These records lasted long time but not any longer: Largest body (non-gas giant) and Largest ringed body (non-gas giant) - Synuefe VE-R C20-4 AB 5 with radius at 25,210 km
However, what about the Pandora Box?
Sorry again, but your methodology to measure distances between black holes and stars is also entirely wrong as you have to be in line with both of them - you could see it on my pictures from Keling here. But before coming to any conclusions with HD 35395 you should check HIP 63835, first.
Edit:

Check here - 8 candidates for Agri worlds and 19 at least high metal content planets (i.e. over 32% metal).I don't think were doing those at the time? what is the post number?
However, what about the Pandora Box?
I don't like to repeat myself but you do not have to look far and it's enough to just check Enceladus.so bringing this back... should it go on record or you found the 0.0 earth masses one?
Sorry but spinning is something entirely different than orbital period.I would also like to propose the fastest spinning black hole at an orbital period of 9.5 days : HD 35395 B
[img=http://s22.postimg.org/msh1zqk25/Screenshot_0094.jpg]
And the slowest spinning black hole at an orbital period of 111,448.9 days : LAM01 Orionis B
[img=http://s22.postimg.org/9k4ckxzbh/Screenshot_0091.jpg]
Finally, I dunno if it's ok but I'd like to propose the fastest spinning blue-white/star (HD 35395 A) at an orbital period of 9.5 days (I can't record video but this blue sun is spinning really fast, faster one that I've seen. Since it has the same spinning speed as the black hole very close to it I guess they are affecting each other... probably the whole will swallow the star in the future)
[img=http://s16.postimg.org/vwll4vy9d/Screenshot_0096.jpg]
finally, how about a new entry: the closest black hole to any sun at 113Ls? (can anyone confirm it seems rare enough - it's very much the closest I've seen on my side)
[img=http://s3.postimg.org/rc35il6sv/Screenshot_0097.jpg] (on this screen I'm 3 Ls from the sun so it's more 110Ls but let's just say 113Ls)
Sorry again, but your methodology to measure distances between black holes and stars is also entirely wrong as you have to be in line with both of them - you could see it on my pictures from Keling here. But before coming to any conclusions with HD 35395 you should check HIP 63835, first.
Edit:
He is probably just suggesting to jump into it because on close inspection it could be different - I've already seen an example when on the map a system had seemed to have 2 black holes but on close inspection one of them has turned out to be an O dwarfHow do you know it's not scanned ?
Last edited: