General / Off-Topic Why do we mutate?

Back in the 50's, a family member attended a lecture in Canada. The lecturer had a small briefcase with an unusual teaching aid- a bike chain.
The chain when twisted formed a double helix.

That lecturer was Francis Crick. Maybe you know the name? Crick and Watson are credited with the discovery of DNA structure. They were able to do so because of the work on DNA X-Ray crystallography by an uncredited scientist named Rosalind Franklin.

This is a top down look at the helix:

crystallograph1_med.jpeg


As you can see, the credit for the concept really goes to the lady.

Anyway, the original Watson-Crick paper had a startlingly correct insight.
The chemical structures of the 4 bases that make up the base pairs crosslinking in that X in the picture above have a property that drives mutations. This is one of the bases, Guanine:

150px-Guanin.svg.png

Guanine base pairs with Thymine.

You can see the structure is 2 rings, one pentagon, and one hexagon. Every apex has a carbon atom, unless a Nitrogen one substitutes - you see the N's there.

This whole thing is held together by the interaction of the electron clouds around each atom. Atoms that end up sharing an electron are connected by a bond, shown as a line in the structure.
Because that is a quantum mechanism, there are some unstable characteristics.

It is possible that a shared electron in the cloud could take a position much closer to one atom than the other. So much so that the bond weakens. When that occurs, the bond stretches like a rubber band. And that distorts the shape of the structure. All 4 of the bases have ring structures, and undergo this effect periodically. That's a problem. But only if the train is on time.



Locomotive.jpeg


This is a little train.
It chugs down a track, made of 2 metal rails with wooden cross pieces. That track is just like DNA structure, just flattenned out into a ladder. In our cells, proteins periodically slide along the DNA just like little trains going down tracks, looking for things to fix. If they find a mismatch or an error, they edit the DNA right there.

If that basepair happens to be a G-T pair, and at that moment an electron is in the wrong place, the structure is distorted, and the protein gets confused.
It's not very smart, so it does its one job, and edits the DNA.
And just like that, we have a mutation. Because when you edit the correct base pair, you introduce an error.

You may imagine the billions of base pairs, in your own DNA for a moment, repeated in every nucleus in every cell. It's flickering with these quantum alterations, and the consequent error rate is making us change. Making us age, and get cancer, yes, but also producing evolution on a grander scale.

Watson & Crick predicted this in 1953.
It was found to be true by observation in 2018.

 
Interesting stuff.

I guess it shouldn't be a surprise that mutation is a biological imperative.

I mean, we know evolution happens.
If our DNA was "set in stone" then there'd be no way for evolution to test out it's "survival of the fittest" mantra.
Sparrows would have all remained black and there'd be none with lighter-coloured feathers to take advantage of the Victorian smog.

I guess that, these days, we're just better at detecting mutations and understanding them for what they are, rather than dismissing them as "curiosities" or "freaks".
 
Interesting stuff.

I guess it shouldn't be a surprise that mutation is a biological imperative.

I mean, we know evolution happens.
If our DNA was "set in stone" then there'd be no way for evolution to test out it's "survival of the fittest" mantra.
Sparrows would have all remained black and there'd be none with lighter-coloured feathers to take advantage of the Victorian smog.

I guess that, these days, we're just better at detecting mutations and understanding them for what they are, rather than dismissing them as "curiosities" or "freaks".
Many things, including mutations, have become clearer to us with the development of technology. Perhaps one day we will perfectly understand the nature of something that we do not really believe in existence.
 
Tell that to the creationists!
I guess that's the difference between evolution and Evolution (with a capital E).

Evolution (with the capital E) carries a lot of baggage that challenges religious doctrine.
I'd like to think that almost everybody accepts that evolution happens.
 
Updating this with some work from University of Surrey:

The team, part of Surrey's research programme in the exciting new field of quantum biology, have shown that this modification in the bonds between the DNA strands is far more prevalent than has hitherto been thought. The protons can easily jump from their usual site on one side of an energy barrier to land on the other side. If this happens just before the two strands are unzipped in the first step of the copying process, then the error can pass through the replication machinery in the cell, leading to what is called a DNA mismatch and, potentially, a mutation.

This work looks at the position of protons in the hydrogen bonds between the bases - the crosslinks in the railway tracks- instead of the base structures. There is quantum jitter in the crosslinks too, causing the wrong bases to form links. In this case, the jitter would self correct in the very next instant. The problem arises if the DNA decides to unzip right at that spot, just before the jitter fixes it.

It unfortunately unzips to copy itself, so we are going to get bad copies.
 
Back
Top Bottom