So you admit you have no understanding of our cause and this thread in general, at all. Good to know, good to know.
I don't think you can withdraw what you said based on context. I do not insult, I disprove other people's arguments with reason and respect every opinion equally, which you do not apparently do.
"I never insulted you but you did insult me with your insinuations."
Oh dear... It's hard to not laugh at this rate... We can play this game all day. Everything is an insinuation against me, I am insulted...
You are the one claiming that insulting people, me in particular in the most literal way is a method to prove a point, which is against forum rules and something that does not quite hold up to the moral standards you establish yourself in when you passed judgement upon this "crusade" of ours...
I am not a pirate and never was but agree with OP and most posters.
A multi ton canister would make sense (after all a ton of paper or a ton of gold wouldnt take the same space).
Hope this will be fixed.
Yes I have no understanding as to your cause, that is correct, I do not see the point of it at all. By the way laugh all you want it is supposedly good for the soul, if you feel I have somehow broken forum rules then I honestly don't see how as I never insulted you. I disagree with you and what you are proposing as a solution to the nerf to piracy......get over it. People disagree and opinions are like a certain part of the human anatomy meaning everybody has one.
I cant actually believe this limit exists. Just as I thought ED was getting better; 5 steps backwards. Needs fixing, complete crap. And I dont even Pirate.
Thank you for supporting the cause, and that is a suggestion many made, but FD never responded to properly. Hopefully FD takes it into consideration along with the fixing of this issue.
- - - Updated - - -
Disagreement between individuals should exist as diversity should be preserved, but by insulting said opposition is prohibited by forum rules. It is quite simple, you blatantly admitted that you insulted me and that it is a valid methodology to prove a point, that is problematic.
If anything, you, good sir, is the one that needs to "get over" the concept that there will be inevitable diversity and people need to learn and educate ourselves to tolerate said diversity instead of insulting others.
You are free to voice your opinion, but the moment you find your opinion superior than another by claiming other opinions to be non-sense, that is when I need to remind you of your hubris, and your breach of the terms you agreed to when you use this forum.
But I guess that is what is convenient and instinctual to you, oh my, what does that say about you...
Meh, I'll let that thought float somewhere else...
What?!? I never admitted anything of the sort and didn't insult you, I was pointing out the fact that I found your unspoken insinuations towards me were insulting.
I've had a rethink on Operation Scorched Earth.
Instead of killing indiscriminately I propose we make the traders drop their entire cargo regardless of ship type and then take our 20t.
Once traders see all their cargo disintegrate leaving a measly 20t I think that would be enough to get the point across.
Good idea but I don't think anyone could get even one trader to drop all their cargo.I've had a rethink on Operation Scorched Earth.
Instead of killing indiscriminately I propose we make the traders drop their entire cargo regardless of ship type and then take our 20t.
Once traders see all their cargo disintegrate leaving a measly 20t I think that would be enough to get the point across.
Right after you claimed that insulting people is a valid way to prove a point as a direct response to my post, which stated that ad hominem is not something that should be used as a part of an argument, you claim that you never insulted me and I am apparently insulting you.
Wh...what?
Again, if we want to play the unspoken insinuation game, we can do it all day. Anyone can claim to be offended by anything. However, when you blatantly state that insulting me was suppose to prove a point in the most literal terms, what did you expect my response to be?
Good idea but I don't think anyone could get even one trader to drop all their cargo.
If you thought I was insulting you then you have my apologies for that but I don't agree with your strategy of indiscriminate killing to "prove a point" and that won't change.
Anything trying to punish other players for points you disagree with FD about is a bad thought.
Well, you're not wrong, but i just don't see many traders complying.Well it's better to try that first than indiscriminate killing. It's still usually cheaper than a trader's rebuy.
That is akin to saying that a disadvantaged population in society should not fight for equality. Again, pre 1964 US anyone? Birmingham Alabama anyone?
Well, you're not wrong, but i just don't see many traders complying.
So if you disagree with the president you feel you should take that out on everyone else? Great logics there. Pre 1964 is really awesome stuff to live by.
I hear there's a violin playing for you sad pirates. Us top earning explorers are playing.