Universal Cartographics Galactic Record Breakers

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.

Ambivalent

A
No new records here, but something i never saw before , so thought i'd share it. Alot of big moons!

cool system.png
 

Jack Luminous

Jack Luminous
Cmdr Trav ElEr said:
A system scanner has always been enough. though previously it didn't give you all the detailed info I thought. But migth be mistaken about that. But scans pay a lot less I think. Was it half the payout?
Click to expand...

Ah. I always thought the scanner was only for scanning ships and other smaller objects. In any case, if the pay is less without a DSS, currently you get the same amount of information about a planet but a different amount of credits depending on which scanner you use :) Of course this will (hopefully) be fixed when the mysterious Level 2 and Level 3 scans become a reality...
 
Last edited:

Ambivalent

A
New records for CN type star.

LARGEST CN TYPE STAR
PHRAA FLYUAE EW-E D11-5405 WITH A SOLAR RADIUS OF 29.7531

HEAVIEST CN TYPE STAR
PHRAA FLYUAE EW-E D11-5405 WITH 0.9805 SOLAR MASSES

HOTTEST CN TYPE STAR
PHRAA FLYUAE EW-E D11-5405 WITH A TEMPERATURE OF 2,836.00k

YOUNGEST CN TYPE STAR
PHRAA FLYUAE EW-E D11-5405 AT 12,489 MILLION YEARS

CLOSEST CN TYPE STAR TO SAGITTARIUS A*
PHRAA FLYUAE EW-E D11-5405 AT 2,895.06 LYS

CMDR Ambivalent

Screenshot_0016 (2).jpg
Screenshot_0017 (2).jpg
 

Patau82

Patau82
added latest records!:D
also here's a community goal you guys might be interested in:
T31MIAF.jpg
looks like were getting 8 new outposts!
if you want to contribute head to Nourse Orbital in Lambda Andromedae.
Its already at the 6th tier on its first day!:D I wonder if they build more at higher tiers?
notice the number of contributors and the number of reports submitted! someone's been waiting for this ;)

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -

Ambivalent said:
No new records here, but something i never saw before , so thought i'd share it. Alot of big moons!

View attachment 16787
Click to expand...

very nice! are any of those moons terraformable?

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -

Jack Luminous said:
Ah. I always thought the scanner was only for scanning ships and other smaller objects. In any case, if the pay is less without a DSS, currently you get the same amount of information about a planet but a different amount of credits depending on which scanner you use :) Of course this will (hopefully) be fixed when the mysterious Level 2 and Level 3 scans become a reality...
Click to expand...
I'm pretty certain you used to get less info when scanning without a DSS, I think you only used to get the name but no extra info
 

Ambivalent

A
Naww sadly non on those moons were CTF's, they were all very close together less than 200 ls between the gas giants, so it was either all or nothing, unfortunately they were just a little bit too hot, but it was almost there! I never saw a system like that before though, all those moons were between 1 and 2.5 earth masses.
 

Starlanced

Starlanced
OLDEST F-TYPE STAR
TYC 5126-4042-1 A at 11,188 Million Years - CMDR Starlancer

COLDEST F-TYPE STAR
TYC 5126-4042-1 A at 4,515.00 K - CMDR Starlancer

Screenshot_0010.jpg
 
Last edited:

carazvan

C
2 new records for O-type stars:

HEAVIEST O-TYPE STAR
HIP 90600 A WITH 119.3633 SOLAR MASSES - CMDR NAVZARTON

HOTTEST O-TYPE STAR
HIP 90600 A WITH A TEMPERATURE OF 115,905.00K - CMDR NAVZARTON

pRhe2Lb.png

I see Ender has taken back some records in terraformable rocky planets ... time to search for some more of those then and reclaim the category ;)
 

Jack Luminous

Jack Luminous
Hmm...that community goal seems very interesting, nice to see us exploring folks get some attention! The mission description could use some debugging though :D

A comment on Y-class stars - I've seen many, many examples of these with a solar mass of 0.0078. Do you think we've hit the lowest value here?
 
Last edited:

Kalpa

Kalpa
Jack Luminous said:
A comment on Y-class stars - I've seen many, many examples of these with a solar mass of 0.0078. Do you think we've hit the lowest value here?
Click to expand...

Quite likely yes.


Also, uhm... how are we dealing with Source 2, the star orbiting Sagittarius A* ? As it is on highly eccentric orbit its distance to Sagittarius A* varies quite a lot. Do we just disqualify it straight away or what? Or mark it as 'the closest to Sag A* with distance of 0.0LY' or..?

As I'm here now, and I plan to start recording quite a bit of 'closest to Sagittarius A*' records for the book.
 

Kalpa

Kalpa
Okay let's start off traditionally...

IMAGE LINK 1 (PROOF THAT STUEMEAE KM-W C1-8086 SYSTEM IS 0.91LY FROM SAGITTARIUS A*)

IMAGE LINK 2
CLOSEST K-TYPE STAR TO SAGITTARIUS A*
STUEMEAE KM-W C1-8086 A AT 0.91 LY

IMAGE LINK 3
CLOSEST M-TYPE STAR TO SAGITTARIUS A*
STUEMEAE KM-W C1-8086 B AT 0.91 LY

IMAGE LINK 4
CLOSEST TERRAFORMABLE HIGH METAL CONTENT PLANET TO SAGITTARIUS A*
STUEMEAE KM-W C1-8086 B 8 AT 0.91 LY

(in my opinion, the terraformable should also count for any parent planet category, in this case CLOSEST HIGH METAL CONTENT PLANET TO SAGITTARIUS A*, but if the jury disagrees...

