According to today's very poor economic news, Bill Gates has lost an estimated 1.3 Billion dollars.
I don't know about you but I feel real sorry for the bloke.
According to today's very poor economic news, Bill Gates has lost an estimated 1.3 Billion dollars.
I don't know about you but I feel real sorry for the bloke.
I've always had a soft spot for Bill ever since this article:
http://www.theonion.com/article/bill-gates-grants-self-18-dexterity-20-charisma-837
According to today's very poor economic news, Bill Gates has lost an estimated 1.3 Billion dollars.
I don't know about you but I feel real sorry for the bloke.
So I went and read that article.
I'm such a nerd that my only reaction to it was "huh, they based that on third edition. That was a terrible edition of D&D."
Aww. Third is only surpassed by 2nd edition in my opinion. And only just - thAC0 was horrible. 4th is terrible. 5th doesn't seem quite so bad, but still not great.
I still play first. I've run the same world for 20+ years. THAC0 is just very simple maths, I never understood why people hated it.
1e - a good role playing game. The DM runs the game.
2e - a good role playing game with approximately 38 too many splat books. The DM still runs the game.
3e - a poor role playing game, but lots of crunch for video gamers and people without imaginations. The DM has much less control over the game thanks to too much codification of rules and systems.
4e - a fun board game, hopeless for anything else. Combats can take hours, DMs have absolutely no control over the game and become mere "narrators" to the players running around and being heroic. Very sad.
5e - an okay role playing game. Too much stuff is codified and not enough left to imagination, but at least they put in place strong backing for the DM to change whatever (s)he wants. A good step in the right direction.
1eWFRP - Everyone should actually be playing this because it's so much better than anything. Also, John Blanche.
(Is it possible to go too far off topic in an off topic thread? Hmm.)
So I went and read that article.
I'm such a nerd that my only reaction to it was "huh, they based that on third edition. That was a terrible edition of D&D."
I think our affair might be over Julissa...
Roll a d20 + 4.
Curses! I rolled a seven, leaving me a total of eleven. But if we have to split up, I'm keeping the beach house to start that bacon sorority I always talked about. You can have the family anaconda.
You mean the snake don't you? Not the ship.
Well maps sometimes so we had a rough idea how everyone was placed, but that was about it.
So I went and read that article.
I'm such a nerd that my only reaction to it was "huh, they based that on third edition. That was a terrible edition of D&D."
I still play first. I've run the same world for 20+ years. THAC0 is just very simple maths, I never understood why people hated it.
I was joking guys. It was my sarcasm at work.
Bringing this back on topic-ish ...
What annoys me about people who have stupid amounts of money, like Bill Gates, if I contacted him and asked nicely if he'd give me a million dollars, an amount, while a lot of money to me, is to him, like a £1 (or a $1) to me, his reaction/reply to me would be "Why should I give you a million dollars?". Of course that's a very good reply, and he'd be very justified to ask that, but I mean, come on, he's got a stupid amount of money he'll never be able to spend (though I do hear Warren Buffet is making a really good effort at spending & giving it all away before he dies) and Bill's children & grandchildren & great-grandchildren will never be able to spend ... a million would be something he'd not even notice.
In a world where 5% have more money than the other 95%, hoarding it like that, really annoys me (and why I respect Warren Buffet more than Bill Gates, even though Warren won't give me a million dollars either).
EDIT: The really ironic thing is, if I did get a million dollars (or pound sterling), I wouldn't spend it either ... but I would spend the interest it'd make in the bank.
Bringing this back on topic-ish ...
What annoys me about people who have stupid amounts of money, like Bill Gates, if I contacted him and asked nicely if he'd give me a million dollars, an amount, while a lot of money to me, is to him, like a £1 (or a $1) to me, his reaction/reply to me would be "Why should I give you a million dollars?". Of course that's a very good reply, and he'd be very justified to ask that, but I mean, come on, he's got a stupid amount of money he'll never be able to spend (though I do hear Warren Buffet is making a really good effort at spending & giving it all away before he dies) and Bill's children & grandchildren & great-grandchildren will never be able to spend ... a million would be something he'd not even notice.
In a world where 5% have more money than the other 95%, hoarding it like that, really annoys me (and why I respect Warren Buffet more than Bill Gates, even though Warren won't give me a million dollars either).
EDIT: The really ironic thing is, if I did get a million dollars (or pound sterling), I wouldn't spend it either ... but I would spend the interest it'd make in the bank.