Orbital, or Centrifugal gravity when interacting in 1st person, on Orbis and Coreolis stations. Would live to see, 0g at smaller stations, and when moving around the ship while in flight. Either in Odessey or later. Reactions?
Why Elite will always be better than Star Citizen: Gravity - or the lack there of.
- Thread starter Ourselfish
- Start date
I think whoever has small seismic charges first will win the space race.
OP, I agree with the 0g on outposts (smaller stations)! If Frontier breaks rules and has magical gravity on outposts, I will be very disappointed!
Or just magnetic boots on outposts ofc
yeah but what about high G planets? like atm a pilot can comfortably land on and drive around 9G planets - ie - an environment where they would way 9 times what they weigh on earth
EDIT - I'm fine with this btw - not complaining, i think a lot more compromises in realism should be made for the sake of gameplay tbh. but just saying,Gravity isn't treated as realistic all the time
EDIT - I'm fine with this btw - not complaining, i think a lot more compromises in realism should be made for the sake of gameplay tbh. but just saying,Gravity isn't treated as realistic all the time
Yeah the most realism we are going to get is magboots with empty environments so we cant tell if theres gravity or not. For example every cockpit in the game right now.yeah but what about high G planets? like atm a pilot can comfortably land on and drive around 9G planets - ie - an environment where they would way 9 times what they weigh on earth
EDIT - I'm fine with this btw - not complaining, i think a lot more compromises in realism should be made for the sake of gameplay tbh. but just saying,Gravity isn't treated as realistic all the time
Imho ED will always be better in many perspectives over SC, in being a real complete game to begin with.
Sheesh I'm so glad I picked ED over SC to invest in back in the days.
Sheesh I'm so glad I picked ED over SC to invest in back in the days.
ED has actually game desing.SC doesnt.
Just like in movies/tv, gravity on everything is usually just a convenience. Much like all aliens look a bit humanoid. CG has altered the later a bit but its still difficult.
I'm a rare bean who likes underwater sequences in games (used to be a diver even, yea I've had many bizarre jobs). The no gravity sections of games don't bother me. I have seen, though, what appears to be a majority of players having extreme difficulty in orientation and maneuvers in 0g/ under water scenarios.
We shall see, perhaps. Don't know if any outposts will be walkable.
As for high G worlds. We'd need to be moved around in water tanks or something to just not be crushed under our own weight.
I'm a rare bean who likes underwater sequences in games (used to be a diver even, yea I've had many bizarre jobs). The no gravity sections of games don't bother me. I have seen, though, what appears to be a majority of players having extreme difficulty in orientation and maneuvers in 0g/ under water scenarios.
We shall see, perhaps. Don't know if any outposts will be walkable.
As for high G worlds. We'd need to be moved around in water tanks or something to just not be crushed under our own weight.
I agree with you, why compare a whole car (ED) to a set of tires (SC).
It's always puzzled me as to why the orbital docks have ramps inside the hangars...
Game play > everything else > realism > launching a live game > SCyeah but what about high G planets? like atm a pilot can comfortably land on and drive around 9G planets - ie - an environment where they would way 9 times what they weigh on earth
EDIT - I'm fine with this btw - not complaining, i think a lot more compromises in realism should be made for the sake of gameplay tbh. but just saying,Gravity isn't treated as realistic all the time
We have magic physics already, what with thrust boosting capping out at 'x' mps rather than infinitely accelerating and SC doing all the work for you. Quite immersion breaking tbh but hey, emergent gameplay (etc.).
To be honest, infinite acceleration would make for really quirky gameplay so capping speed makes sense, from a certain point of view.
Lowering the landing gear or cargo hatch causing some sort of aerodynamic drag on the other hand will always be hilarious (though it's nice to have something for additional, huh, "braking" power)
Friend, we know next to nothing about how (or even if) EDO will work yet. It's a bit early for victory dances on that front.
If you want to just deride SC's general struggles with gravity and reality, that's totally fine though
Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/iadl2s/why_artificial_gravity_plates_are_silly/
Source: https://i.imgur.com/am99n3U.mp4
Source: https://i.imgur.com/7PSGKn2.mp4
Source: https://i.imgur.com/Bx3Svkp.mp4
Source: https://i.imgur.com/LEG4YNi.mp4
Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/hiai5x/heavy_precipitation_in_lorville_today/
If you want to just deride SC's general struggles with gravity and reality, that's totally fine though
Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/iadl2s/why_artificial_gravity_plates_are_silly/
Source: https://i.imgur.com/am99n3U.mp4
Source: https://i.imgur.com/7PSGKn2.mp4
Source: https://i.imgur.com/Bx3Svkp.mp4
Source: https://i.imgur.com/LEG4YNi.mp4
Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/hiai5x/heavy_precipitation_in_lorville_today/
@777DriverWe have magic physics already, what with thrust boosting capping out at 'x' mps rather than infinitely accelerating and SC doing all the work for you. Quite immersion breaking tbh but hey, emergent gameplay (etc.).
This one got me good.
That’s actually the only bug from that collection that they’ve managed to tackle. (Presumably because it was allowing pirates to hoover up people’s ships, and then sell all the conjoined cargo from the entangled physics grids
)Comfortingly they have added lots more bugs since though
Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/k2x0aw/yo_my_homie_is_having_a_seizure_this_game_is_so/