Heh, arguments are lke buses. You wait ages fir one the two come along at once!![]()
Or if you don't agree with the majority opinion in this thread, 7.
Heh, arguments are lke buses. You wait ages fir one the two come along at once!![]()
Or if you don't agree with the majority opinion in this thread, 7.
I'm not requiring anyone to do anything.
I'm not requiring anyone to do anything.
... masquerading as facts....
I'm going to play half-drunk in a minute. That's risky.
I demand my 10%! I pay my taxes, why can't I have my 10%?!
Are you going to play in Open? If you smash into someone in a letterbox you should be liable for both insurances.![]()
I'm going to play half-drunk in a minute. That's risky.
I demand my 10%! I pay my taxes, why can't I have my 10%?!
Then why try to encourage players into Open? Also, you (among others) have stated that you want Frontier to change the game by increasing the average potential earning rate in Open to mitigate the perceived lower risks encountered by players in Solo - that's at least requesting that someone does something.
Here is a fact for you;
The ONLY difference in earning potential between the modes - is OTHER players getting in YOUR way or not.
And who has the power over that?
Oh right, each and every single one of us.
I don't let others get in my way, you apparently do.
That is not MY fault, that does not qualify YOU for extra benefits.
![]()
Which just happens to have the unfortunate side effect of increasing your income.
That's fairy nuff.
Fair point. The game needs a breathalyser to determine the bonus.
Requesting =/= Requiring, and Encouraging =/= Requiring either. I'm not requiring anyone to do anything they don't want. I'm trying to encourage people to play open, and requesting FD makes a change to facilitate that.
Requesting =/= Requiring, and Encouraging =/= Requiring either. I'm not requiring anyone to do anything they don't want. I'm trying to encourage people to play open, and requesting FD makes a change to facilitate that.
Ok this argument is going in circles and I'm getting dizzy.
Don't drink and fly!
Rationalization in action. You want the game altered in such a way so that more people play the way you want them to play rather than the way they want to play.
Except I don't view it that way, I already believe that solo is encouraged over open, im merely trying to tip the balance back to normal.
Except I don't view it that way, I already believe that solo is encouraged over open, im merely trying to tip the balance back to normal.
True. Very true. Excellent point. Do you not think many people share that sentiment?
Do you then also not agree that the reward for playing open should not be measured in credits but units of fun? And that this argument also goes the other way. The reward for playing solo should be measured in fun? And that arguing to have a 10% increase in revenue is missing the point as severely as I am missing that letterbox over there?
I now refuse to play in open, Pirating will kill the open version of Elite if the "death tax is not changed" It is far to steep for the casual player right now and believe it or not the casual player is whom will keep this game alive for many years.
A better "tax" would be to drop the player to the base model of current ship and 10% of accumulated wealth removed.
What this would encourage is more people to venture into the open world and try out the PvP system.