has already been proven bumpkus.
It's the holiday season![]()
<scratches head>... if you dont want to interact with other players or only interact with certain players then use private or solo, dont ruin open for the people who do want the player interaction, it seems extremely selfish and unnecessary to do so
So where is the argument with this?
If you want to interact with players then you play open or private
If you want to interact with players and NPCs then you play open or private
If you want to interact with NPCs but still have other players around you play open or private
If you want to interact with NPCs but not other players you play solo
But the main thing is that open is about player interaction and if you dont want to interact with other players or only interact with certain players then use private or solo, dont ruin open for the people who do want the player interaction, it seems extremely selfish and unnecessary to do so
So where is the argument with this?
If you want to interact with players then you play open or private
If you want to interact with players and NPCs then you play open or private
If you want to interact with NPCs but still have other players around you play open or private
If you want to interact with NPCs but not other players you play solo
But the main thing is that open is about player interaction and if you dont want to interact with other players or only interact with certain players then use private or solo, dont ruin open for the people who do want the player interaction, it seems extremely selfish and unnecessary to do so
dont ruin open for the people who do want the player interaction, it seems extremely selfish and unnecessary to do so
Mouse, I admire your faith in humanity...![]()