What GPU do you have in your PC?

FutronBob

FutronBob
Radeon HD 6770, which I've had for 4 years. My processor is an Athlon II x4 645.

I play on default high settings for the main game and get good enough FPS (above 30 in stations, 45ish rings, and 60 in open space/sc). For Horizons I have most things set to low and I get a bit above 20 FPS when landed/driving, which is good enough for now.
 

Ydiss

Ydiss
Deggial said:
Currently: Nvidia GTX 460 (don't laugh!)
In the near future, probably March: Nvidia GTX 980 Ti (VR upgrade)
Click to expand...

Same here. Considering it's the very minimum spec for 2.0, it handles everything really well. It's a bit slow on planets but just about playable.

I'll be getting an upgrade soon though. If only so the game doesn't take five minutes to load every time (and I'd like shadow play).
 

Quantis Trap

Quantis Trap
EVGA nVidia GTX 960 which was purchased specifically for this game a few months back. My iMac has a nVidia 760 I believe. There's also my XBox One, but that doesn't count for this I'm sure. I have two PC/Mac accounts and the XBox account so I'm a full service tester. :D

I started my Elite play with two SLIed nVidia GTX 580s on the PC, but it was way too hot.
 
Last edited:

Fangwulf

Fangwulf
2x SLI MSI Nvidia GTX 680's.
Does that count as two for the stats? :)

Edit: And my laptop has a GTX 950M (though I have not tried Horizons on it yet, just regular ED).
 
Last edited:

bigtaff

bigtaff
nVidea GTX675M 2Gb, running at 50fps in space and around 30 fps on planets and stations, most settings on Ultra @1920 x 1080
 

sndle9

S
nVidia GTX Titan here (earlier 6Gb version, before Titan X). capped at 60 in space, around 45-50 on planets. Everything on Ultra @ 2560 x 1440.
 

Wendiga

Wendiga
GTX 970 G1 here and works great, ultra & 2k.

And ATI Radeon 4600 in other house, all low and cant run Horizons.
 
Last edited:

Badben

Badben
msi gaming gtx 970 (just bought it to replace gtx 660ti). GTX 970 is by far the most popular card at the moment, it has #1 spot on futuremark hardware, and on this forum as I write this there are 23 gtx 970's, next highest is gtx 980 with 11. I'm surprised actually that the R9 390 isn't more popular, only 5 here, it has better raw numbers than the gtx 970, especially ram and bus speed (8g vs 4 g / 512 vs 256) and is priced about the same. I bought the nvidia card specifically because of it's lower numbers actually, the fact that it competes with the r9 390 using generally lower stats for me is a sign of good build quality and good optimization, not to mention the lower power draw and temps. I've never had problems with Nvidia cards either, the same can't be said for AMD.

edit: not trying to start a war here, AMD also makes great cards, it's really more about preference.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom