Frequency, Vibration, Energy.
Only think about them.
Only think about them.
You make interesting points.
Hmmm... the way I understand it, Communism is Marxist-Leninism and derivatives thereof. There were some early modern forerunners (the Levellers, the Jacobins maybe), but no communist societies in recorded history before the 19th century IIRC.
Now, there is a "golden age" mythos common to communist/utopian/equalitarian thought systems that insists prehistoric societies were communist somehow. But this lacks credibility. From what we can tell of ancient man, private property has always been A Thing (even chimpanzees understand the concept of "mine" and "yours" and barter), and trade has been A Thing for at least as long as the first humans migrated out of Africa.
Prehistoric societies were more like tribes, or clans than they were "communist" in the sense we understand the term. If they had a high degree of material equality, it was only because they were so desperately poor, not because of any ideological commitment to equality.
Now, religion. Do we define any primitive belief in the supernatural as "religion"? I don't see why not. The druids had their gods, cave men had ceremonial artifacts and likely a sort of animistic faith. Seems to me these are in the same family tree as, say, a modern system of theology.
Anyhoo, as far as the game goes, it would be awesome if there were isolated monastic space stations full of technologist-monks who invented weird and wonderful new ship modules.
It seems most of the Apollo astronauts became more religious for having touched the void of outer space, not less.
Perhaps it's because there are greater forces in the universe than physical science can explain. Or perhaps our primitive mammalian hindbrains are just wired that way. But it's unlikely humans will be fundamentally different beings in 1,000 years' time.
Here's why religion will still be around in 3300-odds:
Mankind yearns to understand "why?"
Why are we here? Is there some greater purpose to life? Is the universe really just a bundle of particles and energies? Is death really the end?
Science explains the "how", but cannot explain the "why", because it doesn't ask the same sort of questions.
There's an assumption on the part of atheists that, because they feel themselves to be clever and rational, their view of the universe represents evolution and progress.
But Neil Armstrong was no intellectual slouch either. Or Isaac Newton. Or Johannes Kepler.
It seems most of the Apollo astronauts became more religious for having touched the void of outer space, not less.
Perhaps it's because there are greater forces in the universe than physical science can explain. Or perhaps our primitive mammalian hindbrains are just wired that way. But it's unlikely humans will be fundamentally different beings in 1,000 years' time.
It's a big galaxy. There's bound to be a profusion of faiths and philosophies in it.
The likelihood of and/or type of religion in a given system could be generated based upon the culture and history of the system/area, and the physical/economic/political freedom that it's residents enjoy. Lots of freedom? A self-centred ideology would probably prevail, and religious zeal would be fairly low. Too little freedom? The opposite.
And you can add to that the sure and certain knowledge that wherever there are those who crave power then there will surely be religion. Because religion is, and always has been, the single best way to control the masses.
I would hazard a guess that the efficacy of religion as a control tool drops as the tech level (thus, the education level) of society rises. This could be used to estimate the balance of control methods (political/cultural/economic/physical/etc) that is likely to be employed by the local authority on a given planet/landmass/etc, and this would determine the types of gameplay/missions/tasks you might expect to be offered in such a place.