Rift Higher Price than Expected? $600

On a lighter note I see Facebook Stock's early gains due to the announcement (presumably) of Oculus Preorders have been wiped out by a sharp fall at around 2.30 when presumably news leaked of the Oculus price. Its regained some, but not enough to cover whatever they will make by charging full price for the rift instead of subsidising it. Great Job, corporate jackasses!

Right now its down .18 percent. That's a loss of 6 million US dollars. so far. Still dropping.
 
Last edited:
Reliably informed that when you checkout it says "You'll be charged when your order ships. Tax is included in order total."

Correct, and mine also said "Customs duty £0.00" so presumably this means UK orders ship from within the UK. EDIT: wait, could also mean it's shipped from within the EU.
 
Last edited:
Shipping to Australia $132 - not even sure if that is AUD or US - this is just daylight robbery. If the Occulus site is in USD then the total is over $1100 AUD. I can't do it.
 
Last edited:
Its roughly 900€ including shipping and taxes für europeans which equals about 1080$

I think I'm fine with TrackIR and getting a larger screen for now.
 
Palmer Lucky said they had missed the $350 price target but he said it was in the ball park and not far off.
Not sure what you have been reading but the above was fromPL himself.

Here's an article from Sept last year were PL talks about pricing and he doesnt say it would be $350 or ballpark. Have a read..

http://www.roadtovr.com/oculus-founder-palmer-luckey-explains-oculus-rift-cost-price-350/

"....We could have made tradeoffs that had… honestly like 90% of the tracking quality we had now, and we decided to do things that would bump that quality up a little bit more even though it raised the cost of the headset. I can’t tell you that it’s going to be $350, and I would say I think people are going to be happy with what they get for the price because I really do think it’s going to be that best VR headset you can buy."

Happy doesnt seem to be the general reaction unfortunately.
 
Last edited:
I don't know categorically, no, which is why I said IMHO. :rolleyes:

Vive comes with 2 "lighthouse" things and hand controllers - IMHO it will be more expensive. Not only that but HTC are not in good shape financially - they will possibly want a quick return on this for their investor reports. They've also been routinely talking about their product as being a "premium" option. Not so subtle way of telling people that it will not be as cheap as the opposition, again IMHO.

You obviously don't follow VR news too closely, as Oculus have been hinting at the price increase from what they hoped it could be done for, for quite some time. People are still quoting the years old $300, despite the fact that CV1 is much, more than a rebadged DK1. I think some people were being unrealistic in their hopes.

4K sucks compared to VR, just saying. :D

I follow it close enough to know what Zuckerberg was saying fairly recently about its pricing structure, and although he was hinting at higher prices his recent musings in the press put its top end around the GBP400 mark not 500. Just because I don't own a DK1 or 2 don't extrapolate that out to make a veiled statement that when it comes to VR news I am talking out of my nether regions because your obviously wrong.

HTC not being in a strong financial position does not mean they could not beat the rifts latest hike. In fact from a business standpoint I would not be surprised to find HTC smiling a little especially if their offering, when and if it comes to market reasonably quickly, will now have wiggle room to be sold with it's more useful accessories at a similar or even a little more competitive price than Rift.

So you don't think then from your tone that Rift isn't offering itself at a premium price also. As for people hinting at $300 years old pricing, 2015 was a few days ago and it was being suggested in that same year earlier on that the pricing could be similar to the DK2's.

I get the impression from your postings on this subject that you seem to be almost pushing the Rift as some sort of fair deal to justify your own planned purchase of it to yourself, which you do not need to do. It isn't a fair deal in many peoples view and putting down others views as acidly as you seem to be doing is not respecting others views. Putting IMHO does nothing to justify your view neither, nor does repeating and bolding it. It has been my experience that drawing attention in this way in no way bolsters your own view.

If in your view it is a fair price to pay then go ahead and I hope ED can work out the bugs for all, including you who do invest. But from a reasonably successful retired business woman, I still maintain that the high price required for a product that was, until recently, fully supported by this company, and now has the community manager putting out forum press releases, mentioning sadness at how things look between them and OR, with nebulous future possible solutions, and the switching to a different VR company to support their product, it would be a sign of hoping, and consumer madness to invest in the Occulus Rift until more is known.

Would you also stop making the, in your opinion, 4k sucks compared to VR, statement. How one person views that which is presented to them in certain different ways is a totally subjective view. To the person who feels sick, or suffers headaches and/or is very uncomfortable wearing a huge box strapped to their forehead, a 4K 2d version of ED is far superior to that of any VR headset.

Although I have admitted I was blown away by what I experienced when ED sat me down at EGX with an Occulus Rift on my head, for resolution and crispness the Rift headset doesn't hold a candle to the 4K monitor setup I use, to me. Only for immersion does it have the 4k monitor beaten, but I have a rich imagination and from also being a bookworm, and imagining my own scenarios as I read a well written novel, it is very easy for me to lose myself in ED on a 2d screen, and with 4K and trackir it gives me a wonderful experience. That is my subjective view and for me VR doesn't suck neither does my setup.
But my own view and business experience is telling me that the situation with the OR is decidedly not a good investment at this time. Premium prices should only be demanded from manufacturers when they have a stable, fully workable and compatible product for the market they are trying to penetrate, which at the moment none of the VR players do.
 
It's a BIG mistake.

I was waiting for many years... And I prepared myself to pay between 350€ and 499€ max today.

I took my pause at work to stay in front of my screen when the countdown finished....

Blank pages for 10 minutes....

...Then I saw 59900 USD !!! (59000 and not 599.00)... I understood that it was 599 USD which means 567€ !

...Then I tried to order, and when I choosed "France" on the list, the 599 USD became 699€ ! ...without shipment.

...Then I canceled my order and returned to work.

Now, I m waiting for the Vive, and I m fixing my Cardboard.

F* Facebook.
 
Woke up at 7:45 :p

Refreshed browser at 8 :D

Saw price :eek:

Closed browser :mad:

Cried myself back to sleep :(


Seriously though, based on comments by Palmer this whole time I had set aside $450 for the CV1 and was prepared to go up to $500. At no time did I ever imagine it would cost $600! The sad thing is, if they took out the Xbox controller (I already have 2) and the crappy earmuffs (I have a better headset I'll be using, thanks), I think they could have hit that $500 I was willing to spend...

Still, this will give me more quality time with my DK2 and some time to upgrade my PC to really do the CV1 justice by the time the price comes down.
 
Sony have tweeted a joke about the Rift price, they say the Rift VR will transport you to fantasy worlds, like a world where people will buy $599 VR devices.
Sony are expected to sell theirs close the cost of a PS4, so around £300.
I feel a bit better about my Elite choice now.
 
Palmer Lucky said they had missed the $350 price target but he said it was in the ball park and not far off.
Not sure what you have been reading but the above was fromPL himself.

Can't speak for others, but I'm surprised for several reasons:

Palmer Luckey said they were aiming for $200-$400.
Palmer Luckey said that it would be more than $350 but it was in the ball park.
The DK2 was only $350 and I haven't heard anything about the CV1 that to me justifies nearly doubling the price (which is subsidized).



We have different definitions of 'should'.

$599 is in the ballpark for a $400 target while still in testing. Cutting edge technology is always expensive, especially when it's brand new.

And yes, we do definitely have different definitions of 'should' if you think HTC will be selling the Premium VR set for less than the CV1, which isn't touted as the Premium VR set, it's touted as the affordable VR set.
 
So it says $782 at my checkout - does anyone know whether that is in USD or my local currency (AUD)? I'm confused by those of you quoting prices in pounds etc.

I might pull the trigger at $782 - but not at $1100 if that is not already converted.
 
Last edited:

Slopey

Volunteer Moderator
I don't see how the Vive can be cheaper. For one, many thousands upon thousands of people are buying a Rift, even at that price point. Also, the Vive isn't going to be cheaper with an additional front facing camera and all that hyped-up software nonsense.

If people are expecting a $300 Vive, I think they're in for a nasty surprise.

VR isn't going to be a commodity priced item until it's ubiquitous - we're not even into the first iteration of consumer hardware yet. It's implausible to think that within 3 months they'll be dirt cheap.
 
Lol - saw that one coming.

It was always quite clear that VR is going to be an expensive early adopters thing in the early stages. Hence the entire 'VR for everyone, shipping with a dummy controller so you can meet your facebook friends in VR using the Xbox controller you're used to' approach never made any sense to me.

Don't really know what the fuss is about - compared to the PC needed to run it, the cost is negligible.
 
The sad thing is, if they took out the Xbox controller (I already have 2) and the crappy earmuffs (I have a better headset I'll be using, thanks), I think they could have hit that $500 I was willing to spend...

Add me to the list of those wanting a budget, bare-bones version. Use off-the-shelf parts and make it large and uncomfortable, as long as it's $400 or under.
 
Now, I m waiting for the Vive, and I m fixing my Cardboard
Vive won't be any cheaper. These devices are using bespoke screens, optics, plastics. Oculus are supposedly making a loss on this hardware and it's hard to see how HTC would be able to do the same.
 
$599 is in the ballpark for a $400 target while still in testing.
We have different definitions of ballpark.
And yes, we do definitely have different definitions of 'should' if you think HTC will be selling the Premium VR set for less than the CV1, which isn't touted as the Premium VR set, it's touted as the affordable VR set.
Since you think that the Vive "should" sell for $800 to $1000, yes, I think they "should" sell it less than that.
 
Sony have tweeted a joke about the Rift price, they say the Rift VR will transport you to fantasy worlds, like a world where people will buy $599 VR devices.
Sony are expected to sell theirs close the cost of a PS4, so around £300.
I feel a bit better about my Elite choice now.

The account where that tweet came from is a false account. (parody).
 
Back
Top Bottom