Universal Cartographics Galactic Record Breakers

John Xenir · Jan 28, 2015

Patau82 said:
that's the old list click on the picture of the book!

Me so sorry

Will do, thank you

Patau82 · Jan 28, 2015

John Xenir said:
Me so sorry Will do, thank you

lol no problems enjoy

CMDR Gerakis · Jan 29, 2015

HOTTEST EARTH LIKE IS SWOILZ ZQ-C D78 3 WITH A SURF TEMP OF 311K
&
EARTH LIKE WITH THE HIGHEST SURFACE PRESSURE WITH 3.62 ATM

[img=http://s2.postimg.org/u5c55a9hx/Screenshot_0008.jpg]

HOTTEST ROCKY ICE PLANET IS COL 285 SECTOR QU-D B26-5 5 WITH A SURF TEMP OF 2,925K
&
ROCKY ICE PLANET WITH THE HIGHEST SURFACE PRESSURE WITH 992,896.19 ATM

[img=http://s14.postimg.org/465arvzr1/Screenshot_0009.jpg]

CMDR Gerakis · Jan 29, 2015

SYSTEM WITH THE MOST CLASS IV GAS GIANTS
HR 7706 WITH 3 IV GAS GIANTS

[img=http://s30.postimg.org/526dl543l/Screenshot_0010.png]

[img=http://s30.postimg.org/y20s14mpt/Screenshot_0011.png]

[img=http://s30.postimg.org/kz55huwht/Screenshot_0012.png]

CMDR Gerakis · Jan 29, 2015

COLDEST RINGED STELLAR BODY IS HIP 97710 3 WITH A SURF TEMP OF 256.00K

[img=http://s11.postimg.org/fqtf05ten/Screenshot_0013.jpg]

HIGH METAL CONTENT PLANET WITH THE LOWEST SURFACE PRESSURE
BETA CORONAE AUSTRINAE 1 WITH 2.41 ATM

[img=http://s23.postimg.org/7d8gwncpz/Screenshot_0015.jpg]

Virgil Kyle · Jan 29, 2015

Patau82 said:
yep I will sort it out this weekend

Wow. So used to being fought tooth-and-nail any time I have something contrarian to say on this forum, I totally didn't expect that, lol

Thanks for seeing my point!

Lord_Zapan · Jan 29, 2015

CMDR Gerakis said:
HIGH METAL CONTENT PLANET WITH THE LOWEST SURFACE PRESSURE
BETA CORONAE AUSTRINAE 1 WITH 2.41 ATM

I have seen lots of HMC planets with 0.00 pressure

R3tCrick3t · Jan 29, 2015

crab pulsar is actually a pulsar (really fast rotating neutron star) FYI

Jack Luminous · Jan 29, 2015

Water world with the lowest surface pressure
tr 24 sector ne-f c12-10 3 with 0.15 atmospheres

[EDIT] switching to "go advanced" after typing the above text turned capital letters into small ones...and editing won't help. Sorry!

R3tCrick3t · Jan 29, 2015

Virgil Kyle said:
Wow. So used to being fought tooth-and-nail any time I have something contrarian to say on this forum, I totally didn't expect that, lol Thanks for seeing my point!

We can offcourse always fight you with tooth and nail if you prefer this ;-)

All latest records added

Niddi · Jan 29, 2015

Jack Luminous said:
Water world with the lowest surface pressure
tr 24 sector ne-f c12-10 3 with 0.15 atmospheres

Now I'm confused. I thought that planets like this one are supposed to go to the "Terraformable" section? Patau mentioned it just the other day.

Patau82 said:
sorry as that planet is terraformable it goes in the terraformable section not the water world section, this will be changed when I get a chance this weekend I'm hoping to add a section for each type of terraformable planet

Krunchie · Jan 29, 2015

There is no record for this category, but I stumbled upon a water world with the atmosphere consisting 82% of oxygen. Seemed unusually high to me.

Grazbaat · Jan 29, 2015

So, I guess you'll be adding the C-N star category since we got it sorted out.

Here are the records:

Oldest, smallest, lightest and coldest C-N star, as well as C-N star with most bodies: EOS SCRAA DP-R D4-149 A with 13'616 My, 29.3480 Ro, 0.9492 Mo and 2'770 K and 8 bodies

Heaviest and largest C-N star: FOERDY IB-F D11-834 with 0.9727 Mo and 29.6527 Ro

Hottest and youngest C-N star: FOERDY KM-D D12-33 A with 2'831 K and 12'733 My

Jack Luminous · Jan 29, 2015

Niddi said:
Now I'm confused. I thought that planets like this one are supposed to go to the "Terraformable" section? Patau mentioned it just the other day.

Aha, I missed that message...Hmm...maybe these categories could coexist? I mean, I was under the impression that we could have both terraformable and non-terraformable planets within a given planet category (for example water worlds) - a water world is a water world regardless of its other qualities. Having separate categories (perhaps in a book section of their own?) for all types of terraformable planets would not conflict with this and it would make an interesting comparison between terraformable and non-terraformable planets. Of course some terraformable planets might end up on both the general records page and the terraformables page, but I don't see how that would be a problem.

Patau82 · Jan 29, 2015

Jack Luminous said:
Aha, I missed that message...Hmm...maybe these categories could coexist? I mean, I was under the impression that we could have both terraformable and non-terraformable planets within a given planet category (for example water worlds) - a water world is a water world regardless of its other qualities. Having separate categories (preferably in a section of their own) for all types of terraformable planets would not conflict with this...or am I mistaken?

I've been trying to keep terraformable separate from non terraformable, don't ask me why I now its a bit stupid
I think its still worth separating terraformable from non terraformable but keeping them in the same planet category
I'm hoping to make changes this weekend, I will change that record you posted

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -

Grazbaat said:
So, I guess you'll be adding the C-N star category since we got it sorted out.

Here are the records:

Oldest, smallest, lightest and coldest C-N star, as well as C-N star with most bodies: EOS SCRAA DP-R D4-149 A with 13'616 My, 29.3480 Ro, 0.9492 Mo and 2'770 K and 8 bodies

View attachment 11394

Heaviest and largest C-N star: FOERDY IB-F D11-834 with 0.9727 Mo and 29.6527 Ro

View attachment 11396

Hottest and youngest C-N star: FOERDY KM-D D12-33 A with 2'831 K and 12'733 My

View attachment 11395

will add new pages for C-N's when I get back from work this evening

Jack Luminous · Jan 29, 2015

Patau82 said:
I've been trying to keep terraformable separate from non terraformable, don't ask me why I now its a bit stupid
I think its still worth separating terraformable from non terraformable but keeping them in the same planet category

I don't think that's stupid at all

Having terraformables and non-tfs in the same planet category would also be handy for comparing them. Thanks for the hard work, looking forward to yet another subcategory

Ferris · Jan 29, 2015

COLDEST Y-TYPE STAR
HIP 97581 AB 6 WITH A SURFACE TEMPERATURE OF 252K - FERRIS

Also in a tie for lightest..

The above is also...
COLDEST STELLAR BODY
HIP 97581 AB 6 WITH A SURFACE TEMPERATURE OF 252K - FERRIS

Great thread BTW.

Edit - In the Y-TYPE STARS section of the book it reads 'SYSTEM WITH THE MOST T-TYPE STARS' on page 54.
Looks like there is no current record for..

SYSTEM WITH THE MOST Y-TYPE STARS
HIP 97581 WITH 4 Y-TYPE STARS - FERRIS

gumbie · Jan 29, 2015

SMALLEST A-TYPE STAR
OUTORST DW-E D11-17 A WITH A SOLAR RADIUS OF 1.2087 CMDR NATALIE PORTMAN

SMALLEST M-TYPE STAR
OUTORST OY-L B49-0 B WITH A SOLAR RADIUS OF 0.3089 CMDR NATALIE PORTMAN

LIGHTEST M-TYPE STAR
OUTORST ZS-M B48-0 B WITH 0.1680 SOLAR MASSES CMDR NATALIE PORTMAN

LARGEST L-TYPE STAR
OUTORST YR-E B53-1 B WITH A SOLAR RADIUS OF 0.3809 CMDR NATALIE PORTMAN

LARGEST T-TYPE STAR
OUTORST CY-U B44-0 B WITH A SOLAR RADIUS OF 0.2571 CMDR NATALIE PORTMAN

YOUNGEST T-TYPE STAR
OUTORST ZS-M B48-0 C AT 258 MILLION YEARS CMDR NATALIE PORTMAN

HOTTEST CLASS IV GAS GIANT
HD 3123 1 WITH A TEMPERATURE OF 1,194 K CMDR NATALIE PORTMAN

HOTTEST CLASS III GAS GIANT
OUTORST TE-F C25-3 3 WITH A TEMPERATURE OF 747 K CMDR NATALIE PORTMAN

LIGHTEST GAS GIANT WITH WATER-BASED LIFE
OUTORST TE-F C25-1 A 2 WITH 3.6064 SOLAR MASSES CMDR NATALIE PORTMAN

Patau82 · Jan 29, 2015

Added latest records!

also if you guys view the book whilst logged on with a google account you use the chat function, makes a useful chat room.
I'm off to work now so you wont see me there until tonight

Niddi · Jan 29, 2015

gumbie said:
SMALLEST A-TYPE STAR
OUTORST DW-E D11-17 A WITH A SOLAR RADIUS OF 1.2087 CMDR NATALIE PORTMAN

SMALLEST M-TYPE STAR
OUTORST OY-L B49-0 B WITH A SOLAR RADIUS OF 0.3089 CMDR NATALIE PORTMAN

There are two small errors (they're both still records though). The first one is 1.2097, not 1.2087. And the second one is 0.3098 and not 0.3089. The numbers in the book also have to be corrected.