IMAGE LINK 5
CLOSEST HIGH METAL CONTENT PLANET TO SAGITTARIUS A*
STUEMAEA KM-W C1-8086 B 7 AT 0.91LY

or in fact any other of the 1 through 7, they are all high metal content planets - I just like to count them from outward, as things in farther out orbits will most likely (but not always) be closer to sagittarius A* at some point in time than others)


...now, as you might imagine this will get a bit tiresome pretty quickly. Could we accept navigation computer listings, like THESE THREE SCREENSHOTS (with more to come as I work my way outwards) as a proof for distance to Sagi A*, instead of me having to paste a separate galaxy map screenshot for every entry in these systems very close to Sag A*?

Also I feel kinda bad for taking credit for any/all of these, considering most of the systems have been visited before and there are first discovery credits just everywhere...
 
Last edited:

Kalpa

Kalpa
IMAGE LINK (PROOF OF STUEMEAE KM-W C1-342 DISTANCE FROM SAGI A* = 1.38LY)

IMAGE LINK 2
CLOSEST GAS GIANT WITH WATER-BASED LIFE TO SAGITTARIUS A*
STUEMEAE KM-W C1-342 1 AT 1.38 LY

IMAGE LINK 3
CLOSEST ICY PLANET CLOSEST TO SAGITTARIUS A*
STUEMEAE KM-W C1-342 2 F AT 1.38 LY

IMAGE LINK 4
CLOSEST CLASS I GAS GIANT TO SAGITTARIUS A*
STUEMEAE KM-W C1-342 2 AT 1.38 LY
 

Kalpa

Kalpa
IMAGE LINK (PROOF STUEMEAE KM-W C1-2806 SYSTEM DISTANCE FROM SAGITTARIUS A* = 1.55 LY)

IMAGE LINK 2
CLOSEST AMMONIA WORLD TO SAGITTARIUS A*
STUEMEAE KM-W C1-2806 A 3 AT 1.55 LY

IMAGE LINK 3
CLOSEST L-TYPE STAR TO SAGITTARIUS A*
STUEMEAE KM-W C1-2806 B AT 1.55 LY

IMAGE LINK 4
CLOSEST T-TYPE STAR TO SAGITTARIUS A*
STUEMEAE KM-W C1-2806 C AT 1.55 LY
 

Kalpa

Kalpa
IMAGE LINK (PROOF STUEMEAE FG-Y D8248 DISTANCE FROM SAGITTARIUS A* = 1.93 LY)

IMAGE LINK 2
CLOSEST F-TYPE STAR TO SAGITTARIUS A*
STUEMEAE FG-Y D8248 AT 1.93 LY

IMAGE LINK 3
CLOSEST METAL RICH PLANET TO SAGITTARIUS A*
STUEMEAE FG-Y D8248 1 AT 1.93 LY

IMAGE LINK 4
CLOSEST Y-TYPE STAR TO SAGITTARIUS A*
STUEMEAE FG-Y D8248 15 AT 1.93 LY

IMAGE LINK 5
CLOSEST CLASS II GAS GIANT TO SAGITTARIUS A*
STUEMEAE FG-Y D8248 13 AT 1.93 LY

IMAGE LINK 6
CLOSEST ROCKY ICE PLANET TO SAGITTARIUS A*
STUEMEAE FG-Y D8248 16 AT 1.93 LY

IMAGE LINK 7
CLOSEST ROCKY PLANET TO SAGITTARIUS A*
STUEMEAE FG-Y D8248 16 G AT 1.93 LY
 
Last edited:

Kalpa

Kalpa
IMAGE LINK (PROOF STUEMEAE KM-W C1-4686 IS 2.17 LY FROM SAGITTARIUS A*)

IMAGE LINK 2
CLOSEST TERRAFORMABLE WATER WORLD TO SAGITTARIUS A*
STUEMEAE KM-W C1-4686 6 AT 2.17 LY

(in my opinion, the terraformable should also count for any parent planet category, in this case CLOSEST WATER WORLD TO SAGITTARIUS A*, but if the jury disagrees...

IMAGE LINK 3
CLOSEST WATER WORLD TO SAGITTARIUS A*
STUEMEAE KM-W C1-4686 7 AT 2.17 LY

...although in this particular case the planet 7 has higher orbit than planet 6 and in all likelihood will at some point of time be closer to Sagi A* than planet 6 and should be considered to be closer to Sagi A* nevertheless...)
 
Last edited:

R3tCrick3t

R
Jack Luminous said:
Hmm...that community goal seems very interesting, nice to see us exploring folks get some attention! The mission description could use some debugging though :D

A comment on Y-class stars - I've seen many, many examples of these with a solar mass of 0.0078. Do you think we've hit the lowest value here?
Click to expand...


its actually the lowest mass at all types of stars
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom