Then again, would you want "followers"? You know what: Maybe the "haters" rather are capable to think for themselves and dont need neckbeard internet celebrities to do that for them.
Game Discussions Star Citizen Discussion Thread v12
- Thread starter Yaffle
- Start date
-
- Tags
- star citizen
My dear LittleAnt, why would anyone seriously attempt running software with a stated 20Gb RAM minimum requirement when their platform has only 16Gb RAM?
That’s like planning on driving a thousand miles when you only have enough fuel to get to the end of the driveway.
That’s like planning on driving a thousand miles when you only have enough fuel to get to the end of the driveway.
Also, it’s like having the fattest fibre in the world but still not reaching the rack ;-)
The minimal requirement is 8Go of free ram, not 20Go.
I talk about 20Go because SC can use up to 20Go so need a pagefile correctly configured if you have less than 20Go of free ram. You find the same way of using memory in Flight Simulator and nobody is shocked.
But for sure, it works only fine when you don't mess up your pagefile and you have a SSD.
Imagine the hoops you'll need to jump through to get the game running when they bring all the new "starengine" improvements from the demo (pre-render?) to live.
But don't worry, it will probably never happen.
Duuuuude!
That's like taking 600M to not finish a game when you said you'd get it done for 65M.
Yeah, ragga man! Play da muzic.
Where have you seen that the flight model of SQ42 is not finalised ? I think you're confusing with SC (which will get its last flight model from SQ42).
If you focus on Polish I think you can have good success with pickled gherkins.
That is its entire purpose.
Garbage programming. It'd not only be completely wrong to do this, but it's incredibly slow and will cause massive stuttering as resources get loaded back in synchronously through an avalanche of page faults on random threads.
i dont do any of this.
Mike & Berks discussing more 'never been done before' things coming to SC
Hahaha. "Like Elite Dangerous. But better. Red or something."
Ay, and Cryengine is already fairly notorious on that front to start with.
Then add in the recent history of CIG tools being somewhat lambasted in post-mortems:
And the general gossip of Rastar etc being similarly suspect. (Hey, it's probably a reskinned Cryengine tool after all
). And I wouldn't be surprised if we get similar reports there eventually. (Beyond the current it's breaking the shops stuff). Overall I'm not sure CIG are excelling in this area...So even if CIG could finangle a way to license out 'Starengine' (IE cut some complex Crytek/Amazon deal with the rights holders to the core engine), I doubt it'd sell like hot-cakes. More pie in the sky from some backers ultimately
Last edited:
Not to worry V. He's already given us his latest hot take
SQ42 in beta
They probably aim for christmas 2024 for the release.
Christmas 2024?
I’ll bet you a gift wrapped SATAball nothing will appear 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027. 2028 maybe.
I’ll bet you a gift wrapped SATAball nothing will appear 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027. 2028 maybe.
The reality of Sqn 404 being released isn't so bright unfortunately...an indefinite and as usual, undefined 'polishing' period (probably around an entire year from Ci~G's past efforts at similar distractions) followed by optimisation and a further finagling period of final polishing...let's not forget the incomplete and ultimately untested (from Yogi's comments during Citcon) flight model which has still to be added to their 'feature complete' game...Not to worry V. He's already given us his latest hot take
Q2 or Q3 2025 is my rough estimate.
As a marketing drive, Citcon did it's job, it gained the Empire of Roberts some much needed financial breathing space and development room but achieved little else bar offering more empty promises
Last edited:
