Man, I really wish we could get some colourful habitat birds for SA. Any of these would add so much life to my tropical houses and SA sections...Birds that can be habitat:
- Scarlet ibis
- Roseatte spoonbill
- American Flamingo, Chillean Flamingo
Man, I really wish we could get some colourful habitat birds for SA. Any of these would add so much life to my tropical houses and SA sections...Birds that can be habitat:
- Scarlet ibis
- Roseatte spoonbill
- American Flamingo, Chillean Flamingo
I think central American pack could also work well as a scenery pack, I think we could have many nice themed central American pieces.Maybe Central America animal pack with:
1. Spider monkey - utilizes brachiation
2. Three toed sloth - sorry but it’s much cuter and recognizable than two toed.
3. Tamandua - smaller, arboreal cousin of Giant anteater and super sweet
4. Peccary - lives in many different biomes
5. Kinkajou - funny and cute oddball
6. Ocellated turkey - spectacular bird
7. Ocelot - small cat and the most requested one right now
Leaving just Howlers, spectacled bears and coati for a different pack.
I mean, there have been some great gaps plugged in South America rep this year, but even aside from primates (there's 3 categories of SA monkey which each deserve to be in) and birds I would say a Sloth would be #1 slot for the continent?Aight, as the title suggests, does SA need tropical species to feel more complete? And exclude birds and primates, please; those are kinda obvious, so let's avoid any mention of them (I'm talking to YOU. You know who you are)
I feel like Argentina could get better representation, as in the lower areas, like the pampas and Patagonia. Also, Chile, I.e. the mountains.
What're some solid suggestions?
A resounding YES. Tropical South America, especially the Amazon, has always and remains one of the most incomplete regions in the game. The incredibly disappointing "South America" pack did very little for this region.does SA need tropical species to feel more complete? And exclude birds and primates
Especially when compared to its size and biodiversity I think the Amazon (for habitat animals) is the most incomplete region in the game.One could argue that South America or at the very least the Amazon is the only region in the game that so far that has a well rounded roster of animals which to me makes it feel more complete than others in some ways. It's the only region that also with a strong selection of exhibit animals to fill out the gaps between the habitats.
Till south america has as many monkeys as africa has antelopes, it will never fill complete as both should ve the diverse backbone of their sections where pick and choose a few that fits.Aight, as the title suggests, does SA need tropical species to feel more complete? And exclude birds and primates, please; those are kinda obvious, so let's avoid any mention of them (I'm talking to YOU. You know who you are)
I feel like Argentina could get better representation, as in the lower areas, like the pampas and Patagonia. Also, Chile, I.e. the mountains.
What're some solid suggestions?
Me when people ignore the rulesEdit: Oops, didnt see the no monkeys but hey point still stands
I would really love all of those four. And on top of that I think three of them all are very possible inclusions.Yes. Coatis, Sloths and Peccaries are pretty essential. And I could add 10 more relevant species without touching on primates ir birds.
Also, what's the point of excluding primates from the question? That's like discussing the Oceania roster without marsupials.
And when it comes to zoo animals, there are very few but very important non-tropical SA animals:
- Mara
- Rhea
- Vicuña/Guanaco
- Spectacled bear
There are more candudates like pudus, grisons, more armadillos which I'd love to have but are mpstly irrelevant to international collections.
Look at these pictures I took yesterday:I would really love all of those four. And on top of that I think three of them all are very possible inclusions.
Even tho we have Llama already, Guanaco just have that different, almost prehistoric, vibe. Even one of those two can be possible through anniversary or like an ungulate oddball (Lechwe, Water Buffalo, Wildebeest and even Llama itself)
Oh my God, you're living the dream man!Look at these pictures I took yesterday:
View attachment 338847
Guanacos apparently can drink seawater. I felt like at the patagonia equivalent of a watering hole. There were also maras, sea lions, and an armadillo but they didn't fit in the frame.
I'd absolutely love to recreate this in the game but we'd never get the right species.
Oh definitely. The Big Hairy Armadillos are underrated. They completely ignore everything and everyone. They just go where they want at a set speed, and don't stop for no one. I managed to picture one drinking water.Oh my God, you're leaving the dream man!
Always had a soft spot for southern South America. Hope to visit it myself in some distant future
Looks great !
Oh definitely. The Big Hairy Armadillos are underrated. They completely ignore everything and everyone.
Look at these pictures I took yesterday:
View attachment 338847
Guanacos apparently can drink seawater. I felt like at the patagonia equivalent of a watering hole. There were also maras, sea lions, and an armadillo but they didn't fit in the frame.
I'd absolutely love to recreate this in the game but we'd never get the right species.
That is the whole point., Why discuss something we already know/agree on? If I had allowed primates, many people would've just said that and we likely would've forgotten about any other candidatesAlso, what's the point of excluding primates from the question? That's like discussing the Oceania roster without marsupials.
I also would like that. And termites. And beehives. And naked mole rats colony.Also am i the only one who kinda wants a leafcutter ant exhibit in some way?