Weekly store update.

  • Thread starter Deleted member 110222
  • Start date
Yeah, y'know what provides them with a revenue stream? Everyone who bought the base game, and then everyone who bought Horizons... This isn't a fee-to-pay model, so it shouldn't have such exploitative support.
..but it's not exploitative? At no point do you have to buy any cosmetics. If you don't want to shell out extra on the game, simply don't, problem solved. Fd even have the good grace to avoid rubbing optional extras in our faces. We only saw these new skins because uni made a topic.

It's pay-to-win microtransactions that are genuinely exploitative, thankfully these don't exist in ed. If they did, many players would have abandoned the game in a heartbeat - on the other hand look at how WoT has thrived, so let's be grateful for small mercies I guess..
 
..but it's not exploitative? At no point do you have to buy any cosmetics. If you don't want to shell out extra on the game, simply don't, problem solved. Fd even have the good grace to avoid rubbing optional extras in our faces. We only saw these new skins because uni made a topic.
Is that the 'It's optional! It doesn't matter!' argument/defence I see before my eyes? I think so...

True, no one has guns being held to their head 'forcing' them to buy this content. But cosmetic and character customisation is a major element in countless games these days; it is gameplay, and must be seen as part of the essential whole. Elite is partly an RPG, after all, and customisation is a fundamental part of that. The only choice a player in Elite has is between absolutely eff all customisation options - and having customisation at all. If you want to customise, you do not have a choice.

If that's not taking advantage of people, then I don't know what is. If they were cheaper, I wouldn't have as big of a beef, because a tiny price tag would usually just about match up the effort put into them. People could say 'Well, what do you expect?' when they point out shoddily implemented idents or palette swaps of palette swaps (Contender/Challenger packs). That everyone has to pay for the same colours on each ship adds insult to injury. If you're going to create lazy content, at least apply it across all ships in a single purchase.

Btw, I still can't reliably get the correct amount of total characters on the ident entry, so not only did I pay for lazy work I paid for work that doesn't actually function properly.

It's pay-to-win microtransactions that are genuinely exploitative, thankfully these don't exist in ed. If they did, many players would have abandoned the game in a heartbeat - on the other hand look at how WoT has thrived, so let's be grateful for small mercies I guess..
I think I might have less issue if they did sell a few ships here and there. It would at least ensure they put some effort into what they're hawking... Or maybe we'd just get palette swapped identikit ships instead (no asset changes, but hey! this black part of the ship is now white! yay for colour channel sliders leading to new content and profits!).
 
I agree with Fray that every vanity item costs money, which is a pitty.
Imho there should be some standard customization options within the game for free, for anyone to use, the military, vibrant and tactical paints for example.
More exclusive and or complex items could then be purchased when desired.
There are enough games using that system and it works.

It is what it is though and I don't realy have a problem with it, at least it's just vanity and not gameplay effecting stuff.
As soon as FD introduce gameplay effecting items I stop playing, no more WoT situations in my life, ever.
 
It is what it is though and I don't realy have a problem with it, at least it's just vanity and not gameplay effecting stuff.
I'd argue it is, though, for the reasons I touched upon in my previous post. The argument 'it's just cosmetic, it doesn't matter' equates to saying 'how our characters/ships/cars/etc in games look don't matter and doesn't affect our experience', which is obviously a completely absurd notion.

Just because Elite's cosmetic options and support have been so lacklustre doesn't mean it should stay that way. We're now all so inured to it (I have 1100 Bethesdabucks Frontier points ready to burn. remember, console players never always pay the actual price for a given item, every single item in the store regardless of 'points' price will cost 300/£3.19. and of course they discount points-relative-to-pounds the more points you're prepared to get, punishing frugal, exact choices and rewarding/encouraging indulgence) that we don't seem to think anything will change.

It's kind of a mass commercial Stockholm syndrome, and I don't see it improving - in fact it stands to reason that it'll only ever get worse (it seems 2.4 will add even more cosmetic options, most or all with price tags).
 
Pretty poor offering this time, IMHO. I assume the new suits are the same ones featured in the 2.4 trailer?

But thanks for the heads up, Unik0rn.

I estimate I've possibly spent more than I did on the actual game on cosmetic improvements. It will have to be something really dang special to make me part with any more £'s.
 

Deleted member 110222

D
Pretty poor offering this time, IMHO. I assume the new suits are the same ones featured in the 2.4 trailer?

But thanks for the heads up, Unik0rn.

I estimate I've possibly spent more than I did on the actual game on cosmetic improvements. It will have to be something really dang special to make me part with any more £'s.

No, the latest suits aren't from the 2.4 cinematic. The suits in that video were the Explorer pack.

Actually, the first we saw of the latest suits was way back when in the first multi-crew livestreams.
 
Back
Top Bottom