What GPU do you have in your PC?

Kingtutuk

Kingtutuk
I don`t have any gripes about my Asus GTX 960 2GB Strix and run Horizons in Ultra.
The rest of my setup includes, Asus M5A78L-M Motherboard, AMDFX 6300 six core, 32GB DDR3 Ram 667Mhz Dual Channel, Seiki 720P tv as Monitor, Windows 10 Home.
 
Last edited:

MottiKhan

MottiKhan
Still running along fine with a GTX 760 for now.

With the GTX 1060 coming out this month for $250 and matching the GTX 980 for specs, it's looking good for a card upgrade. I especially like the TPD at 120W. That's 50 watts lower than my 760.
 

nosscar

nosscar
Still using my msi 3gb r9 280 i bought 18mths ago for 159 uk pounds, it still plays ED happily at a steady 60fps in space, 40-45 on planets, and my other older games ok. I will keep using it for a while yet, when the time comes i need to upgrade, the best bang for buck gpu i think just now in my price range would be the rx 480, and hopefully will get it cheaper if i wait long enough. But that GTX 1060 above for $250 looking good too.
 
Last edited:

Necronaught

Necronaught
AMD 7970 3 Gb, i5 2500k @4.5Ghz, 16 Gb Ram runs everything like a dream. Star Citizen is the only game I struggle with. Some how probably not something anyone should gauge their cards on. I can even run Arma 3 maxed out on 100 + player servers and it's 4 years old.
 

Vex Malleus

Vex Malleus
cygnusa said:
Someone have cooling problems? What cooling problems? ;P
No this isn't my system... haha

View attachment 109593
Click to expand...
HAHAHAHAHA

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -

Melf said:
At least I'm not the only one with a retro-feeling when playing E:D :cool: Got an ATI HD 5650 with 1GB.
Click to expand...
lol I just got a Geforce GTX 960 with 4GB. I wish I could have afforded the 980, but it was still a huge upgraded from a failing GTX 580. :D
 

Zieman

Zieman
ASUS Strix GTX980Ti OC here, running E: D pretty much with equal performance with same settings ("Ultra minus" = Ambient Occlusion & Bloom off, Planet stuff at high, FXAA) than the GTX780 I had previously.

Oh, there's one detail I forgot to mention: GTX980Ti @ 2160p performs just as well with same E: D settings as GTX780 @ 1080p... ;)
 

znôrt

znôrt
gtx980ti running e:d w/o issues. the game's poor optimization is appalling but more than offset by sheer artistic genius. however, if this is what it takes to render desert monotonic planet surfaces, i wonder how it will pan out with planets full of life, even if it's alien life.
 

the100thmonkey

the100thmonkey
znôrt said:
gtx980ti running e:d w/o issues. the game's poor optimization is appalling but more than offset by sheer artistic genius. however, if this is what it takes to render desert monotonic planet surfaces, i wonder how it will pan out with planets full of life, even if it's alien life.
Click to expand...
Only people who've never played Space Engineers call this game badly-optimised. That game can bring a 1080 to its knees.
 
Last edited:

Cmdr Ultra

Cmdr Ultra
the100thmonkey said:
Given the naming conventions employed by Nvidia, I'd never describe a 1080 as "mid-range." The 1070 would be the top-end of such a classification, in my book.

Sorry I meant mid-range chip with - Titan's & 1080Ti's being GP102
1080 & 1070 being GP104
1060 being GP106

Just the same as the 900 series with - Titan & 980ti being GM200
980 & 970 being GM204
960 being GM206

1080 is certainly a high-end card. Guess they call the top chip's 'Enthusiast' now.
Click to expand...
 

JRok

JRok
GTX 970

I was running high settings, but still a little choppy looking when pulling maneuvers in the asteroid belts, so I'm running med now... anyway, these tired old eyes can tell the difference.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom