Hey, what about renting ships?
Was supposed to be in 3.6 but got bumped to 3.6.1. So hypothetically, some time before Oct 1st assuming 3.6.1 is before 3.7. But 3.6 is now 19 days late. So something has got to give sooner or later.
Hey, what about renting ships?
Wasn't Teach's Ship Rental Shop in Levsky the first of several places added in the PU for that? Or was it a one-shot time limited feature, quickly swept under the carpet once they discovered it harms funding?
What is the usual in game auec and time required per average mission?
From all that I have seen in Star Citizen, it plays like a movie, feels like scripted scenes written for someone else and all that is missing is Chris Roberts as Star Citizen.
assuming 3.6.1 is before 3.7
Was supposed to be in 3.6 but got bumped to 3.6.1. So hypothetically, some time before Oct 1st assuming 3.6.1 is before 3.7. But 3.6 is now 19 days late. So something has got to give sooner or later.
I think the pendulum is shifting slowly. The only reason to gently bring the in game prices down is because you need to attract new players. Backers have been more than generous, the moment they aren't funding to the same level, you need new money..The school of whales is exhausted, so you are into regular gamers and the last thing you want is a grind wall so high that it puts people off. This was inevitable and part of the reason why the T&C's have changed. I see lots of wailing of a different sort looming.Cant they see the inherent contradiction here ? If it's not pay 2 win then why complain about getting a Hammerhead in 2 weeks of grinding ? It should not be an issue, right if it's "not p2w" as they claim ?
Cant they see the inherent contradiction here ? If it's not pay 2 win then why complain about getting a Hammerhead in 2 weeks of grinding ? It should not be an issue, right if it's "not p2w" as they claim ?
They're just heating up the branding irons — heretical thought must be purged by fire.It has been a couple hours and no one has responded to my similar question.
I've seen reports that with QT interdictions and scans happening frequently (2 - 3 times per run) and no way to avoid them (you can't avoid an interdiction and running away = you get crime status instantly) the drug running is pmuch dead, but we'll have to see.And if they bring back drug running / illegal missions being really profitable, it could make money making easier.
In conclusion, I don't think Chris Roberts wants to release this game and is hoping deparetly that someone from Hollywood will take note and hire him to turn it into a movie, with him as star film director and film maker.
From all that I have seen in Star Citizen, it plays like a movie, feels like scripted scenes written for someone else and all that is missing is Chris Roberts as Star Citizen.
It means to take a back-hander, i.e. take money that you should not be taking, usually as a bribe.thx, you just never stop learning.
I don't think that's true, from the very limited amount I know about SC, I think they just bit off way more than they could chew. I mean they're trying to do ED AND space legs, which is a tall order for anyone to deliver!It is if you have no intention of finishing both games.
People are odd tho....!Even when Charles Ponzi was in jail, people kept sending him their money to invest when he got out. They don't want to appear to have failed. Very strange behaviour.
I've seen reports that with QT interdictions and scans happening frequently (2 - 3 times per run) and no way to avoid them (you can't avoid an interdiction and running away = you get crime status instantly) the drug running is pmuch dead, but we'll have to see.
Maybe CI can balance it (wwwwww)