facepalm
- - - Updated - - -
sorry... ancient religions, languages and history are a huge hobby of mineyour guys' lack of understanding and butchering of google links is making me groan hard
carry on.
Only 10% of my posts are serious - but even I'm not sure exactly which 10%
I liked the original spelling - "Butching of google links"
I totally understand! as i said, carry on.
Just know that some where out there I'm shaking my head haha
Since this plague is spreading in groups of 3 systems at a time,
Just thinking we might need 3 UA's in the same place at the same time. And see if they interact with each other... (or has that been tried?)
I noticed in GalNet that Lady Kahina "went missing", and thought, "Awesome! Maybe Drew's suggestions to FD finally got accepted!" But I read a few pages back that Lady Kahina was merely being pulled from the ED universe. I know this doesn't mean its the "end" of the whole UA story arc, but I have to say I'm pretty disappointed with FD. I remember Drew saying that he had even put together a story and events that Elite Dangerous' game mechanics supported. It seemed Drew was willing to do his part to contribute to the greatness of the Elite universe, but FD isn't willing to meet him even half way.
I think it's unlikely anything will happen for the reasons I've stated previously but I think it may be the most likely of what we have right now.
I suspect Kerrash is saying "you need a Babel fish".
You won't need an AFMU that fast. Short transits (~30-60Ly) are unlikely to need (critical) repairs. Time spent in Witchspace/offline/on pad in station does not accrue damage, so you just need to limit your SC/normal space time upon finding one.
I got an Unknown Artefact btw, I'm in a bit of a state of shock right now to be honest, really need to go lie down.
Disagree i think it is some sort of clue.
facepalm
- - - Updated - - -
sorry... ancient religions, languages and history are a huge hobby of mineyour guys' lack of understanding and butchering of google links is making me groan hard
carry on.
It makes me winch. If someone was to apply occams razor to this thread , there would be genocide
Allow me:
During the UA discovery (April May) FDev was in negotiations with Microsoft behind closed doors. We all thought there was some major secret mystery thing in the works. Turns out they were just working on powerplay and cqc. No awesome hidden mystery. Just Xbox release.
They're going to let us think something is there so that we stay hyped for thargoids. But in reality the UA isn't making them any cash and they arnt going to spend money and assets on the chase.
I get that they didn't think the community would react like this but come on, a little closure for our efforts would go a long way. Hell, the user who did the Soontill hoax put more effort into that than the devs have. Seriously if you're new here you should look it up. He made a replica of the voyager plate complete with thargoids and the Soontill system all from a sound sample played through an audio to visual program.
If this UA has no real purpose yet, and the devs implement something in the future that couldn't possibly be solved today, that classifies the entire UA mystery in its current state as a hoax.
Let that sink in. One of the most positive threads on this forum is for content that doesn't even exist.

I got an Unknown Artefact btw, I'm in a bit of a state of shock right now to be honest, really need to go lie down.
It jumped it lost Anacondas, I took down the shields but just could not get a bead on the cargo hatch, mainly I think due to the panic, when it happens your heart starts racing.
My shields were going down (against a bloomin T9), using shield cell banks I then resorted to trying hatch breakers, it took 2 breakers to get the UA out.
Sorry no screenshots, I wasn't taking any risks with anything besides getting just straight to dock and landing.
Congratulations!
- - - Updated - - -
Yes, it's a clue that some of the theories being thrown about here are completely bonkers.
Firstly:
Whether or not you like my methods, my conclusion is still reasonable.
That is - Yes we are on the right track - because we have tried the UA with lots of different things. But we are not quite there yet because there is something we have missed - possibly something quite unlikely - like a Babel fish. I further suspect that this object acts like a translator.
If you find this "bonkers" then I'm sorry but you have not been paying attention.
Secondly:
Right through history there have been people who have original ideas and there have been those who say they are "Bonkers"
Thirdly:
I have assumed that this forum would encourage people to come up with new and different ideas. If you only want the old ideas rehashed you are going nowhere fast.
If people do not want original thoughts I'll be quite please to leave the room.
Firstly:
Whether or not you like my methods, my conclusion is still reasonable.
That is - Yes we are on the right track - because we have tried the UA with lots of different things. But we are not quite there yet because there is something we have missed - possibly something quite unlikely - like a Babel fish. I further suspect that this object acts like a translator.
If you find this "bonkers" then I'm sorry but you have not been paying attention.
Secondly:
Right through history there have been people who have original ideas and there have been those who say they are "Bonkers"
Thirdly:
I have assumed that this forum would encourage people to come up with new and different ideas. If you only want the old ideas rehashed you are going nowhere fast.
If people do not want original thoughts I'll be quite please to leave the room.
Worryingly, if the mystery, once known, turns out to be judged as 'bonkers' by the community, then necessarily any correct theory will also be judged to be bonkers by that same community.
The problem - to echo what has already been said plenty of times - is that when someone comes up with a 'bonkers' theory - by law of probability, they probably don't have their own UA to test it with. So we end up with a profligacy of, let's face it, most likely wrong, theories - instead of a CMDR summarising what they thought, AND the results of their test.
Need more UAs, and then we can all start to calm down on here a bit.