Even if it made the game worse?
Michael
Define worse.
Even if it made the game worse?
Michael
This. It does not bode well for future commitments, support, or respect for backers and customers in general.
Unfortunately they re-iterated in black and white that there would be an offline mode of play. So who could trust that even if they did?...
In the current circumstance the only real thing they could do practically is to re-iterate in black and white that if ever the servers were to be closed that something would be put in place to allow people to continue to play in some form or another. Of course, the manner in which the news of the removal of the offline mode was released unfortunately means that any such promise would be taken with a more than a pinch of salt.
Even if it made the game worse?
Michael
From your perspective.Actually, I take the opposite opinion - it bodes VERY well for future commitments and support. Because they took a decision to make sure the game was *better*, and stayed at a particular level of quality, rather than producing an average experience.
In actuality, it shows a BETTER support for the backers and customer in general.
Even if it made the game worse?
Michael
Sometimes, keeping your word is your worst option. Unless you are really living in a world defined by black and white, that is.Really well said. FD should keep his word.![]()
Yes.Even if it made the game worse?
From your perspective.
Yes.
And I really mean it.
Maybe I would have replied differently a year ago, but not anymore.
I can answer for me.... yes. You guys should make the game become the best possible with the presence of an offline mode.
I can answer for me.... yes. You guys should make the game become the best possible with the presence of an offline mode.
How is not being able to play the game having spent hundreds if not thousands of pound on it an improvement?
All this the offline mode would make the online game worse is a side track.
You could have an offline mode and still the same online game it just costs more to do and they did promise that and many brought the game only because of that.
At the very least a full refund should be offered.
Not even sure how it could be worse lol.
We'll stop whining as soon as the refund arrives. We'll be back though once the servers aren't profitable for FD anymore and join you when its your turn.
I guess if you bought the game and had no home net or very poor home net you'd just be happy huh?
..let's wait until they cut something YOU want.
I am a software developer and I believe if they really wanted to they could do a single player offline version. It would take more work but a lot less than some of the expansions that they are offering.
Again? So this will be your PR Mantra, straight from EAs mouth, huh? NO DRM, you only need to be connected to the internet LMAO
There is no arm twisting. Circumstances are simply staff we have available and what could be spared to work on something that doesn't support the core design of the game.
Michael
Even if it made the game worse?
Michael
So, a question comes in my mind : why trying to share universe then ? Make two distinct worlds !As mentioned in the newsletter thread the game has changed a lot since the initial kickstarter. One of the biggest changes is the importance of the the offline component to manage the galaxy and interactions. This isn't something we can translate into an offline experience as we'd effectively have to make a new game world - we couldn't share the same world and that throws out the intent for a shared universe.
Michael
Offline being no longer a feature is unfortunate for some people, but I guess they are collateral if it means a better game for the majority of the players. Namely, the ones playing Open, Private or Solo and getting a truly dynamic universe.