The Star Citizen Thread V10
- Thread starter Sir.Tj
- Start date
- Status
Most open development ever!
Devs in charge of missions explain why it's not their fault necessarily.
A rare "It's Alpha?!" direct from a developer?!
Source: https://youtu.be/MuPh3eg276Q?t=892
A rare "It's Alpha?!" direct from a developer?!
"It's not our fault - the rest of the game is broken" - lol. Somewhat worrying that they're as confused as us about why boxes would drop through floors
"It's not our fault - the rest of the game is broken" - lol. Somewhat worrying that they're as confused as us about why boxes would drop through floors
Perhaps Genuine Roberts has just approved the development pipeline for 4th dimension game mechanics - and we are simply incapable of observing on a 2d screen?
Well, they are supposedly changing their entire UI programming from scratch so they could very well be moving away from Scaleform since they claim the flash format used in the early UI is clunky - moving their programming from everything strictly CryTek sounds about right.
It is as a consequence but yeah the game being broken is just the result. Oh and its "early days"...what the hell is wrong with you haters? Why does nobody have any patience anymore in this world?
Thats exactly the point : they have to get rid of Scaleform, because it's not fit for the job, and probably mainly because it's a proof they've not switched totally to Lumberyard as Scaleform is not provided with Amazon 's engine
I really do not see however how one could make the argument that they have not switched fully to Lumberyard simply because Scaleform was not provided with the engine - if the same tool works for Cryengine it works for Lumberyard so it would in that case be a case of tweaking the code to work with Lumberyard.
I mean, scaleform is a separate tool that works with multiple types of engines and not something that Crytek can really hang their argument on.
I heard the code whisperer adding scaleform to lumberyard one night, while sleeping.
"I can flick switches in my sleep"
True, true. After all it's only the first decade of development. "Early days" like they say.
"lol yeah so what people need to understand is that a mission seems simple, pick up a box, drop off a box, but people have to understand that inbetween those simple points is THE GAME, THE WHOLE GAME"
Jeff Goldblum voice:
That there sounds like some kind of cause/effect shorthand..eh..eh..it should be simple..eh..but it isn't..eh...because of all the stuff "inbetween"..all those layers and layers of complexity every time they want to do something simple eh? WHY?
Last edited:
Chris...finds a way?....
According to a very strongly worded rage post (which I cannot link because of it) from one of the more fervent believers (you guys here are all so weak-sauce ) Star Citizen utilizes a polynomial quantum drive calculator attuned for each drive system which CIG had to invent and build first. First time I m hearing about something like this.
Apart from the individual words I have absolutely no idea what the combination of them mean. Can any SC-pro explain the idea or just say its a pocket calculator?
) Star Citizen utilizes a polynomial quantum drive calculator attuned for each drive system which CIG had to invent and build first. First time I m hearing about something like this.Apart from the individual words I have absolutely no idea what the combination of them mean. Can any SC-pro explain the idea or just say its a pocket calculator?
Fluid mechanics can be quite complex and so with stuff in the pipeline it is mandatory to know where it's going and that.According to a very strongly worded rage post (which I cannot link because of it) from one of the more fervent believers (you guys here are all so weak-sauce
Apart from the individual words I have absolutely no idea what the combination of them mean. Can any SC-pro explain the idea or just say its a pocket calculator?
- Status