That is a sucurrulous accusation! Even if there may be some truth behind it!
I only thought about Rob after making the merge.
I blame your new avatar. Most terrifying one ever.
- Status
I blame your new avatar. Most terrifying one ever.
Only response to that pun I can think of;
[video=youtube;dYUdoE4gtII]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dYUdoE4gtII[/video]
Bravo.
LOL
Yeah, it's Agonys fault this thread didn't fade away to the depths.
Agony, go sit in the corner and think about what you've done
Tut tut, I do hope Agony is not still on probation period
I was so looking forward to the support thread being needed
The core concept of the game's multiplayer is that each player is able to freely choose, on a session by session basis, who they will play with. So, what you are seeing as an issue is, in truth, a feature of the game. And a feature that was a strong selling point for players aplenty.
Also, the game's networking architecture was never made to force players together. Quite understandably so, given that never forcing players together is a core multiplayer concept of ED. As such, it's fairly easy to play in Open while preventing all contact with other players.
Last edited by a moderator:
Quote Originally Posted by Cody View Post
Cheat? <guffaws> You gotta do better than that, if you want to insult people!
Lol I don't normally post if the insult is below "cowardly" these days.
As thread MK3 crawls towards MK4, having read every single post, I think I have become a little desensitised.
Cheat? <guffaws> You gotta do better than that, if you want to insult people!
Lol I don't normally post if the insult is below "cowardly" these days.
As thread MK3 crawls towards MK4, having read every single post, I think I have become a little desensitised.
My Suggestion
What's about this?
What's about this?
You missed XB1. Also where will PS4 fit if they get it? and Linux?
You also missed the part where FD said "No"
Last edited:
Also missed $$$$$$$$$ for bgs2. Unless Amazon are doing a rent 1 AWS and get 1 free promotion.
Why? Why are some PVPers so important that they want Frontier to expend so much to make a BGS just for them? People complain about the community being fractured, yet they want to have their own special little bubble that they and only they can influence.
We are all part of the community and all influence the BGS.. if that bothers you then may I suggest you request to be shadowbanned so you can play to your hearts content and don't have to worry about the BGS at all.
And I missed the reason, why "The Solo vs Open vs Groups Thread" is so long...
Because some feel they have entitlement and keep having to be told they are just like everyone else?
Why is it so important for PVE- or Solo-Players to influence the bubble of the Open-Only-Players?
Oh that is easy, some folks either didn't read up on what they were buying - or think they are so important they can dismiss the entire 10 year plan and force themselves on everyone else.
All people, on all platforms, impact the 1 BGS as 1 community.
This was stated 3 years ago and the information has been available since then.
Because that is what the game designers want. No one is going to change their minds...no matter how persuasive their thoughts are.
This game is built on the idea that everyone influences everyone else...that is the equality through the modes. Whether you are PC, XBone, or Mac...everyone has the same inputs and effects!
Really, they have never changed their mind?
They don't, because there is NO open only bubble.. We are all part of ONE Background Simulation. While some don't want to participate in PVP they are still part of the same community..
Not on the BGS complaints from the PvP crowd.
What's the disadvantage of this concept?
No disadvantage.
- Status