No Single Player Offline Mode then? [Part 2]

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Extremely condescending post, thanks for that.

What you consider a "benefit", I consider a poison. There are no benefits to online from my perspective.

I'll second that.

And the quote to which you're replying seems worthy of my friends words, which I posted on the last thread, sent to me via e-mail and pasted here with his permission:

As you know I’m not nearly as upset over dropping the offline mode since I don’t mind playing online single player. But what really burns me is the vicious hateful apologists who personally attack anyone who voices a criticism of FD or the game no matter how small. And FD allows it to continue hoping that these trolls will silence any opposition to FD decisions. So they keep smiling and presenting their positive happy optimistic spin praising backers for their fantastic support while ignoring the elephant in the room.
 
If you are unhappy with endless news feeds like PC-Gamer " http://www.pcgamer.com/elite-dangerous-refund-policy-detailed-after-offline-support-dropped " you need to ask FD why they have not issues any refunds yet to few of those unhappy costumers.


The issues is that this while the it is a minority you have been making a lot of noise! Which is very annoying having endless news feeds trashing FD.

Anyway thanks for keeping me entertained while we all "download" (yes from the internet) a huge update which I'm looking forward to playing.

V
 
Yes it would be that simple!!!!

I haven't yet decided if I would retract my refund request if David and Frontier would publicly state something like this:

---------
"We have heard you. We have felt your anguish. We messed up. We messed up *really* badly. Please forgive us. We would like to start earning your trust and respect back.

We are publicly committing to delivering you the offline single-player experience that you have made clear is important to you after we made the wrong creative decision in removing it.

We can't deliver offline to you right now, but X has been assigned the task of organizing and planning the delivery. Furthermore, from now on, you will get public monthly status reports that detail the progress being made. At any time during this process, you are welcome to get a full refund.

We really need your support at this critical time. Would you consider giving us a second chance?"
---------
 
[ redacted]

Did you have something constructive to say? Because I didn't understand what you meant.

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -

I know what procedural generation is and it's great for setting initial start conditions for a large arena - but once that has been seeded then you need to continually adjust it otherwise the whole universe will be inherently static outside of your little bubble - f.e. minecraft can procedurally generate infinite worlds - but it only simulates the area immediately surrounding the player. Again you'd need to specifically code something to 'spoof' the dynamic world for the offline mode as a separate codebase to what's being used on the servers...

Also FYI Eve did use procedural generation at the start in terms of planet/moon distributions amongst the systems (edit: and more besides). I believe I even read somewhere that the seed was '42' :)

To a point, yes. Minecraft does work like that. But there is no unwritten rule that says that the other components in the universe can't also be governed procedurally using different seeds as required -- for example, use a timer offset (universe epoch) to seed events and universe-wide transforms.

Did not know that about EvE...thanks for the info.
 
- It allows those of us that wanted offline, and that are ready to ask for refunds due to offline play not being available, to try the game and see for ourselves if the online solo mode is an acceptable substitute. The way it's now, with players assuming that any attempt at playing the game will mean forfeiting the chance of refunds, those players — even the ones for which solo online might be acceptable — will simply leave without trying the game.

Excellent point. Although, if you have an issue with the EULA or MMOs in general, the decision is sort of already made.
 
The issues is that this while the it is a minority you have been making a lot of noise! Which is very annoying having endless news feeds trashing FD.

The blind defense of Frontier and David Braben's decisions towards your fellow backers and supporters show a complete lack of empathy.

It makes things so much worse while fracturing the community at the very moment Elite needs cohesion.

But don't feel too bad. It wasn't your decisions that led to this mess. No, that responsibility belongs with David Braben, Michael, and every other Frontier officer that made a bad call; and then continued to let pride get in the way of humility.

My hope is not that Frontier fails because of this enormous blunder. My hope is that Frontier realize that their vision of an ad-supported online-only MMO might not be as popular as they thought it was and adapt accordingly.

I would still very much like to play the Elite : Dangerous that I backed almost 2 years ago. Regrettably, it is looking like that will never be possible.
 
Last edited:
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.

Edmund Burke

Have we truly regressed so far in society as to believe the dropping of a planned feature in BETA software warrants such a quote? This thread has reached extreme levels of melodrama only the internet is capable of creating.
 
Thanks for trying, guy. Wouldn't even have helped seventeen years ago, I'm afraid.

I wonder if I'm alone in feeling both disappointed and annoyed or shamed that I'm actually disappointed. Such conflicting emotions are prone to cause violent outbursts in certain types of people, and we have seen quite a few hostile outbursts these past few days.

Me I would say that I'm amazed that the people who go out of their way to attack those who wanted the offline, expect them to turn around and play with them in multiplayer without realising that for some people in the offline group it is exactly what they want to avoid...
 
Me I would say that I'm amazed that the people who go out of their way to attack those who wanted the offline, expect them to turn around and play with them in multiplayer without realising that for some people in the offline group it is exactly what they want to avoid...

Alas, this is the internet after all, and I've got a little too used to seeing the worst excesses of it. Even after this mess is a long and distant memory, the community has fractured and it's going to take far longer to heal -that-, along with FDEV's reputation, then the decisions made by those in charge. Ugh.
 
Then rethink that please and accept it. We can get really heated when we argue, but I try to keep it non-personal, and sometimes when it becomes personal, if an olive branch is offered I take it. Adept can and does take criticism of his ideas.

I don't think you'll find the olive branch was coming from Adept, it was coming from FDEV with the revision of the refund policy, it's a bit of crossed wires. Not being difficult here, but trying to clarify the chronology in the posts.
 
I don't think you'll find the olive branch was coming from Adept, it was coming from FDEV with the revision of the refund policy, it's a bit of crossed wires. Not being difficult here, but trying to clarify the chronology in the posts.

I mean Adept's point about being positive was directed at littleminxundr
 
Me I would say that I'm amazed that the people who go out of their way to attack those who wanted the offline, expect them to turn around and play with them in multiplayer without realising that for some people in the offline group it is exactly what they want to avoid...

those people who are keen not to interact with others on the interweb seem to be managing just fine with it on these forums.

Officially bored now.
 
Even if they now included offline mode I would still ask for a refund because of the disgusting backstabbing way they have treated trusting loyal backers! ED can burn for all I care now - they will not be allowed to forget this abuse and greed! They should be ashamed that they are not allowing refunds - social media justice is just begining and this aint the 80's anymore - online reputation is king and people power rules reputation.

Mobrule is never a good thing.
 
It is unfortunate that Frontier and David Braben left no alternative.

Or ya know, people could have used judgement instead of signing onto in-development software before it had all their most-desired features. But yeah, Braben and his company are 100% to blame for the people who have been playing Elite:Dangerous for months all of a sudden wanting a refund.
 
And I honestly don't disagree with the fact it is a sensitive subject and that people do care about the game, After so many years of waiting we all want the game to be the best it can be.

But the repeated insults at FD, other Forum Members and the Moderators are not acceptable in any way shape or form. People are more that capable of putting their side of a discusion accros without using derogatory terms and baiting others into the same.

I'm honestly truly saddened at some of the things i've read on here recently. I really do believe this forum is a fantastic community, and I pray that that never changes.

Passion is a wonderful thing and it's the reason we are all here, A passion for Elite. Passion however is not shouting down anyone who thinks differently.

It's all about respecting others opinions, and as soon as someone sarts to insult another forum member, in my eyes they've instantly lost the argument.

So to everyone, please consider how you post.

Thanks.

I'm of a mind that 'online communities' don't exist, but are a replacement for something that's missing in a person's offline live, even more so if they defend the 'online community' to a fault. I'm not here for the faceless puppets, I'm here for the game and the fact that I'm here should not be mistaken for me welcoming the questionable opportunity to talk to other people. Far from it, really.

The people I care for are the people I can touch. Everybody else is background noise and their feelings and opinions moot; afterall I won't lose any sleep over any one of the people in this community not being here tomorrow, which as I'm aware off, is a likewise carried sentiment should the tables be turned.

Cumbaya is an idé-fixe, a shallow coating of rainbowpaint that is as devoid of character as the people that embody it, and nothing but lip-service to those that moderate it. You only see a nice community thus, because you have the power to ban. Nothing more, nothing less.
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom