Being a cyborg myself. I can tell you that being a 1000 years old at this point is pretty boring.
Then you must be familiar with this
View attachment 9310
and brain controlled games and machines, right?
View attachment 9311
Not so far anymore?![]()
No still just as far - seeing as neither of those pictures display anything that will extend the human lifespan - yes someone can now walk with a robotic leg and someone can move a ball which is programmed to react to certain brain signatures. Still nothing to do with extending the human lifespan. You're just giving examples of advancements in technology and then going see we'll be immortal in no time - show me a picture of someone who was once blind and can now see thanks to science. I'm sure that's more evidence that we'll be immortal in 10 years.
Not so far anymore?![]()
No still just as far - seeing as neither of those pictures display anything that will extend the human lifespan - yes someone can now walk with a robotic leg and someone can move a ball which is programmed to react to certain brain signatures. Still nothing to do with extending the human lifespan. You're just giving examples of advancements in technology and then going see we'll be immortal in no time - show me a picture of someone who was once blind and can now see thanks to science. I'm sure that's more evidence that we'll be immortal in 10 years.
Just because you want something to be true, doesn't make it so. As someone said before, how does a bionic leg and crude mind game overcome entropy? Do you even know what entropy and the mechanics of aging are? Do you understand how your DNA decays? I'm guessing you don't.
- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -
That's basically me stating that we'll have flying cars next year and proving my point with a picture of a Boeing 747.
Actually, really, really far. Brain controlled games are incredibly crude at present, working by detecting large scale shifts in brain activity. If you want anything complicated or powerful (like mapping a brain fully in a state that it can exist in a recognizable form as software), you're going to have to crack a lot of pretty fundamental problems. Not least of which is that human brain is covered with ridges to maximize surface area, but every brain is ridged differently. That and the brain constructs itself as you grow. That means that even if you could map your brain absolutely perfectly, that tech wouldn't work on me and we'd have to start over.
Eventually we'll solve a lot (or all) of these problems.
But there's a much bigger problem to my mind - how are we going to divide the space and resources if people stop dying? We either have exponential growth until we run out of food/energy and space or we stop people breeding, stagnating society and making living for a long time a punishment.
And finally... for ever is a really long time. Do you really want to be here when the universe dies of heat death? When all matter is so spread out that nothing can form? Just you, floating in the infinite cold. Forever.
I'd suggest it's not a goal worth striving for.
You need to study moreCheck out the links, mostly the 1st one, its a damn scientist!
EDIT: the lifespan in 1900 it was 45 years old... do the math![]()
Yeah, the average lifespan means nothing really. It was so low due to not easy access to medical treatment to treat infection and viruses, therefor you get many young people dying. So the average of the whole is brought down dramatically. But the expected life span of an average man (natural death), even in Ancient Greece was over 50 or 60.
The easy access to treatment, drugs/antidotes for common viruses and infections and better birthing methods are the things that push our 'average life span' higher. Less people dying very young. Doctors don't come out with a new drug every 10 years that pushes our 'limits' 5 years further... It's statistical misconception.
Yes, it means that we've got a lot better in the last 100 years at stopping people from getting killed (either through accidents or being able to prevent and treat diseases). It doesn't mean we've managed to do anything at all about maximum lifespans. Someone 1000 years ago could live just as long as the oldest people now, they were just more likely to encounter something that killed them before they managed it.All of it means evolution. The average lifespan was almost the same 2000 years ago and 100 years ago. In 100 years you almost double it.
There are more people with more than 100 years old now than ever, does this means anything?
All of it means evolution. The average lifespan was almost the same 2000 years ago and 100 years ago. In 100 years you almost double it.
There are more people with more than 100 years old now than ever, does this means anything?
Emperor Duval cant be in coma and dying, its a scam! In year 3301 we will be, at least, immortals!
Some scientists say that people in the age of 20 now, will live 1000 years.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGD-7M7iYzs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aA-H0L3eEo0