No Single Player Offline Mode then? [Part 2]

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.

Vlodec

Banned
I think many people need to brush up on what alpha/beta programs are...

You paid to be part of the program. You paid to have early access to the code and help with fixes/suggestions etc.

Being part of an alpha/beta program guarantees you nothing. Those mentioning Trading Standards etc. in the UK. This is nothing to do with them - you haven't bought a commercial product, you bought entry into a testing program. You've had exactly what you paid for.

And would you take the same tolerant view if FD had pulled the online game instead? Really?
 
Theory here: But by spending the extra 15 you change your buying a product at a later date, to a new contract of I wanna go ahead and make this money all be part of a new era in gaming. Oddly, I see this one happen at trade shows a lot. (from the legal side it's giving up customer rights because you are buying a warranty from FD..sort of) Altho, technically you could win a case to get back the original pre-order but not the 15.

Probably not even that. The discount is what we campaigned for, and got. You buy a whole new package, the beta, and you get a discount for using the previous payment to cover some of the cost. In effect you cancelled the previous purchase, and used the refund to buy the beta.
 
If you are not entitled legally to a refund then yes you are relying on the goodwill of the company involved to offer you one outside of the normal terms - that is what I meant by kindness. Please continue with your indignant rage though.

You are well aware that for ages companies have tried to misrepresent to customers what their legal rights are, right?

It's why you see so many cases of companies being froced by court to pay out fines or compensations despite those companies trying to claim to their customers that they didn't have these rights.

They lost my trust when they pulled this stunt on us.
 
If you are not entitled legally to a refund then yes you are relying on the goodwill of the company involved to offer you one outside of the normal terms - that is what I meant by kindness. Please continue with your indignant rage though.
As you are no judge, you are in no position to "decide" what he is legally entitled to, neither is Frontier... that decision is up to court, in case he goes down that path.

Your "kind" rants, won't change anything...
 
No i mean offline mode!

Another angle, if you have a life outside of ED as 100% of us do, an evolving world will feel unrealistic to most of us as when ever you come to play the game alot would have changed! Especially if your only able to play the game once or twice a week (if im lucky). Even though i have played the game mostly online i do feel that once the full game is ready an offline experience would better suit myself and most probably anyone else who can only play this game occasionally. If your on the game every day then you would surely benefit from the experience that David Braben is pushing so hard for. But i feel this pushing so hard has just push alot of its customers away. Personally i would like to be immersed in a world for a few hours a week, everytime i play im going to be playing catch up and trying to learn what has changed. At least in an offline mode i can save my game and come back and continue where i left off, there can still be a dynamic market and all the other features, its just that they are managed by my stand alone install on my computer and influenced by AI input and my own.

Dont get me wrong im very excited by the features online will bring but it will only last a short while, once you have had a few battles PVP battles to your liking or not you will soon get bored and fed up with the constant catching up with whats going on. I really do feel that many will wish ED had an offline mode later down the line.

My decision now is a gamble, do i carry on and hope that the online experience wont get boring and annoying when only playing a few hours a week or get a refund while i still can (via my rights as a buyer).
 
Since you're here Michael and it seems pertinent to alot of people wondering why the refund policy isn't more lax in their favour; was there a high percentage of users with large amounts of gametime already racked up that applied for refunds?
 
And would you take the same tolerant view if FD had pulled the online game instead? Really?

False equivalency. The game was designed first and foremost with multiplayer in mind, not off-line single player. Off-line single player was a side-feature. If they couldn't deliver on multiplayer then the project would have serious issues and would most likely fail.
 
I fail to see why there cannot be an offline mode with optional periodic connectivity to add the content David claims the game needs to work, that way people could play on the plane, on the train, on a mid Atlantic cruise whatever situation that see's some people without an internet connection for any period, the whole notion of continued internet connectivity is nothing more than another round about way of anti piracy DRM.
 
We've also added a number of features and changed others. This is the nature of development. Did we want to drop offline support? No - we know this is an emotive feature for some players. We spent time and effort to try and find a workable solution which meant that the news was released later than we would have liked.

Michael

Offline was specifically punted as an option to encourage people to sign up who didn't want to play an MMO (it's the only reason I got on board). This is not in in the same league as adding paint jobs or changing the HUD colour.

Though in the interest of fairness could you please list the features that were added / improved instead of delivering offline? That would be most helpful in showing us that the best decisions were made.
 
And would you take the same tolerant view if FD had pulled the online game instead? Really?

Yes, I would have no choice, since that is what an alpha/beta test is. You are paying for that access and accept from the start that nothing is guaranteed and you are owed nothing. If you don't like the prospect of getting nothing then you should never join an alpha/beta test group.
 
Last edited:
Can someone explain to me why an offline mode would lead to an "empty game"? What content besides other players is there in multiplayer? Why would I NEED other players to influence economy and factions? If I want to play offline, I WANT to be the only one to influence the galaxy. It's actually one of my main reason for wanting an offline mode so I don't work towards a goal and suddenly 10 other players come in and work against the goal I have set for myself. And I wouldn't even know that other players have undermined my gameplay goals!

The whole "living breathing galaxy" is a very nice idea and good background, but how can it be the foundation for missions and story? Why would lack of online lead to an "empty" game? I really don't get this. You could have the same story and mission elements on the locally hosted galaxy server.

And besides, the game doesn't even have guilds / corps or chat channels, player to player text messaging in atrocious with the menu, there are no coop missions or "party" sized groups to tackle stuff. The game really has no multiplayer content except sandbox pvp atm. The announcing of "trading but no stolen cargo" in the newsletter does little to disuated my concerns that the multiplayer part of ED with be very lacking. It seems to me David Braben and the other designers never actually played an MMO and have no clue on how to build social features to create online emergent gameplay.

I am curious about something. Do you envision the game to be completely static? IE lets assume we got offline mode. Would you want that offline mode to be completely static? in the sense that say gold on station X costs y now and if you play the game for 1000 hours and go back to station x it will still cost y because it is static. Or would you expect the price to fluctuate? Either randomly to sorta give the impression of an economy or actually based on your and npc trading to have an actual economy?
 
Probably not even that. The discount is what we campaigned for, and got. You buy a whole new package, the beta, and you get a discount for using the previous payment to cover some of the cost. In effect you cancelled the previous purchase, and used the refund to buy the beta.

lolwhat. Seriously? Oh that's a special form of legalese...
 

Vlodec

Banned
False equivalency. The game was designed first and foremost with multiplayer in mind, not off-line single player. Off-line single player was a side-feature. If they couldn't deliver on multiplayer then the project would have serious issues and would most likely fail.

Where was it described as a "side feature"? I missed that.
 
Despite the fact that i'm angry I don't like to see someone ruin the fun of others at the premiere event

I'm angry. I'll be at the Premiere. I think if people want to protest, they shouldn't go. Make a video of yourself tearing up your ticket and post it on the forum, but don't ruin the night for everyone else.
 
Probably not even that. The discount is what we campaigned for, and got. You buy a whole new package, the beta, and you get a discount for using the previous payment to cover some of the cost. In effect you cancelled the previous purchase, and used the refund to buy the beta.

Yeah, I wasn't sure on that one. If I think I know something I'll stand behind it... this one falls into the seedy grey underworld of contractual precedent and that is the one that keeps movie industry in debate for decades.
 
You are well aware that for ages companies have tried to misrepresent to customers what their legal rights are, right?

It's why you see so many cases of companies being froced by court to pay out fines or compensations despite those companies trying to claim to their customers that they didn't have these rights.

They lost my trust when they pulled this stunt on us.
Unfortunately it is normal business, and don't even remotely blame David or Michael for that. A company will in the interest of investors, partners etc. always try to minimize losses.
Denying, claims of customers legal or not, is calculated as pure numbers, if the option to deny a refund holds the better numbers, legal department and controlling will force it that way.

Not nice, but often a fact in business.
 
I think they already knew that when they officially announced they'd be no offline mode.

Moderators, is there any reason why threads like this are still allowed and are not closed? Since there has been an 'official' response from Frontier Developments over this issue, and that dragging on a dead horse really isn't going to help.

Shok.

Since you seem to enjoy posting here I think you should do the moderator's jobs for them and ban yourself. Goodbye old chap.
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom